Senin, 08 Februari 2021

Myanmar military ruler defends coup as protests intensify - Al Jazeera English

Myanmar’s new military rulers have imposed a curfew in the country’s two biggest cities and banned gatherings of more than five people, as they seek to stamp out growing protests against last week’s military coup.

The decrees issued on Monday came as Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, in a televised address to the nation, called on the public to prioritise facts and not feelings and repeated the unsubstantiated claim that there were irregularities in November’s election.

The military ruler’s remarks were his first since he led the coup against civilian leader Aung San Suu Kyi’s elected government on February 1, in a move that has sparked widespread protests and triggered international condemnation.

The army has announced a one-year state of emergency and on Monday imposed new restrictions, including the banning of rallies and gatherings of more than five people, along with motorised processions. Martial law was also imposed in parts of Yangon and Mandalay and other townships in Myanmar, a country that spent decades under military rule after a 1962 coup.

Also on Monday, the military warned of action against protesters, saying there had been violations of the law and threats of force by groups “using the excuse of democracy and human rights”.

During protests in 1988 and 2007, the military used force to put down pro-democracy protests, leaving thousands dead.

“Action must be taken according to the law with effective steps against offences which disturb, prevent and destroy the state’s stability, public safety and the rule of law,” said a statement read by an announcer on state-run MRTV.

The generals previously justified their takeover on the grounds of election fraud, promising to hold new elections.

Min Aung Hlaing reiterated that position in his address on Monday, saying the military government would form a “true and disciplined democracy” different to previous eras of military rule. The general said his military government would hold new elections as promised in a year and hand over power to the winners, and explained its intended policies for COVID-19 control and the economy.

A police vehicle fires water cannon in an attempt to disperse protesters during a demonstration against the military coup in Naypyidaw, Myanmar’s capital, on Monday [AFP]
Aung San Suu Kyi’s National League for Democracy won November’s poll by a landslide, improving on its performance in the 2015 election and leaving the military’s proxy party trailing.

Ronan Lee, author of Myanmar’s Rohingya Genocide, told Al Jazeera that Min Aung Hlaing’s speech was “utterly tone deaf to the obvious frustration and anger that’s been demonstrated in the towns, cities and villages across Myanmar for the last week”.

“Hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have been protesting about the coup and Min Aung Hlaing’s response astoundingly seemed to blame the democratically elected government of not being appropriately committed to democracy as one cause for the coup,” Lee said.

“He then suggested that the economic environment for investment would be good under the military. This is during the week when multinational corporations are running away from Myanmar.”

Senior General Min Aung Hlaing addresses the nation on live television [Screenshot/Reuters TV]

Growing protests

Demonstrations against last week’s coup had intensified on Monday and spread to more towns and cities, with tens of thousands joining a third day of street protests to condemn the military’s actions including the arrest of Aung San Suu Kyi, who spent years under house arrest during the previous military regime.

In the capital, Naypyidaw, where Myanmar’s top civilian leaders are believed to be held, videos posted on social media on Monday showed police firing brief bursts of water cannon to try and disperse peaceful protesters gathered on a highway.

Three lines of police in riot gear stood on the road as the crowd chanted anti-coup slogans and told police they should serve the people, not the military, according to media and a live feed of events.

Police placed a sign on the road saying that live ammunition could be used if demonstrators breached the third line of officers.

In Yangon, nurses, teachers, civil servants and monks joined anti-coup demonstrations. Some held signs denouncing the coup and calling for democracy, as others flew multicoloured Buddhist flags alongside red banners, the colour of the NLD.

Kyaw Zin Tun, an engineer protesting in Yangon, told the AFP news agency he was at the rally because he remembered the fear he felt growing up under the military rule during his childhood in the 1990s.

“In the last five years, under democracy government, our fears were removed. But now fear is back again with us, therefore, we have to throw out this military junta for the future of all of us,” the 29-year-old said.

Thousands gathered on Monday for the third day of protests against the coup staged by the military on  February 1 [Ye Aung Thu/AFP]
Thousands also marched in the southern city of Dawei and in the capital of far northern Kachin state, Myitkyina – the massive crowds reflecting a rejection of military rule by diverse ethnic groups, even those who have been critical of Aung San Suu Kyi and accused her government of neglecting minorities.

Monday’s demonstrations came a day after tens of thousands of people protested against the coup in cities and towns across the country, in the biggest show of public dissent since a 2007 revolt led by monks that was brutally suppressed by the military. A year later, the generals held a referendum on a newly drafted constitution, which made sure the military maintained considerable power but opened the door to a civilian government.

A quasi-civilian government took power in 2011, and four years later the NLD swept to victory at polls.

UN special session

Separately on Monday, the United Nations Human Rights Council said it would hold a special session on Myanmar on February 11, after the United Kingdom and European Union joined rights groups in calling for a meeting of the UN body.

Julian Braithwaite, the UK’s ambassador in Geneva, said the call was “in response to the state of emergency imposed in Myanmar, the arbitrary detention of democratically elected politicians and civil society by the military”, which he said had “grave implications for human rights in the country”.

“We must respond urgently to the plight of the people of Myanmar and the rapidly deteriorating human rights situation there,” he said.

People hold up placards as they join a rally to protest in Yangon [Stringer/Reuters]
Braithwaite said the backers of the special session call would inform other council members soon about the drafting of a resolution on the issue.

Amnesty International welcomed the decision, noting that at least 150 people had been detained since the coup on February 1 and that many human rights defenders had gone into hiding.

“It is critical that the international community uses all the tools at its disposal to respond to the Myanmar military’s assault on human rights,” Emerlynne Gil, the group’s deputy regional director for research said in a statement. “Myanmar’s military leadership includes perpetrators of crimes against international law, amd they cannot be allowed to terrorize the country unchecked.”

Gil stressed any measures taken by the Human Rights Council needed to be seen as complementary to – and not an alternative to – action in the UN Security Council.

Amnesty and other civil society groups are calling for sanctions on Min Aung Hlaing and other senior generals behind the brutal military crackdowns on the Rohingya and other ethnic minorities, as well as a global arms embargo and Myanmar’s referral to the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmFsamF6ZWVyYS5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDIxLzIvOC9teWFubWFyLW1pbGl0YXJ5LWxlYWRlci1naXZlcy1maXJzdC1hZGRyZXNzLXRvLW5hdGlvbi1zaW5jZS1jb3Vw0gFsaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWxqYXplZXJhLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy8yMDIxLzIvOC9teWFubWFyLW1pbGl0YXJ5LWxlYWRlci1naXZlcy1maXJzdC1hZGRyZXNzLXRvLW5hdGlvbi1zaW5jZS1jb3Vw?oc=5

2021-02-09 00:45:00Z
52781362295733

The plot (and spoilers) of Impeachment II - BBC News

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer
Getty Images

The rule of thumb in the cinema is that the original is invariably better than the sequel.

But then you get The Dark Knight getting far more acclaim than Batman Begins. Or Godfather 2 being better than the first movie - and personally I thought Toy Story 3 was the best. And don't get me started on Star Wars.

So, what should we expect from Impeachment II, Incitement of Insurrection, coming to a TV screen near you this week?

Some very general and obvious observations.

The plotlines in this second impeachment will be much easier to follow than the original.

A presidential call to his Ukrainian counterpart asking questions about an obscure energy company on which Joe Biden's son had served as a director, does not have the immediacy of the events of 6 January when a Trump supporting mob stormed Congress after listening to a speech delivered by the president.

What is not in question is that the MAGA-mob tried to stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election. Five people died following the mayhem. There will not be an American who doesn't have a view on what unfolded.

The other quick observation I would make is this - the chamber where the Senate trial will unfold is also the crime-scene; the epicentre of this assault on America's most sacred democratic sanctum. And the corollary of that is that some of the people who will be 'trying' the former president will have felt themselves to be victims of the crime that unfolded.

So what chance is there that Donald Trump will get a fair trial?

Well, the first thing I would say about that is though the language of impeachment is replete with quasi-judicial terminology, the jurors are the 100 Senators - Republican and Democrat. This is political.

Supporters of US President Donald Trump protest inside the US Capitol on January 6, 2021
Getty Images

How many of those who will weigh the evidence for and against Donald Trump will be swayed by the evidence presented? I find it hard to imagine there will be a single one.

Democrats, I would guess, will vote as a block to convict. Republicans are split three ways - and this is a political split, not a schism based on the evidence.

There are those Republicans who remain firmly behind Donald Trump, and will not now, not ever, vote to find him guilty of "incitement of insurrection", the three words on the article of impeachment.

There are those who would love nothing more to see the former president slip away from the national consciousness, and feel that he has been a corrosive force on the democratic norms and values of US democracy - but don't want to pick a fight with him for fear of the consequences. Their worst nightmare is Trump rallying support behind a Republican rival the next time they're up for election.

And there is a smaller number of Republicans who are ready to very publicly say they believe that the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt and Reagan needs to be rid of the Trump legacy, that it is a cancer that needs to be cut out.

In other words, this will all be about political calculation. And the second order calculation will be how these senators will explain the decision to their voters.

Which brings us to this next question, how will this play itself out?

Democrats will make a case that evokes the drama of the day and the fears some of them had - they thought their lives were in danger as they cowered in offices while the mob went room to room. The blame for that will be laid squarely at the defendant's door.

The Trump defence will take two forms.

On the substance of the "incitement of insurrection" charge, his lawyers will argue that he was exercising his free speech, First Amendment rights - and they will point out that in that address on 6 January, the president told his supporters to march on Congress "peacefully and patriotically".

But the speech was notable for all its "We fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore." And telling his supporters that they have to be tough and not weak.

And his case is not helped by the tweets and messaging around this time - urging his supporters to come to Washington on 6 January because it was "going to be wild".

In a video released on the night of the riots, Donald Trump told the mob that had descended on Congress that he loved them and they were special people. He tweeted that evening - seemingly to justify the actions of the insurgents - that this is what happens when you steal the result of the election.

He repeatedly claimed he had won the election by a landslide. There is no evidence for that.

He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen. Judge after judge - many appointed by Donald Trump - rejected those legal arguments put by his campaign lawyers.

And the charges of fraud - again promoted by Mr Trump - were dismissed by the president's own Attorney General William Barr; the head of election security - another Trump appointee - also said the election had been fair.

So don't expect the president's words to be the backbone of the defence.

Instead it will focus on the constitutionality of impeaching a president once he's left office. The lawyers will argue that the weapon of impeachment is only to be used for a serving politician, not a private citizen (as Donald Trump now is).

How can you use the sanction of removing someone from office when they've already left office? And this is I suspect the justification (fig-leaf, I feel sure Democrats will insist) that Republicans will reach for as their justification for acquitting Donald Trump.

Former US President Donal Trump
AFP via Getty Images

Of course, Democrats will point out the offence took place while he was president, and you don't get a free pass just because you've left office. Or as James Corden put it on his Late, Late Show, it's like being pulled over by a traffic cop for speeding, and saying to the officer "I might well have been going at 50mph back then, but now as I speak to you I am stationary, so you can't charge me now…"

Impeachment II will get big, big TV audiences - though they'd have been far greater if the president had testified, as Democrat impeachment managers had wanted.

But the outcome - and here I feel the need to issue a spoiler alert - is almost certainly going to be the same as Impeachment I.

He will be acquitted.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS01NTk4NzYwMNIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC93b3JsZC11cy1jYW5hZGEtNTU5ODc2MDA?oc=5

2021-02-08 22:17:00Z
52781349573162

Haiti: Explosion of kidnappings shows a country sliding into absolute anarchy - Sky News

The impoverished country of Haiti - already an economic disaster zone with organised crime and kidnapping for ransom out of control - now finds itself in the midst of a constitutional crisis with violent confrontations between anti-government protesters and the police a daily occurrence.

The country's leading opposition parties, the judiciary and activist groups say the presidency of Jovenel Moise ended on Sunday after a five-year term.

The president says he has one year left in office, as an interim government ran the country for a year after his election.

Makeshift barricades are set up around the city
Image: Makeshift barricades are set up around the city

Despite repeated efforts and a continual weakening of his position the president, supported by the United States and most of the international community, is refusing to budge.

The opposition, which is itself a disorganised grouping of former presidential hopefuls, is calling the people on to the streets to force the president's removal.

But recently, strong-arm tactics of the police on the streets and gang-led intimidation have effectively been breaking up protest marches before they can even form.

For three days we have been on the streets of the capital, Port-au-Prince, as communities attempted to demonstrate.

More from Haiti

Haiti has a reputation for violent confrontation and it's easy to see why.

Billowing clouds of tear gas filled the streets in the capital as we travelled through rock strewn streets, around makeshift barricades, past burning tyres, cars and rubbish.

The people of Haiti say the president has failed to do anything for them
Image: The people of Haiti say the president has failed to do anything for them

It felt like a war zone, and to a degree it was.

Police passed by as we filmed, shooting live rounds indiscriminately at anyone who moved.

Through the gas, protesters would flee down the streets, the young and old clutching their eyes as the stinging gas enveloped them.

At a major intersection, where the protest marches usually form, they tried setting fires and built barricades, but the security forces were having none of it.

Riot police in 4x4s roared down the road firing volleys of gas and shotgun rounds before dismounting and taking aim at the protesters who fled in every direction.

Handgun rounds, rifle shots, tear gas and rubber bullets echoed and bounced around the streets.

Violent confrontation between anti-government protesters and the police happens daily
Image: Violent confrontations between anti-government protesters and the police happen daily

Some officers found themselves cut off from their units and were pelted with stones before colleagues came to their rescue - firing continuously at the rock throwers.

The plan was to disrupt and deny the marchers, and it worked. But for how long the police can keep this up depends greatly on the will of the people, and the ones we met seemed determined.

Travelling through Port-au-Prince, it is not difficult to see why people are unhappy. The city is a hell hole of poverty. We passed rows of filthy tented structures on a grey-black wasteland. It looked utterly horrendous. We were astonished to find that it was actually a vast functioning market.

Sixty percent of the population live in abject poverty, the streets look more like a battle-torn city than a functioning community, and everywhere stand destroyed or crumbling buildings.

Port au Prince has not been rebuilt since the earthquake 11 years ago
Image: Port-au-Prince has not been rebuilt since an earthquake 11 years ago

Eleven years ago, Haiti was smashed by a huge earthquake. I covered that story, and the streets look exactly the same now as they did then; that is because they are. Absolutely nothing has been rebuilt. Time has stood still.

"It's just the same, isn't it Stuart?" Haitian journalist, Brunelie Joseph, said to me.

"It really is a disgrace. Huge amounts of aid money came here to rebuild. Nothing has been done. All the money has been stolen."

A number of factors have contributed to this crisis in Haiti.

The people say the president has failed to do anything for them, that he has overseen rampant corruption, that the economy has continued to bomb.

But, worse than this, far, far worse in fact, is the explosion in kidnapping for ransom that is now endemic throughout all society, from the poorest to the richest.

The security forces use strong-arm tactics
Image: The security forces use strong-arm tactics

Everyone is targeted and nobody is safe. This is perhaps the greatest source of discontent.

Gangs appear to act with impunity. The opposition and its supporters blame the president for either allowing or actually aiding and abetting the operations of the gangs for political means.

Opposition areas were routinely the targets for the kidnapping gangs, but now it is everywhere.

"People are scared to travel anywhere," Brunelie explained.

"If I get in my car I wonder if I am going to be next. I now drive to places I would have easily walked to, but not anymore, and it is the same everywhere," she said.

On our motorbikes, we passed into some of the poorest communities, squeezing past barriers of cut down trees, bent over lamp posts and cement blocks, eased aside to let us pass.

Communities are being terrorised by kidnap gangs and organised crime
Image: Communities are being terrorised by kidnap gangs and organised crime

These communities are terrorised by kidnap gangs and organised crime, so they have barricaded themselves in and carry machetes to protect themselves. But it is of limited success.

Leaders talked of multiple gangs, with names like "The Spitfires", who carry out robberies and what they described as massacres and kidnappings.

They uniformly blame the president. When I asked what they would do if he refuses to stand down, I was greeted with a roar of anger from everyone around us.

"His mandate is finished, he must go," Alexander Mark Andre told me, accompanied by cheers from the crowd.

"We ask all the people of the nations - especially the United States, if the United States is a friend of Haiti and likes the Haitian people, take him [the president] out of power."

As the protests grow, as the violence continues, it's hard not to acknowledge what many have been predicting, and what the United Nations is warning: that this small nation is sliding into absolute anarchy.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2hhaXRpLWV4cGxvc2lvbi1vZi1raWRuYXBwaW5ncy1zaG93cy1hLWNvdW50cnktc2xpZGluZy1pbnRvLWFic29sdXRlLWFuYXJjaHktMTIyMTI4NjLSAXRodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvaGFpdGktZXhwbG9zaW9uLW9mLWtpZG5hcHBpbmdzLXNob3dzLWEtY291bnRyeS1zbGlkaW5nLWludG8tYWJzb2x1dGUtYW5hcmNoeS0xMjIxMjg2Mg?oc=5

2021-02-08 22:10:23Z
CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2hhaXRpLWV4cGxvc2lvbi1vZi1raWRuYXBwaW5ncy1zaG93cy1hLWNvdW50cnktc2xpZGluZy1pbnRvLWFic29sdXRlLWFuYXJjaHktMTIyMTI4NjLSAXRodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvaGFpdGktZXhwbG9zaW9uLW9mLWtpZG5hcHBpbmdzLXNob3dzLWEtY291bnRyeS1zbGlkaW5nLWludG8tYWJzb2x1dGUtYW5hcmNoeS0xMjIxMjg2Mg

Covid-19 US: NYC man in 70s dies 25 minutes after getting vaccine - Daily Mail

Man in his 70s collapses and dies just 25 minutes after receiving COVID-19 vaccine in NYC - as officials say he 'didn't have allergic reaction'

  • The man, who was in his 70s, collapsed as he left Manhattan's Jacob Javits Convention Center just 25 minutes after receiving his shot
  • The man has not yet been named and it's unclear what shot he received
  • His cause of death is also currently unknown with an investigation underway
  • New York State Health Commissioner Dr. Howard Zucker said: 'Initial indications are that the man did not have any allergic reaction to the vaccine'
  • Adverse reactions to the vaccine are considered extremely rare, with those few cases most commonly linked to an allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis
  • Around 42 million doses of the vaccine have so far been administered in the US

An elderly man collapsed and died in New York City on Sunday morning shortly after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine, officials revealed Monday.

The man, who was in his 70s, fell as he left Manhattan's Jacob Javits Convention Center just 25 minutes after receiving his shot, New York State Health Commissioner Dr. Howard Zucker said in a statement. 

On-site security and first responders raced to his side within seconds, but the man, who has not yet been named, was pronounced dead at a local hospital shortly afterward.  

It's currently unclear if the man's death is linked to the vaccine, with an investigation now underway.

Adverse reactions to the vaccine are considered extremely rare, with those few cases most commonly linked to an allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis. 

'Initial indications are that the man did not have any allergic reaction to the vaccine,' Zucker, however, said in his statement. 

The man, who was in his 70s, fell as he left Manhattan's Jacob Javits Convention Center (above) just 25 minutes after receiving his shot

The man, who was in his 70s, fell as he left Manhattan's Jacob Javits Convention Center (above) just 25 minutes after receiving his shot

Adverse reactions to the vaccine are considered extremely rare, with those few cases most commonly linked to an allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis (file photo)

Adverse reactions to the vaccine are considered extremely rare, with those few cases most commonly linked to an allergic reaction known as anaphylaxis (file photo) 

The man's sudden collapsing followed a mandatory 15-minute observation period, in which he 'exhibited no adverse reactions or any distress,' Zucker said. 

The FDNY said the patient was taken to the hospital by Senior Care just before 11am Sunday, where he died shortly after arriving. 

The identity of the man has not yet been revealed by officials. It's also unclear which type of COVID-19 vaccine he received.

The Javits Center and Zucker's office have not yet returned a DailyMail.com request for comment on the matter. 

In his statement, Zucker stressed that he and other public health experts believe the vaccine 'is safe, and together with continued vigilance including wearing a mask and social distancing, it will bring an end to this pandemic.'

'I encourage all eligible New Yorkers to get vaccinated,' Zucker continued. 

The Javits Center opened as a mass-vaccination site in January, and is one of several in the New York City area. It was originally used as a field hospital after the coronavirus pandemic first struck last spring.

Nearly one million people in New York City have so far been vaccinated, with 1.5 million residents having received their first doses statewide.

Across the US, the daily number of people getting vaccinated now well surpasses the numbers infected, with the country averaging 1.3 million shots per-day. 

Nearly 42 million doses have so far been administered in total. 

At least one dose of a vaccine has been administered to 31,579,100 million people, which equals to 9.6 percent of the population.

Just over 9,147,000 Americans have now received both doses of a vaccine, amounting to 2.78 percent of the population.

The Javits Center opened as a mass-vaccination site in January, and is one of several in the New York City area

The Javits Center opened as a mass-vaccination site in January, and is one of several in the New York City area

Adverse reactions to the vaccine are considered extremely rare, with those few cases most commonly linked to allergic reactions.

Since the vaccine rollout began in December, however, there have been a handful of so-far unexplained deaths involving those who recently received a COVID shot.  

Over the weekend, Virginia minister Drene Keyes, 58, died less than a day after receiving a dose of the Pfizer vaccine at a clinic in Warsaw on Friday and falling ill. 

Officials said they did not know her cause of death, of any underlying conditions Keyes might have had that could have contributed to it, and said there's no evidence to suggest her passing was tied to the vaccination. 

'Initial indications are that the man did not have any allergic reaction to the vaccine,' Zucker, however, said in his statement

'Initial indications are that the man did not have any allergic reaction to the vaccine,' Zucker, however, said in his statement

Similarly to Sunday's incident in New York City, Keyes remained at the clinic for 15 minutes after the shot, as recommended, before returning to the clinic later that day.

She was rushed to VCU Health Tappahannock Hospital, where she died Saturday.

'Preliminary findings indicate that the cause of death was not anaphylaxis, but it will take several weeks for additional information to become available,' Warsaw police Chief Joan Kent said. 

'We can confirm that the death occurred within hours of having received the vaccine, but that is not evidence of it being related. We are currently investigating and do not yet know the cause of death.'

Kent continued: 'Our thoughts are with the family during this heartbreaking time,' the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a statement. 'CDC continues to closely monitor the safety of all vaccines, and we are actively working with Virginia officials to fully investigate the situation.'

Over the weekend, Virginia minister Drene Keyes (right), 58, died less than a day after receiving a dose of the Pfizer vaccine at a clinic in Warsaw on Friday and falling ill

Over the weekend, Virginia minister Drene Keyes (right), 58, died less than a day after receiving a dose of the Pfizer vaccine at a clinic in Warsaw on Friday and falling ill

Similarly, in California last month, Tim Zook, a 60-year-old X-ray technologist at South Coast Global Medical Center in Santa Ana, died on January 7 two days after receiving his second dose of the Pfizer shot.

He had written on Facebook the day of his vaccination that he had 'never been so excited to get a shot before' and celebrating being 'fully vaccinated.'  

However, within hours the father-of-three reportedly suffered an apparent adverse reaction, telling co-workers he had sharp pains in his stomach and was having difficulties breathing.    

After his symptoms worsened, his coworkers walked him over to the emergency room where he was placed on a ventilator four hours after arriving.

The Orange County coroner said Zook's cause of death is currently inconclusive and further toxicology testing will take months to complete. If there is a correlation to the vaccine, the office said it will notify the OC Health Care Agency.

In a statement to DailyMail.com at the time, a Pfizer spokesperson said the company is aware of Zook’s death and is also investigating the matter.

Pfizer said: ‘Our immediate thoughts are with the bereaved family. We closely monitor all such events and collect relevant information to share with global regulatory authorities.

‘Based on ongoing safety reviews performed by Pfizer, BioNTech and health authorities, BNT162b2 retains a positive benefit-risk profile for the prevention of COVID-19 infections. Serious adverse events, including deaths that are unrelated to the vaccine, are unfortunately likely to occur at a similar rate as they would in the general population.’ 

Tim Zook (above with wife Rochelle), a 60-year-old X-ray technologist at South Coast Global Medical Center in Santa Ana died just two days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer jab

Tim Zook (above with wife Rochelle), a 60-year-old X-ray technologist at South Coast Global Medical Center in Santa Ana died just two days after receiving his second dose of Pfizer jab

Moments after he was given the vaccine, Zook wrote on Facebook: ¿Never been excited to get a shot before. I am now fully vaccinated after receiving my second Pfizer dose'

Moments after he was given the vaccine, Zook wrote on Facebook: ‘Never been excited to get a shot before. I am now fully vaccinated after receiving my second Pfizer dose'

Zook's wife, Rochelle Zook, told the Register her family was not ‘blaming any pharmaceutical company.'

‘My husband loved what he did,' she said. 'He worked in hospitals for 36 1/2 years. He believed in vaccines. I’m sure he would take that vaccine again, and he’d want the public to take it.

‘But when someone gets symptoms 2 1/2 hours after a vaccine, that’s a reaction. What else could have happened? We would like the public to know what happened to Tim, so he didn’t die in vain. Severe reactions are rare. In reality, COVID is a much more deadly force than reactions from the potential vaccine itself.

‘The message is, be safe, take the vaccine — but the officials need to do more research. We need to know the cause. The vaccines need to be as safe as possible. Every life matters.’

For the first time in three months on Sunday, the US reported fewer than 100,000 new daily COVID-19 cases, with hospitalizations also falling as the vaccine roll out gathers momentum.  

Just over 96,000 new cases and 1,474 deaths were reported nationwide on Sunday, according to a tally by the COVID Tracking Project.

Those latest numbers brought US totals to over 26.99 million cases and 463,339 deaths to date.

Hospitalizations also dropped with 81,439 patients admitted as of Sunday - the fourth consecutive day with under 90,000 after two months above that threshold.  

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMie2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtOTIzNzczNS9NYW4tNzBzLWNvbGxhcHNlcy1kaWVzLWp1c3QtMjUtbWludXRlcy1yZWNlaXZpbmctQ09WSUQtMTktdmFjY2luZS1OWUMuaHRtbNIBf2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtOTIzNzczNS9hbXAvTWFuLTcwcy1jb2xsYXBzZXMtZGllcy1qdXN0LTI1LW1pbnV0ZXMtcmVjZWl2aW5nLUNPVklELTE5LXZhY2NpbmUtTllDLmh0bWw?oc=5

2021-02-08 20:10:00Z
52781363458630

Donald Trump's impeachment Senate trial round two: Eight things to expect - Sky News

For the first time in history, a US president is due to be tried by members of the country's upper house for the second time.

Such was the anger among Democrats at the storming of the Capitol building in early January, they voted to impeach Donald Trump again, after the first impeachment vote in 2019 failed to convict him.

Amid the anger, it is a risky strategy: There were some who felt Mr Trump's escape from censure when he faced senators last time round invigorated his particular brand of conservatism, fuelling America's divisions.

Senate members are sworn in for the impeachment trial at the US Capitol. Pic: AP
Image: Senate members are sworn in for the impeachment trial at the US Capitol. Pic: AP

Last time, the 45th president faced accusations of abusing his power by pressuring Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden. At the time, the now 46th president was just a potential opponent in that year's presidential election. Mr Trump was acquitted by a majority of 52:48 for one charge and 53:47 for the second. Only one Republican voted against him on one of the charges.

At stake this time is not whether Mr Trump remains in office, as it was 12 months ago. He has left the White House. But, such is the fury at his four years in power, Democrats want to make sure he is barred from running from federal office again.

So, what can we expect this time?

1. A different charge

In 2020, Mr Trump faced two charges. 1. Abuse of power and 2. Obstruction of Congress.

The accusation this time around is that President Trump, engaged in an "incitement of insurrection", because his words encouraged the most violent attack on Congress in more than 200 years, in which five people died, including a police officer.

The Trump Mar-A-Lago estate in Palm Beach. Pic: AP
Image: The Trump Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach. Pic: AP

2. Probably no Trump at all

Last time, the president stayed in the White House or was travelling around the US and didn't attend the hearing, presumably claiming he was too busy running the country.

This time it might be expected that, as he is no longer commander-in-chief, he might pop down to the Senate chamber to hear the arguments against him. But that is not so, say analysts predicting what is going to happen.

The most likely location from where he will observe what is taking place, if anywhere, will be his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, where he has been since he left Washington DC and where he has been seen playing golf.

He was requested to testify, but his lawyers refused on his behalf.

And, compared to last time, when he provided regular commentary through his Twitter feed, trial watchers may have to tune into the lesser-known platform Gab, as the former president has since been suspended from other social media.

3. It shouldn't last as long, in theory

The last trial, just over a year ago, lasted a total of two weeks and six days.

This time analysts say the proceedings are expected to diverge from the lengthy, complicated trial that resulted in an acquittal.

Some remained unhappy that Mr Trump was acquitted in 2020. Pic: AP
Image: Some remained unhappy that Mr Trump was acquitted in 2020. Pic: AP

Experts say the trial could be over in half the time, but it may be complicated by other events. A one-day pause will last from Friday evening to Saturday evening in order to allow a Trump lawyer to observe the Jewish Sabbath and the Senate is not currently scheduled to be in session during the week starting 15 February.

Details of the proceedings are still being negotiated by the Senate leaders, with the length of opening arguments, questions and deliberations all up for discussion.

4. Not many, if any, witnesses

The US news agency AP says it appears there will be few witnesses called, with prosecutors and defence lawyers instead speaking directly to senators

This is unsurprising as most of the senators, who have sworn to be impartial, are are actually among the witnesses to the siege. In fact, many fled for their safety as the rioters broke into the Capitol and temporarily halted the electoral count certifying Joe Biden's victory.

Donald Trump supporters storm the US Capitol
Image: The prosecution are expected to highlight the role Donald Trump had on the day

5. Prosecutors using emotional appeals

So, without the need to cross examine witnesses to a largely secret event, as was the conversation Mr Trump had in which he was said to have solicited a "quid pro quo" arrangement with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelenskiy, prosecutors are this time expected to use a mass of video evidence of events during and before the Capitol storming.

Adam Schiff, the Democratic Congressman who led the prosecution against Mr Trump in 2020, said: "There will already be over 100 witnesses present", referring to the senators in the chamber.

Mr Trump's tweets and other statements in public will also be under scrutiny, with House managers leading the prosecution likely to present the former president's incendiary rhetoric refusing to concede the election.

U.S. Capitol Police with guns drawn watch as protesters try to break into the House Chamber at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Image: The events of 6 January will be relived by many in the chamber. Pic: AP

6. Defence to emphasise procedure

Mr Trump's new defence team says it plans to hit back at prosecution attempts to sway senators with its own array of videos of Democratic politicians making fiery speeches of the type they accuse Mr Trump of making.

They will also pick apart justification for the impeachment trial, claiming that it is unconstitutional. It will expand on a line of attack that has already proved successful, with an earlier vote to set the impeachment aside as unconstitutional because the president is no longer in office, winning the support of 44 other Republican senators.

Their arguments are likely to underline the importance of free speech in the US constitution, with comments from Senator Paul Rand possibly hinting at some of the themes when he said: "If we're going to criminalize speech, and somehow impeach everybody who says, 'Go fight to hear your voices heard', I mean really we ought to impeach Chuck Schumer then."

Finally, they have said that they will assert that supporters of Mr Trump who stormed the Capitol did so of their own accord, not because Mr Trump encouraged them to.

People shelter in the House gallery as protesters try to break into the House Chamber
Image: Senators who will no doubt remember having to shelter will debate whether impeachment is unconstitutional. Pic: AP

7. Acquittal likely, but Republicans split

The vote last month to set aside the trial in which just five senators joined Democrats in the upper house to reject it has left many observers feeling a guilty verdict has little chance of success.

In order to be convicted, 67 senators have to find Mr Trump guilty - with at least 17 of those being Republican, assuming all 50 Democrats in the Senate vote to convict.

While some of those who voted to set aside the impeachment trial in January have said they continue to have an open mind, most are expected to back the former president.

According to the Washington Post on 26 January, 37 Republican senators are opposed to conviction - enough for Mr Trump to be acquitted.

Some of the internal damage from the aftermath of the riot
Image: The prosecution will likely remind senators of the damage that was caused to their building

8. Impact to be felt for some time

If Mr Trump is convicted, it will still take another vote - this time by simple majority - to bar him from running for office again. He can still, of course, remain involved in politics in other ways - as a figurehead for the form of politics he has branded as his own during the last five years. There are rumours he will continue in television. His family may also run for office.

But, if he is acquitted again, some Democrat-leaning commentators are concerned there may be greater consequences.

Some say an acquittal could be interpreted as a condonance of not just the actions of Mr Trump, but potentially anyone who advanced similar points of view, however wrong. And, in America's currently febrile political atmosphere, this could have an unpredictable legacy.

It could also have a impact on the Grand Old Party (GOP), as the Republicans are known, which is already at risk of splintering over whether to persist with Trumpism, or to reclaim its traditional, more internationalist values.

Liz Cheney, the daughter of former vice president Dick Cheney and currently House Republican Conference Chair - the third-highest position in the House Republican leadership - has already faced an attempt to remove her because she supported Mr Trump's impeachment. And there are other internal battles ongoing. Mr Trump's escape from punishment could empower those who want the GOP to continue down the path he embarked upon.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMia2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2RvbmFsZC10cnVtcHMtaW1wZWFjaG1lbnQtc2VuYXRlLXRyaWFsLXJvdW5kLXR3by1laWdodC10aGluZ3MtdG8tZXhwZWN0LTEyMjEyNDM20gFvaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2RvbmFsZC10cnVtcHMtaW1wZWFjaG1lbnQtc2VuYXRlLXRyaWFsLXJvdW5kLXR3by1laWdodC10aGluZ3MtdG8tZXhwZWN0LTEyMjEyNDM2?oc=5

2021-02-08 19:28:21Z
52781349573162

Myanmar Coup: two major cities put under curfew - BBC News - BBC News

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Myanmar Coup: two major cities put under curfew - BBC News  BBC News
  2. Myanmar coup leader defends action amid mass protests  BBC News
  3. Protests sweep Myanmar to oppose coup and support Aung San Suu Kyi  Guardian News
  4. Myanmar and India’s crackdowns on social media sites are appalling  The Washington Post
  5. Myanmar military ruler addresses nation as protests intensify  Al Jazeera English
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9aGRtRTROZEtBYW_SAQA?oc=5

2021-02-08 18:07:49Z
52781362295733

Trump impeachment: Supporters rioted 'of their own accord' - BBC News

Donald Trump encouraged supporters to "walk down to the Capitol" on 6 January
Reuters

Lawyers for Donald Trump have responded to his impeachment charges, saying that supporters of the former US president stormed Congress on 6 January of their own accord.

Mr Trump's trial in the Senate is due to begin on Tuesday after he was impeached for the second time by the House of Representatives last month.

He is charged with "inciting insurrection" in a speech to supporters in Washington DC ahead of the riot.

Mr Trump says he will not testify.

Five people, including a police officer, died when a mob of Trump supporters attacked the Capitol building, forcing politicians and staff to hide in offices.

In a pre-trial brief released on Monday, the former president's lawyers said that FBI documents had shown that the riot was planned days in advance, meaning that Mr Trump cannot have encouraged the violence.

They also insist the trial is unconstitutional because Mr Trump has left office and is now a private citizen.

They hit out at the nine "impeachment managers" - Democrats from the House of Representatives who will lay out the case for prosecution - accusing them of "intellectual dishonesty and factual vacuity" in the way they portrayed Mr Trump's address to his supporters.

"This impeachment proceeding was never about seeking justice," the lawyers wrote.

"Instead, this was only ever a selfish attempt by Democratic leadership in the House to prey upon the feelings of horror and confusion that fell upon all Americans across the entire political spectrum upon seeing the destruction at the Capitol on January 6 by a few hundred people."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS01NTk4NzU2MNIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC93b3JsZC11cy1jYW5hZGEtNTU5ODc1NjA?oc=5

2021-02-08 17:00:00Z
52781349573162