Senin, 21 Oktober 2019

U.S. Troops Cross Into Iraq as They Withdraw From Syria - The Wall Street Journal

A convoy of U.S. vehicles at the Iraqi-Syrian border crossing on the outskirts of Duhok, Iraq, on Monday. Photo: ari jalal/Reuters

SHEIKHAN, Iraq—Civilians in Kurdish areas hurled rotten fruit and insults at a convoy of U.S. military vehicles that crossed from northern Syria into Iraq early Monday, marking a dramatic drawdown to an American presence there to combat Islamic State.

A Wall Street Journal reporter saw around a dozen armored vehicles on the road near Sheikhan in northern Iraq flying American flags. Stony-faced U.S. soldiers flashed victory signs for the camera.

They appeared to be part of a larger convoy that passed through the town of Duhok about 37 miles from the Syrian border earlier Monday. A witness there heard onlookers in the predominantly Kurdish city curse the soldiers. One man called them “sons of bitches” and shouted at them to get out, he said.

The convoy faced the greatest hostility inside Syria, as it left. A video posted by the dominant political party in northeast Syria, the Democratic Union Party, showed demonstrators temporarily blocking the convoy with hand-drawn signs, including one that read: “To the US Army who are leaving northeast Syria now tell your children that the children of the Kurds were killed by the Turks and we did nothing to protect them.”

Footage posted by television network ABC’s Adam Harvey showed young men throwing stones and rotten fruit at the convoy.

The withdrawal is seen as a historic betrayal by the Kurds, who partnered with U.S. troops in Syria to fight Islamic State. The U.S. presence had served as a buffer against Turkey, which regards the Kurdish fighters as terrorists.

More than 200 civilians have been killed since Turkey launched a cross-border offensive nearly two weeks ago to seize territory and create a safe zone spanning its border with Syria, a campaign that also has displacing hundreds of thousands of people.

Some U.S. troops left Syria before Monday, but the convoy appeared to be the largest movement since President Trump’s decision to pull troops from northeast Syria.

Iraqi officials didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment on the relocation of American troops. The U.S. already has around 5,000 troops in Iraq, many of whom are based in the western province of Anbar.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

What are the regional implications of moving U.S. troops from Syria into Iraq? Join the conversation below.

U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper said late Saturday that all of the roughly 1,000 U.S. troops ordered to leave northeastern Syria would be redeployed to western Iraq and conduct operations against the Islamic State extremist group from there.

American troops are leaving Syria via helicopters, planes and ground convoys, a process that will be completed within weeks, Mr. Esper said. He didn’t say where precisely those troops would go.

However, U.S. officials said Sunday that President Trump is considering keeping a few hundred troops in northeast Syria after the bulk of the force leaves, which would be another twist after years of policy gyrations over the country.

The residual force would help prevent President Bashar al-Assad’s troops or Russian forces from taking control of Syria’s oil fields, which are mainly in Kurdish-held territory in the northeast. It would also enable the military to retain a foothold in the fight against Islamic State.

Turkey agreed with the U.S. on Thursday to a five-day truce, during which the Syrian Kurds are expected to depart from an area Ankara has defined as a safe zone along the nations’ border. Both sides have accused each other of violating the cease-fire, but the fighting subsided over the weekend.

Related Video

Footage shows smoke rising from a Syrian town as fighting broke out along the country's border with Turkey on Friday. Hours earlier, Vice President Mike Pence announced that Turkey had agreed to suspend military operations for five days as part of a cease-fire deal.

The withdrawing U.S. forces benefited from the lull in fighting. A U.S. convoy entered Syria from northern Iraq on Sunday to help evacuate personnel and equipment. After coordinating with other players in the region to make sure U.S. forces wouldn’t be attacked, they left Kobane and began moving east toward Iraq.

The withdrawal has left a vacuum for the Syrian government and its Russian and Iranian backers to fill, as the Assad regime seeks to reassert control over most of the country after eight years of civil war.

As U.S. forces vacated positions in several areas, including Manbij, Raqqa, Tabqa and Kobane, Syrian regime forces moved in alongside Kurdish fighters, local activists said.

Syrian government forces were on the outskirts of Kobane on Sunday afternoon, accompanied by Kurdish fighters dressed in regime uniforms, said Suhaib Jaber, who heads Euphrates Post, an independent war monitor.


Syria’s Deadly Conflict

Eight years in the country’s violent, multi-sided war

 
 
2011: Anti-Syrian regime protesters during a March 25 demonstration in Damascus.
MUZAFFAR SALMAN/ASSOCIATED PRESS
1 of 8

Write to Sune Engel Rasmussen at sune.rasmussen@wsj.com and Isabel Coles at isabel.coles@wsj.com

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-troops-cross-into-iraq-as-they-withdraw-from-syria-11571649101

2019-10-21 11:34:00Z
52780414092298

Speaker of Parliament may scupper Boris Johnson's Brexit plan as deadline nears - NBCNews.com

LONDON — Prime Minister Boris Johnson's attempts to force a Brexit plan through Parliament this week could be foiled by the outspoken House of Commons Speaker John Bercow on Monday.

With Johnson facing another crunch week in Britain's ongoing Brexit saga, and after the prime minister hammered out a deal with the European Union, Bercow could refuse to allow the vote because rules generally bar considering the same measure for a second time during the same session of Parliament unless something has changed.

Oct. 19, 201901:57

Bercow — who is known for his efforts to impose calm on the tumultuous chamber with bellows of "Order! Order!" — said on Saturday that he was blindsided by the government's debate proposal.

Bercow is scheduled to make a statement shortly after Parliament opens at 2:30 p.m (9:30 a.m. ET).

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

Johnson, who has staked his political career on leaving the European Union on Oct. 31, had hoped his divorce plan would have been voted on in an extraordinary parliamentary session on Saturday. But, as with much to do with Brexit, the session did not go as planned.

Johnson was ambushed by rebel lawmakers who forced the government to ask Europe for another extension — something Johnson once vowed he’d rather be “dead in a ditch” than do.

Johnson sent a letter Saturday to Brussels asking for an extension but in a move that highlights the strained norms of British statecraft, he did not sign it and immediately sent a second saying he doesn’t really want an extension.

European officials haven’t yet given their answer to the request for more time to get the deal through Parliament. European leaders of the other 27 member states will be conflicted between their desire to put the Brexit issue to bed and a wish to avoid the U.K. crashing out of the E.U. without a deal at all. It is expected that they will agree to an extension.

House of Commons Speaker John Bercow address the chamber on Saturday.UK Parliament / Reuters

Whatever happens the other side of the English channel, British government ministers have reaffirmed Johnson’s intention to leave the European Union on Oct. 31 come what may and said they believed they had the numbers to get the divorce deal through Parliament this week.

“We seem to have the numbers in the House of Commons, why hasn’t Parliament pushed this through? That’s what we’re going to do next week,” Foreign Secretary Dominc Raab told the BBC on Sunday.

Raab added that the government would continue to speak to the government’s Northern Irish allies, the Democratic Unionist Party, which currently opposes the deal because it treats Northern Ireland differently to the rest of the U.K.

The support of the DUP, which has 10 seats in Parliament, would give Johnson a better chance of passing his deal.

The new deal replaces an earlier divorce plan negotiated by former Prime Minister Theresa May that was rejected three times by Parliament. It comes as Britain’s opposition Labour party has called for a second referendum on whether Britain should even leave the European Union.

The tense start to the parliamentary week also comes as Scotland’s highest court is due to consider whether Johnson intentionally set out to block Parliament’s intent by not signing the first letter and sending a second, even if he technically complied with what was legally required of him, according to the Associated Press.

Associated Press and Reuters contributed.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/boris-johnson-aims-push-brexit-deal-through-parliament-deadline-nears-n1069306

2019-10-21 10:33:00Z
52780406083772

U.S. soldiers who fought alongside Kurds blast Trump's Syria retreat - Reuters

(Reuters) - In the summer of 2004, U.S. soldier Greg Walker drove to a checkpoint just outside of Baghdad’s Green Zone with his Kurdish bodyguard, Azaz. When he stepped out of his SUV, three Iraqi guards turned him around at gunpoint.

Mark Giaconia, who served for 20 years in the U.S. Army, of which 15 years in the U.S. Special Forces and was embedded with the Kurds in Iraq, poses for a photograph at his house in Herndon, Virginia, U.S., October 19, 2019. Picture taken October 19, 2019. REUTERS/Carlos Jasso

As he walked back to the vehicle, he heard an AK-47 being racked and a hail of cursing in Arabic and Kurdish. He turned to see Azaz facing off with the Iraqis.

“Let us through or I’ll kill you all,” Walker recalled his Kurdish bodyguard telling the Iraqi soldiers, who he described as “terrified.”

He thought to himself: “This is the kind of ally and friend I want.”

Now retired and living in Portland, Oregon, the 66-year-old former Army Special Forces soldier is among legions of U.S. servicemembers with a deep gratitude and respect for Kurdish fighters they served alongside through the Iraq war and, more recently, conflicts with the Islamic State. So he was “furious” when President Donald Trump this month abruptly decided to pull 1,000 U.S. troops from northeast Syria, clearing the way for Turkey to move in on Kurdish-controlled territory.

Walker’s rage was echoed in Reuters interviews with a half dozen other current and former U.S. soldiers who have served with Kurdish forces. Mark Giaconia, a 46-year-old former U.S. Army special forces soldier, recalled similar camaraderie with the Kurds he fought with in Iraq more than a decade ago.

“I trusted them with my life,” said Giaconia, who now lives in Herndon, Virginia, after retiring from the Army with 20 years of service. “I fought with these guys and watched them die for us.”

The Trump administration’s decision to “leave them hanging” stirred deep emotions, Giaconia said.

“It’s like a violation of trust,” he said.

The White House declined to comment.

BIPARTISAN CRITICISM

Trump’s abrupt decision to pull back U.S. troops from along the Syria-Turkey border allowed Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan to launch an offensive into the region aimed at creating a 20 mile (32 km) “safe zone” clear of the Kurdish YPG militia. The Kurdish fighters had been Washington’s main ally in the region but the Turkish government regards them as a terrorist group.

In the face of criticism from both Democrats and his own Republicans, Trump defended the move, saying that it fulfilled a campaign promise to reduce foreign troop presence and asserting that the Kurds were “not angels.”

The Kurds pivoted quickly, allying themselves with Syria to try to hold off the Turkish onslaught.

Trump then sent Vice President Michael Pence to Ankara to negotiate a pause in the fighting that the United States said would allow the Kurds to pull back from the area Turkey aimed to take, and which Turkey said achieved the main goal of the assault it launched Oct. 9.

Congressional Republicans - including Senator Lindsey Graham, normally a staunch Trump ally - fretted that the move would risk allowing the Islamic State militant group to resurge.

“Congress is going to speak with a very firm, singular voice,” Graham said at a Thursday news conference to unveil legislation to impose new sanctions on the Turkish government. He said the “Turkish outrage” would lead to the re-emergence of Islamic State, the destruction of an ally - the Kurds - and eventually benefit Iran at the expense of Israel.

The House of Representatives voted 354 to 60 last week to condemn Trump’s decision to withdraw U.S. forces from northeastern Syria - a rare case of Republicans voting en masse against Trump. A Senate vote on the resolution was blocked, however, by Republican Senator Rand Paul.

Paul, a senator from Kentucky, has voiced his support Trump’s withdrawal of troops, saying during a Senate hearing on Thursday that “the Constitution is quite clear, no authorization has ever been given for the use of forces in Syria.”

HISTORY OF ‘BETRAYAL’

Some of the U.S. soldiers interviewed by Reuters pointed out that the United States has history of forging alliances with Kurdish forces only to later abandon them. In the 1970s, the administration of President Richard Nixon secretly agreed to funnel money to Iraqi Kurds fighting for autonomy from Iraq, only to drop that aid after Iraq and Iran reached a peace treaty to end border disputes in 1975.

Likewise after the 1991 Gulf War, a Kurdish uprising against Iraqi President Saddam Hussein eventually led to a brutal crackdown after U.S. forces left the region.

Those incidents came up often among Kurds who fought alongside a U.S. Army soldier who did several tours in the Middle East.

“Even then, they were bringing up the 1991 betrayal of the Kurds. This idea of betraying the Kurds was something that was very, very front of mind,” said the soldier, who spoke on the condition of anonymity since he is still in the military. “There was definitely some skepticism of our support of them long term.”

Kurds have come to know betrayal, said Kardos Dargala, a 38-year-old Iraqi Kurd whose relationship with the U.S. military dates back to 2004 and the second U.S. invasion of Iraq.

“Feeling betrayed, throughout history it is a very familiar pattern,” said Dargala, who worked as a security contractor for the U.S. military until 2008 - when he immigrated to the United States, joined the U.S. Army, and was deployed to Afghanistan.

Slideshow (7 Images)

Dargala, a U.S. citizen, was injured multiple times in combat. He returned to Iraq earlier this year to spend time with family members who are unable to travel to the United States.

The president’s withdrawal of troops from Syria left him in disbelief. Dargala said Trump’s decision ran counter to U.S. values and interests and sent the wrong message to its allies.

“The path the president is on,” he said, “is a very destructive path.”

Reporting by Maria Caspani in New York; Writing by Scott Malone; Editing by Brian Thevenot

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN1X00ZO

2019-10-21 10:06:00Z
52780414092298

Boris Johnson pushes for Brexit vote after British Parliament's snub - USA TODAY

LONDON – Prime Minister Boris Johnson is hoping British lawmakers on Monday will vote on and pass a Brexit withdrawal agreement he negotiated with the European Union after a weekend vote was sabotaged by opposition and rebel parliamentarians. 

In an unexpected twist to Brexit's months-long stalemate, parliamentarians Saturday forced Johnson to ask the EU for an extension to his Oct. 31 Brexit deadline.

They want more time to scrutinize the legislation and to make sure there is sufficient time to implement it so a so-called no-deal Brexit can be completely ruled out. 

'Bewildering, disastrous':: Queen has a Brexit escape plan, but how bad will it be?

Johnson was forced by law to send a letter to the EU requesting an extension, which the EU has not yet granted, but he did not sign it and he made it clear that he was against any form of postponement to leaving the 28-nation bloc by Halloween. 

Now Johnson wants Parliament to hold the vote on Monday. However, that is up to Speaker of the House of Commons John Bercow, who has not yet approved it.

Johnson's government could also try to push ahead with implementing legislation for the deal he agreed with the EU before Parliament has indicated whether it will approve it, although for Brexit to happen lawmakers will need to first pass judgment on the de, according to Tim Bale, a professor of politics at Queen Mary, University of London. 

A vote in Parliament on Johnson's deal is theoretically the last major obstacle to winning approval for Britain's exit from the EU three years after a national referendum that has divided Britain. Theresa May stepped down as prime minister after repeatedly failing to get lawmakers to approve her divorce deal. And her predecessor, David Cameron, resigned after failing to predict the political chaos that Brexit would leash. 

Johnson's deal resembles May's, although he has replaced the "backstop" – measures to prevent a post-Brexit return to a "hard" border between EU member Ireland and Northern Ireland, which is part of the United Kingdom – with "alternative arrangements" that allow some customs checks to take place on the UK mainland.

Frictionless trade between Ireland and Northern Ireland is one of the things that underpins the Good Friday Agreement, a peace deal between the British and Irish governments, and most of the political parties in Northern Ireland. 

Under a so-called no-deal Brexit, many of the laws and regulations that have governed Britain's four-decade relationship with the EU, from trade to security, would effectively evaporate overnight. Economists believe that it would significantly harm Britain's economy and threaten chaos on its borders. The British government claims that it has made adequate emergency preparations to cover just-in-time supply chains on which Britain relies for access to some fresh foods and essential medicines. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2019/10/21/brexit-boris-johnson-eu-deal-vote-after-parliament-snub/4050791002/

2019-10-21 07:43:00Z
52780406083772

British PM pushes for Brexit deal vote after being forced to seek delay - Reuters

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister Boris Johnson will again try to put his Brexit deal to a vote in parliament on Monday after he was forced by his opponents to send a letter seeking a delay from the European Union.

Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks ahead of a vote on his renegotiated Brexit deal, on what has been dubbed "Super Saturday", in the House of Commons in London, Britain October 19, 2019. ©UK Parliament/Jessica Taylor/Handout via REUTERS

With just 10 days left until the United Kingdom is due to leave the EU on Oct. 31, the divorce is again in disarray as Britain’s political class argue over whether to leave with a deal, exit without a deal or hold another referendum.

Johnson was ambushed by opponents in parliament on Saturday who demanded a change to the sequencing of the ratification of the deal, exposing the prime minister to a law which demanded he request a delay until Jan. 31.

In a twist that illustrates the extent to which Brexit has strained the norms of British statecraft, Johnson sent the note to the EU unsigned - and added another signed letter arguing against what he cast as a deeply corrosive delay.

“A further extension would damage the interests of the UK and our EU partners, and the relationship between us,” Johnson said his own letter, signed “Boris Johnson”.

The British government insisted on Sunday the country will leave the EU on Oct. 31, and plans to put the deal to a vote in parliament later on Monday though it is unclear if the House of Commons speaker will allow such a vote.

The government has proposed a debate on the deal, according to the House of Commons order paper which says the speaker will make a statement on the proceedings shortly after parliament opens at 1330 GMT.

Speaker John Bercow is thought to be unlikely to allow it on the grounds that this would repeat Saturday’s debate, but he has not yet given his formal decision.

Sterling, which has rallied more than 6% since Oct. 10, slid from five-month highs on Monday. It hit as low as $1.2850 in Asian trading before settling around $1.2920 GBP=D3 in London, down 0.5% on the day.

Goldman Sachs raised the probability of the United Kingdom leaving with a ratified deal to 70% from 65%, cut its view of the chances of a “no-deal” Brexit to 5% from 10% and left its view on no Brexit at all unchanged at 25%.

BREXIT DELAY?

The EU, which has grappled with the tortuous Brexit crisis since Britons voted 52%-48% to leave in a 2016 referendum, was clearly bewildered by the contradictory signals from London.

With Brexit up in the air, the bloc’s ambassadors decided on Sunday to play for time rather than rush to decide on Johnson’s request.

From the EU’s point of view, extension options range from just an additional month until the end of November to half a year or longer.

“We’re looking for more clarity towards the end of the week, hoping that by that time we will also see how things develop in London,” one senior EU diplomat said.

It was unlikely that the EU’s 27 remaining member states would refuse Britain’s request to delay once again its departure, given the impact on all parties of a no-deal Brexit.

In London, Johnson’s ministers said they were confident they had the numbers to push a deal through parliament where opponents were plotting to derail the deal he had assured the EU that he could ratify.

The opposition Labour Party was planning changes to the deal that would make it unacceptable to swathes of Johnson’s own party including a proposals for another referendum.

Johnson’s former allies, the Northern Irish Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) have indicated they could back a proposal for a customs union with the EU - a step that, if passed, would doom Johnson’s deal, The Daily Telegraph reported.

“Foolish or mendacious members of parliament have continually moved the goalposts and taken away the compression of a deadline,” hardline Brexit supporter Steve Baker said.

If Johnson’s deal is wrecked just days before the United Kingdom’s planned departure, it would leave Johnson a choice: leave without a deal or accept a delay.

Writing by Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Toby Chopra and Angus MacSwan

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-eu/pm-pushes-for-brexit-deal-vote-after-being-forced-to-seek-delay-idUSKBN1X00M5

2019-10-21 07:21:00Z
52780406083772

Chile protests: Curfew extended as chaos in capital - Al Jazeera English

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7u_iz4YIB6Y

2019-10-21 05:40:01Z
52780412809585

Minggu, 20 Oktober 2019

Nigel Farage says anger over Brexit deal is 'unlike anything I have ever seen before' - Fox News

Former United Kingdom Independence Party leader Nigel Farage, who launched the Brexit campaign in the U.K., said Sunday that the anger among British voters regarding the latest developments with the Brexit deal is “unlike anything I have ever seen before.”

Appearing on “Fox & Friends” from London on Sunday morning, Farage said he believes the country still wants to leave the European Union; however, members or Parliament “have broken all promises they made to the people.”

“They promised that Brexit would be delivered and actually there’s pretty much a majority in that place who really do not want us to leave the European Union, don’t want us to become an independent country and they have now for over three years frustrated every attempt to get Brexit delivered,” Farage said.

“We have this big, hard deadline of Halloween, October 31. We are supposed to leave then. It now looks unlikely that we will, so as you can probably imagine the anger that is building amongst British voters is unlike anything I have ever seen before.”

BREXIT VOTE DERAILED AT LAST MINUTE BY REBEL LAWMAKERS; BORIS JOHNSON PLEDGES NOT TO NEGOTIATE A DELAY

In a major blow to British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, U.K. lawmakers voted Saturday to postpone a decision on whether to back his Brexit deal with the European Union, throwing a wrench into government plans to leave the bloc at the end of the month.

At a special session of Parliament intended to ratify the deal, lawmakers voted 322-306 to withhold their approval until legislation to implement it has been passed.

The vote aims to ensure that the United Kingdom can’t crash out of the EU without a divorce deal on the scheduled October 31 departure date.

As required by law, Johnson sent an unsigned letter to the EU late Saturday seeking a delay to Britain’s upcoming Oct. 31 departure from the bloc, but then sent a signed letter saying he does not favor another Brexit extension.

“My view, and the government’s position, (is) that a further extension would damage the interests of the U.K. and our EU partners, and the relationship between us,” Johnson wrote to European Council President Donald Tusk.

BREXIT BREAKTHROUGH? BORIS JOHNSON AGREES 'GREAT NEW DEAL' WITH EU

Johnson has long stated that he plans to take the U.K. out of the EU on Oct. 31 come what may, and his minister in charge of Brexit again emphasized that position.

Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, said Tusk would consult with other leaders “in the next days.”

Johnson is expected to return to Parliament on Monday to keep mustering up support for his Brexit proposal, which was approved by EU leaders on Thursday.

On Saturday, hundreds of thousands of anti-Brexit demonstrators marched to Parliament Square in London, insisting on a new referendum on whether Britain should stay or leave the EU.

“I think the honest truth of it is, the only likely way we’ve got of sorting this out is to have a general election and to allow the public to show their disgust at these MP’s [Members of Parliament] who stood in the way of Brexit,” Farage said on Sunday. “So I want there very much to be a general election before too long and then I think we can get some resolution.”

CLICK HERE FOR THE FOX NEWS APP

When asked if he thinks Johnson can survive, Farage said, “I think he can and I think at a general election, if he holds his nerve, he’d win it.”

Fox News’ Julia Musto and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/world/nigel-farage-says-the-anger-among-british-voters-regarding-brexit-deal-is-unlike-anything-i-have-ever-seen-before

2019-10-20 13:59:54Z
52780406083772