Minggu, 12 April 2020

Oil-Producing Countries Reach Final Deal to Cut Output - The New York Times

HOUSTON — Oil-producing nations on Sunday agreed to the largest production cut ever negotiated, in an unprecedented coordinated effort by Russia, Saudi Arabia and the United States to stabilize oil prices and, indirectly, global financial markets.

Saudi Arabia and Russia typically take the lead in setting global production goals. But President Trump, facing a re-election campaign, a plunging economy and American oil companies struggling with collapsing prices, took the unusual step of getting involved after the two countries entered a price war a month ago. Mr. Trump had made an agreement a key priority.

It was unclear, however, whether the cuts would be enough to bolster prices. Before the coronavirus crisis, 100 million barrels of oil each day fueled global commerce, but demand is down about 35 percent. While significant, the cuts agreed to on Sunday still fall far short of what is needed to bring oil production in line with demand.

The plan by OPEC, Russia and other allied producers in a group known as OPEC Plus will slash 9.7 million barrels a day in May and June, or close to 10 percent of the world’s output.

While the planned cut is slightly smaller than a tentative pact reached last Thursday, the deal should bring some relief to struggling economies in the Middle East and Africa and global oil companies, including American firms that directly and indirectly employ 10 million workers. Analysts expect oil prices, which soared above $100 a barrel only six years ago, to remain below $40 for the foreseeable future. The American oil benchmark price was just over $23 a barrel on Sunday night.

“This is at least a temporary relief for the energy industry and for the global economy,” said Per Magnus Nysveen, head of analysis for Rystad Energy, a Norwegian consultancy. “The industry is too big to be let to fail.”

The agreement reached on Sunday was the result of more than a week of telephone conversations involving Mr. Trump; the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman; and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.

Negotiations hit a snag when Mexico refused to go along with an agreement fashioned by Russia and Saudi Arabia, saying it would cut just 100,000 barrels a day and not 400,000. Saudi Arabia strongly resisted Mexico’s position, worrying that if Mexico could balk others would follow.

Mr. Trump supported President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, giving vague promises he would make up the difference, and helped coax the Saudis and Russians not to abandon the tentative agreement.

It was not immediately clear if the Trump administration made a formal commitment to cut production in the United States, but with prices plummeting, many companies in the country have already reduced output. There is no international mechanism to strictly enforce such production agreements and cheating is common.

Big oil nations that are not members of OPEC Plus, like Canada, Brazil and Norway, along with the United States, have been cutting production. The Energy Department has said that American oil production will fall by at least two million barrels a day by the end of the year. Other analysts say the eventual cut could be three million barrels a day out of the 13.3 million barrels a day produced at the beginning of the year. President Trump has expressed interest in buying oil to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to further reduce supplies.

The oil crisis began a month ago when Russia refused to go along with cuts promoted by Saudi Arabia and other OPEC producers. In response, Saudi Arabia said it would increase production by three million barrels a day and flood the market. Oil prices and global stock markets fell sharply on the news.

The Russian and Saudi reversal in the last few days was an acknowledgment that their gamble was causing self-inflicted economic wounds.

“There were miscalculations on both sides,” said Ben Cahill, a senior energy fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “The Russians miscalculated how sharp the Saudi response would be and they might have been taken aback by how deep the price drop was.”

The change in course should give a lifeline to American companies as they invest far less in exploration and production.

“Hopefully, the American oil industry has avoided a worst-case scenario,” said Amy Myers Jaffe, an energy and Middle East expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. “There still will be bankruptcies, but for the time being, the fears that there would be a wholesale destruction of the industry can now be put aside, because the worst of the price war has passed.”

It is possible oil prices will sink again in the coming days if traders are not satisfied with the new cuts. In fact, on Thursday, the last day that oil futures traded, the price fell sharply even though a deal was close.

“The agreement provides the expectation of stability,” Rene Ortiz, Ecuador’s energy minister and a former secretary general of OPEC, said in an interview on Sunday. “But whether the markets react accordingly is a different ballgame.”

With the pandemic crushing economies around the world, few buyers were available in recent weeks to buy the cheap Saudi crude. The kingdom stored some oil in Egypt and was forced to let unsold crude sit in tankers along its coasts.

The mounting glut became a threat to Saudi government finances. At a projected average price of $34 a barrel this year, Rystad Energy estimated the kingdom’s revenues would drop by 50 percent compared with 2019, a loss of $105 billion.

Saudi Arabia still has foreign reserves of $500 billion, but that has shrunk from $740 billion in 2013. Several years of depressed oil prices had already forced the kingdom to borrow money and reduce energy subsidies for citizens. Prince Mohammed is now counting on his reserves to help diversify the Saudi economy for the future.

Russia is in far better shape financially than Saudi Arabia, especially with a flexible exchange rate — as the ruble depreciates, the value of its exports rises. While it would also lose billions of dollars in revenues with the drop in oil prices, the government has a much lower fiscal deficit than Saudi Arabia and has $550 billion in foreign reserves.

But Russia has other liabilities. It has limited processing capacity and its refineries have insufficient storage facilities. European demand has collapsed, and while China is still buying oil, at bargain prices, its storage will be filled up in another month or so, leaving Russian crude stranded.

With thousands of Soviet-era oil and gas wells in western Siberia, Russia would have faced the prospect of shutting down and later turning back on wells that are costly to manage, and in the process might permanently limit the amount of oil recoverable in the future.

Uncertainties abound for the industry as the pandemic disrupts global economies.

Members of OPEC and their allies entered talks last week hoping that the United States, Canada and other Western producers would agree to explicit cuts, adding up to four million or five million barrels a day. Instead, American officials just made assurances that crude output would be reduced over time, on top of voluntary reductions that have already begun at some U.S. companies. The agreement announced on Sunday will tapers into a 7.7-million-barrel-a-day cut from July to December and then to 5.8 million barrels a day from January 2021 to April 2022.

American oil companies are already eliminating thousands of jobs, plugging old wells and decommissioning rigs and fracking equipment in preparation for the worst downturn in more than a generation. While American consumers are saving at the gas pump, oil-producing states like Texas, Oklahoma and North Dakota are expecting deep losses in jobs and tax revenue.

Industry executives predict a wave of consolidation, in which small, indebted companies are either bought by larger ones or merge.

“There will be some companies that won’t survive,” said Trent Latshaw, president of Latshaw Drilling, an oil service company active in Texas and Oklahoma. “But the industry in general will survive and come out of this stronger. We will have to make hard decisions, innovate and we’ll become smarter because of this.”

The American industry was last shaken up in 2014, when Saudi Arabia and its OPEC allies flooded the market with oil in an effort to undercut American shale producers who were grabbing market share from them. Prices crashed and hundreds of American companies went out of business, and 170,000 jobs were lost. While American production briefly dropped, it quickly recovered and grew.

The coronavirus is a new and bigger challenge, and it was magnified last month when Russia and Saudi Arabia began their feud. Russian oil executives said they were tired of losing market share to American producers. Saudi Arabia retaliated by promising to pour more oil on the market, taking prices to roughly $20 a barrel for a time, less than half the level at the beginning of the year.

But a complete free fall of oil prices into the single digits — something not seen in two decades — appears to have been avoided. President Trump’s recent public lobbying of Russia and Saudi Arabia to lower production helped raise prices several dollars a barrel, allowing many American companies to limit their losses.

Energy experts acknowledged Mr. Trump’s role in the deal.

“President Trump, who spent the last three years criticizing OPEC, became the de facto president of the producer group,” said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDQvMTIvYnVzaW5lc3MvZW5lcmd5LWVudmlyb25tZW50L29wZWMtcnVzc2lhLXNhdWRpLWFyYWJpYS1vaWwtY29yb25hdmlydXMuaHRtbNIBcGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDQvMTIvYnVzaW5lc3MvZW5lcmd5LWVudmlyb25tZW50L29wZWMtcnVzc2lhLXNhdWRpLWFyYWJpYS1vaWwtY29yb25hdmlydXMuYW1wLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-04-13 00:33:55Z
52780723431648

OPEC, Russia approve biggest ever oil cut amid coronavirus pandemic - Reuters

BAKU/DUBAI/LONDON (Reuters) - OPEC, Russia and other oil producing nations were meeting on Sunday in a bid to clinch a deal on the biggest oil cut ever, amounting to 10 percent of global supply, after their initial efforts to support oil prices amid the coronavirus pandemic were blocked by Mexico.

File Photo: The logo of the Organization of the Petroleoum Exporting Countries (OPEC) is seen outside of OPEC's headquarters in Vienna, Austria April 9, 2020. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger

The group, known as OPEC+, started a video conference at 1715 GMT.

On Thursday, OPEC+ outlined plans to cut output by more than a fifth, or by 10 million barrels per day (bpd), but Mexico balked at the production cuts it was asked to make, delaying the signing of a final deal.

“The ministerial meeting between OPEC and non-OPEC members is a follow-up after the April 9 meeting,” the energy ministry of OPEC+ member Azerbaijan said on Sunday.

Measures to curb the spread of the coronavirus have destroyed demand for fuel and driven down oil prices, straining budgets of oil producers and hammering the U.S. shale industry, which is more vulnerable to low prices due to its higher costs.

OPEC+ also said it wanted producers outside the group, such as the United States, Canada, Brazil and Norway, to cut a further 5% or 5 million bpd.

Canada and Norway signalled willingness to cut and the United States, where legislation makes it hard to act in tandem with cartels such as OPEC, has said its output would fall steeply by itself this year due to low prices.

Mexico President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador said on Friday that U.S. President Donald Trump had offered to make extra U.S. cuts on his behalf, an unusual offer by a Trump who has long railed against OPEC.

((For an analysis on the reasons behind Mexico’s stand-off with OPEC+ click on))

Trump, who had threatened Saudi Arabia with oil tariffs if it did not fix the market’s oversupply problem, said Washington would help Mexico by picking up “some of the slack” and being reimbursed later.

He did not say how this would work and OPEC leader Saudi Arabia has so far refused to accept the fix, according to OPEC sources.

Global oil demand is estimated to have fallen by a third as more than 3 billion people are locked down in their homes due to the coronavirus outbreak.

A 15% cut in supply might not be enough to arrest the price decline, banks Goldman Sachs and UBS predicted last week, saying Brent prices would fall back to $20 per barrel from $32 at the moment and $70 at the start of the year.

Reporting by Reuters OPEC Team, Nailia Bagirova in BAKU, Katya Golubkova in MOSCOW and Tamara Vaal in NUR-SULTAN; Writing by Andrey Ostroukh and Dmitry Zhdannikov; Editing by Jason Neely, Alison Williams and Alex Richardson

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiggFodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL3VzLWdsb2JhbC1vaWwtb3BlYy1hemVyYmFpamFuL29wZWMtcnVzc2lhLW1lZXQtYWdhaW4tdG8tYXBwcm92ZS1iaWdnZXN0LWV2ZXItb2lsLWN1dC1pZFVTS0NOMjFVMEo20gE0aHR0cHM6Ly9tb2JpbGUucmV1dGVycy5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS9hbXAvaWRVU0tDTjIxVTBKNg?oc=5

2020-04-13 00:05:11Z
52780723431648

Oil-Producing Countries Reach Final Deal to Cut Output - The New York Times

HOUSTON — Oil-producing nations on Sunday agreed to the largest production cut ever negotiated, in an unprecedented coordinated effort by Russia, Saudi Arabia and the United States to stabilize oil prices and, indirectly, global financial markets.

Saudi Arabia and Russia typically take the lead in setting global production goals. But President Trump, facing a re-election campaign, a plunging economy and American oil companies struggling with collapsing prices, took the unusual step of getting involved after the two countries entered a price war a month ago. Mr. Trump had made an agreement a key priority.

It was unclear, however, whether the cuts would be enough to bolster prices. Before the coronavirus crisis, 100 million barrels of oil each day fueled global commerce, but demand is down about 35 percent. While significant, the cuts agreed to on Sunday still fall far short of what is needed to bring oil production in line with demand.

The plan by OPEC, Russia and other allied producers in a group known as OPEC Plus will slash 9.7 million barrels a day in May and June, or close to 10 percent of the world’s output.

While the planned cut is slightly smaller than a tentative pact reached last Thursday, the deal should bring some relief to struggling economies in the Middle East and Africa and global oil companies, including American firms that directly and indirectly employ 10 million workers. Analysts expect oil prices, which soared above $100 a barrel only six years ago, to remain below $40 for the foreseeable future. The American oil benchmark price was just under $23 a barrel on Thursday.

“This is at least a temporary relief for the energy industry and for the global economy,” said Per Magnus Nysveen, head of analysis for Rystad Energy, a Norwegian consultancy. “The industry is too big to be let to fail.”

The agreement reached on Sunday was the result of more than a week of telephone conversations involving Mr. Trump; the Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman; and President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.

Negotiations hit a snag when Mexico refused to go along with an agreement fashioned by Russia and Saudi Arabia, saying it would cut just 100,000 barrels a day and not 400,000. Saudi Arabia strongly resisted Mexico’s position, worrying that if Mexico could balk others would follow.

Mr. Trump supported President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, giving vague promises he would make up the difference, and helped coax the Saudis and Russians not to abandon the tentative agreement.

It was not immediately clear if the Trump administration made a formal commitment to cut production in the United States. There is no international mechanism to strictly enforce such production agreements and cheating is common. With prices plummeting, many companies have already reduced output, perhaps to levels approaching those under discussion.

Big oil nations that are not members of OPEC Plus, like Canada, Brazil and Norway, along with the United States, have been cutting production. The Energy Department has said that American oil production will fall by at least two million barrels a day by the end of the year. Other analysts say the eventual cut could be three million barrels a day out of the 13.3 million barrels a day produced at the beginning of the year. President Trump has expressed interest in buying oil to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to further reduce supplies.

The oil crisis began a month ago when Russia refused to go along with cuts promoted by Saudi Arabia and other OPEC producers. In response, Saudi Arabia said it would increase production by three million barrels a day and flood the market. Oil prices and global stock markets fell sharply on the news.

The Russian and Saudi reversal in the last few days was an acknowledgment that their gamble was causing self-inflicted economic wounds.

“There were miscalculations on both sides,” said Ben Cahill, a senior energy fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “The Russians miscalculated how sharp the Saudi response would be and they might have been taken aback by how deep the price drop was.”

The change in course should give a lifeline to American companies, which can now more gradually cut output on their own terms, without government or regulatory mandates, as they invest far less in exploration and production.

“Hopefully, the American oil industry has avoided a worst-case scenario,” said Amy Myers Jaffe, an energy and Middle East expert at the Council on Foreign Relations. “There still will be bankruptcies, but for the time being, the fears that there would be a wholesale destruction of the industry can now be put aside, because the worst of the price war has passed.”

It is possible oil prices will sink again in the coming days if traders are not satisfied with the new cuts. In fact, on Thursday, the last day that oil futures traded, the price fell sharply even though a deal was close.

“The agreement provides the expectation of stability,” Rene Ortiz, Ecuador’s energy minister and a former secretary general of OPEC, said in an interview on Sunday. “But whether the markets react accordingly is a different ballgame.”

With the pandemic crushing economies around the world, few buyers were available in recent weeks to buy the cheap Saudi crude. The kingdom stored some oil in Egypt and was forced to let unsold crude sit in tankers along its coasts.

The mounting glut became a threat to Saudi government finances. At a projected average price of $34 a barrel this year, Rystad Energy estimated the kingdom’s revenues would drop by 50 percent compared with 2019, a loss of $105 billion.

Saudi Arabia still has foreign reserves of $500 billion, but that has shrunk from $740 billion in 2013. Several years of depressed oil prices had already forced the kingdom to borrow money and reduce energy subsidies for citizens. Prince Mohammed is now counting on his reserves to help diversify the Saudi economy for the future.

Russia is in far better shape financially than Saudi Arabia, especially with a flexible exchange rate — as the ruble depreciates, the value of its exports rises. While it would also lose billions of dollars in revenues with the drop in oil prices, the government has a much lower fiscal deficit than Saudi Arabia and has $550 billion in foreign reserves.

But Russia has other liabilities. It has limited processing capacity and its refineries have insufficient storage facilities. European demand has collapsed, and while China is still buying oil, at bargain prices, its storage will be filled up in another month or so, leaving Russian crude stranded.

With thousands of Soviet-era oil and gas wells in western Siberia, Russia would have faced the prospect of shutting down and later turning back on wells that are costly to manage, and in the process might permanently limit the amount of oil recoverable in the future.

Uncertainties abound for the industry as the pandemic disrupts global economies.

Members of OPEC and their allies entered talks last week hoping that the United States, Canada and other Western producers would agree to explicit cuts, adding up to four million or five million barrels a day. Instead, American officials just made assurances that crude output would be reduced over time, on top of voluntary reductions that have already begun at some U.S. companies. The agreement announced on Sunday will tapers into a 7.7-million-barrel-a-day cut from July to December and then to 5.8 million barrels a day from January 2021 to April 2022.

American oil companies are already eliminating thousands of jobs, plugging old wells and decommissioning rigs and fracking equipment in preparation for the worst downturn in more than a generation. While American consumers are saving at the gas pump, oil-producing states like Texas, Oklahoma and North Dakota are expecting deep losses in jobs and tax revenue.

Industry executives predict a wave of consolidation, in which small, indebted companies are either bought by larger ones or merge.

“There will be some companies that won’t survive,” said Trent Latshaw, president of Latshaw Drilling, an oil service company active in Texas and Oklahoma. “But the industry in general will survive and come out of this stronger. We will have to make hard decisions, innovate and we’ll become smarter because of this.”

The American industry was last shaken up in 2014, when Saudi Arabia and its OPEC allies flooded the market with oil in an effort to undercut American shale producers who were grabbing market share from them. Prices crashed and hundreds of American companies went out of business, and 170,000 jobs were lost. While American production briefly dropped, it quickly recovered and grew.

The coronavirus is a new and bigger challenge, and it was magnified last month when Russia and Saudi Arabia began their feud. Russian oil executives said they were tired of losing market share to American producers. Saudi Arabia retaliated by promising to pour more oil on the market, taking prices to roughly $20 a barrel for a time, less than half the level at the beginning of the year.

But a complete free fall of oil prices into the single digits — something not seen in two decades — appears to have been avoided. President Trump’s recent public lobbying of Russia and Saudi Arabia to lower production helped raise prices several dollars a barrel, allowing many American companies to limit their losses.

Energy experts acknowledged Mr. Trump’s role in the deal.

“President Trump, who spent the last three years criticizing OPEC, became the de-facto president of the producer group,” said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDQvMTIvYnVzaW5lc3MvZW5lcmd5LWVudmlyb25tZW50L29wZWMtcnVzc2lhLXNhdWRpLWFyYWJpYS1vaWwtY29yb25hdmlydXMuaHRtbNIBcGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm55dGltZXMuY29tLzIwMjAvMDQvMTIvYnVzaW5lc3MvZW5lcmd5LWVudmlyb25tZW50L29wZWMtcnVzc2lhLXNhdWRpLWFyYWJpYS1vaWwtY29yb25hdmlydXMuYW1wLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-04-12 23:06:48Z
52780723431648

Boris Johnson Released From London Hospital : Coronavirus Live Updates - dineshr

In this handout photo issued by 10 Downing Street, Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks from 10 Downing Street praising NHS staff in a video message, after he was discharged from the hospital a week after being admitted with persistent coronavirus symptoms.

Pippa Fowles/AP


hide caption

toggle caption

Pippa Fowles/AP

In this handout photo issued by 10 Downing Street, Britain’s Prime Minister Boris Johnson speaks from 10 Downing Street praising NHS staff in a video message, after he was discharged from the hospital a week after being admitted with persistent coronavirus symptoms.

Pippa Fowles/AP

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson left the hospital on Sunday, one week after he was admitted with COVID-19, and in a video message, thanked England’s National Health Service for saving his life.

Johnson, who spent multiple nights in an intensive care unit, credited health staff for keeping him alive when, he said, “it could have gone either way.”

“I have today left hospital after a week in which the NHS has saved my life, no question,” said Johnson, who went on to list the names of some of the doctors and nurses who looked after him at St. Thomas’ Hospital in London, which sits across the River Thames from Big Ben.

Johnson, 55, was a key campaigner in favor of Brexit in the 2016 referendum, a campaign that argued, in part, for leaving the European Union to cut and control immigration. But in his address Sunday, Johnson singled out two nurses who watched over him during a crucial 48-hour period — one from New Zealand, the other from Portugal, an EU country. The reference seemed a nod to the important role that foreign staff play in the NHS.

Johnson is recuperating at Chequers, the prime minister’s country estate.

Johnson’s release from the hospital comes as the United Kingdom’s death toll from COVID-19 has passed 10,600, according to tracking by Johns Hopkins University. One of the government’s senior scientific advisers, Sir Jeremy Farrar, said the U.K. is likely to be “one of the worst, if not the worst affected country in Europe.”

While Johnson praised NHS staff on Sunday, some health care workers say the government has failed to provide enough personal protective equipment (PPE). Health Secretary Matt Hancock triggered a backlash on Friday when he said staff should only use the equipment they clinically need and treat PPE as a “precious resource.”

“Correct me if I’m wrong,” responded Alan Courtney, a critical care doctor in England. “I thought that the health care professionals were the precious resource.”

Courtney said some workers are still not being supplied gear appropriate to the risks they are taking as they care for COVID-19 patients.

“It’s easy to describe in very military type terms that we’re the front line, that we’re at war with this enemy,” Courtney said. “You would still not send a soldier into a war zone without a gun. You know, you’d still give him a helmet.”

At least 28 U.K. health care workers have died from COVID-19, according to the BBC.

Source link

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiOWh0dHBzOi8vZGluZXNocmV3YWxlLmNvbS9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1saXZlLXVwZGF0ZXMtbnByLTE3L9IBPWh0dHBzOi8vZGluZXNocmV3YWxlLmNvbS9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1saXZlLXVwZGF0ZXMtbnByLTE3L2FtcC8?oc=5

2020-04-12 23:40:20Z
52780718853831

Pope Francis says it might be 'time to consider a universal basic wage' in Easter letter - Business Insider - Business Insider

  • In an Easter letter to leaders of prominent social movements, Pope Francis suggested that it might be time for countries to consider a universal basic wage.
  • "This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out," The Pope wrote in his letter.
  • Over a dozen countries are implementing or experimenting with some form of temporary or permanent universal basic income in response to the current economic devastation and massive unemployment.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Pope Francis suggested that it might be time for countries to consider a universal basic wage to help ameliorate the worldwide economic disruption to workers caused by the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak in an Easter letter to leaders of prominent social movements. 

The Pope, who is known for his focus and powerful advocacy on behalf of the world's poorest and most marginalized people, devoted significant portions of both his Easter address at the Vatican and his letter to social movement leaders to highlighting the plight of the working class in this crisis.

"This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out," The Pope wrote in his letter. "It would ensure and concretely achieve the ideal, at once so human and so Christian, of no worker without rights."

In his letter, Pope Francis also noted that some of the lowest-wage workers "have been excluded from the benefits of globalization" and often slip through the cracks of existing labor protections, writing that "street vendors, recyclers, carnies, small farmers, construction workers, dressmakers, the different kinds of caregivers...you have no steady income to get you through this hard time...and the lockdowns are becoming unbearable."

Over a dozen countries are implementing or experimenting with some form of temporary or permanent universal basic income in response to the economic devastation and massive unemployment in many places caused by the outbreak of COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus. 

Spain, for example, is moving towards permanently establishing a universal basic income program specifically targeted to its poorest citizens and families in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak. 

The United States, which has more of a limited social safety net than other developed countries, is giving $1,200 emergency stimulus checks to Americans this week. Former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who ran on a platform of universal basic income, says he advised the White House on devising the plan. 

Yang rose up from being a little-known presidential candidate to a national sensation, partly because of his unique policy platform, which included a universal-basic-income program he called the Freedom Dividend. The initiative would give every American adult $1,000 a month, with no strings attached.

Yang's campaign said a non-means-tested UBI program would help solve economic inequality by giving workers a financial safety net, bolster innovation, and pay people for household domestic work, like childcare, which is disproportionately performed by women and isn't compensated in the formal economy.

Pope Francis echoed that point in his Easter letter, writing, "I think of all the people, especially women, who multiply loaves of bread in soup kitchens: two onions and a package of rice make up a delicious stew for hundreds of children. I think of the sick, I think of the elderly. They never appear in the news."

A key distinction, however, between those plans and Yang's signature Freedom Dividend proposal is that while most lawmakers are proposing a one-time or temporary emergency cash infusion to help workers weather the coronavirus crisis, Yang would have made UBI a permanent fixture of the US policy landscape.

Still, the move towards directly giving people cash in response to the ongoing crisis represents a shift in public policy away from the prevailing stereotypes that low-income people are irresponsible with money, Joe Huston, the CFO of the non-profit organization GiveDirectly, which gives people direct cash assistance, told Insider in March. 

"So much of our conditioning is to start with the assumption that you can't just give people money. Like we even have that aphorism around 'you should teach a man to fish, not give them a fish.' I feel like we've all kind of been conditioned to say like, well, that's not possible," Huston said. 

Huston added that "for the people in need, their needs are very diverse," telling Insider, "the advantage of cash is that we can do one thing: get cash to a lot of people and then enable a lot of priorities or fill a lot of gaps for different people."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJ1c2luZXNzaW5zaWRlci5jb20vcG9wZS1mcmFuY2lzLWl0LW1pZ2h0LWJlLXRpbWUtdG8tY29uc2lkZXItdW5pdmVyc2FsLWJhc2ljLXdhZ2UtMjAyMC000gFpaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnVzaW5lc3NpbnNpZGVyLmNvbS9wb3BlLWZyYW5jaXMtaXQtbWlnaHQtYmUtdGltZS10by1jb25zaWRlci11bml2ZXJzYWwtYmFzaWMtd2FnZS0yMDIwLTQ_YW1w?oc=5

2020-04-12 21:41:00Z
52780722410814

Pope Francis says it might be 'time to consider a universal basic wage' in Easter letter - Business Insider - Business Insider

  • In an Easter letter to leaders of prominent social movements, Pope Francis suggested that it might be time for countries to consider a universal basic wage.
  • "This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out," The Pope wrote in his letter.
  • Over a dozen countries are implementing or experimenting with some form of temporary or permanent universal basic income in response to the current economic devastation and massive unemployment.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Pope Francis suggested that it might be time for countries to consider a universal basic wage to help ameliorate the worldwide economic disruption to workers caused by the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak in an Easter letter to leaders of prominent social movements. 

The Pope, who is known for his focus and powerful advocacy on behalf of the world's poorest and most marginalized people, devoted significant portions of both his Easter address at the Vatican and his letter to social movement leaders to highlighting the plight of the working class in this crisis.

"This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out," The Pope wrote in his letter. "It would ensure and concretely achieve the ideal, at once so human and so Christian, of no worker without rights."

In his letter, Pope Francis also noted that some of the lowest-wage workers "have been excluded from the benefits of globalization" and often slip through the cracks of existing labor protections, writing that "street vendors, recyclers, carnies, small farmers, construction workers, dressmakers, the different kinds of caregivers...you have no steady income to get you through this hard time...and the lockdowns are becoming unbearable."

Over a dozen countries are implementing or experimenting with some form of temporary or permanent universal basic income in response to the economic devastation and massive unemployment in many places caused by the outbreak of COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus. 

Spain, for example, is moving towards permanently establishing a universal basic income program specifically targeted to its poorest citizens and families in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak. 

The United States, which has more of a limited social safety net than other developed countries, is giving $1,200 emergency stimulus checks to Americans this week. Former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who ran on a platform of universal basic income, says he advised the White House on devising the plan. 

Yang rose up from being a little-known presidential candidate to a national sensation, partly because of his unique policy platform, which included a universal-basic-income program he called the Freedom Dividend. The initiative would give every American adult $1,000 a month, with no strings attached.

Yang's campaign said a non-means-tested UBI program would help solve economic inequality by giving workers a financial safety net, bolster innovation, and pay people for household domestic work, like childcare, which is disproportionately performed by women and isn't compensated in the formal economy.

Pope Francis echoed that point in his Easter letter, writing, "I think of all the people, especially women, who multiply loaves of bread in soup kitchens: two onions and a package of rice make up a delicious stew for hundreds of children. I think of the sick, I think of the elderly. They never appear in the news."

A key distinction, however, between those plans and Yang's signature Freedom Dividend proposal is that while most lawmakers are proposing a one-time or temporary emergency cash infusion to help workers weather the coronavirus crisis, Yang would have made UBI a permanent fixture of the US policy landscape.

Still, the move towards directly giving people cash in response to the ongoing crisis represents a shift in public policy away from the prevailing stereotypes that low-income people are irresponsible with money, Joe Huston, the CFO of the non-profit organization GiveDirectly, which gives people direct cash assistance, told Insider in March. 

"So much of our conditioning is to start with the assumption that you can't just give people money. Like we even have that aphorism around 'you should teach a man to fish, not give them a fish.' I feel like we've all kind of been conditioned to say like, well, that's not possible," Huston said. 

Huston added that "for the people in need, their needs are very diverse," telling Insider, "the advantage of cash is that we can do one thing: get cash to a lot of people and then enable a lot of priorities or fill a lot of gaps for different people."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJ1c2luZXNzaW5zaWRlci5jb20vcG9wZS1mcmFuY2lzLWl0LW1pZ2h0LWJlLXRpbWUtdG8tY29uc2lkZXItdW5pdmVyc2FsLWJhc2ljLXdhZ2UtMjAyMC000gFpaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnVzaW5lc3NpbnNpZGVyLmNvbS9wb3BlLWZyYW5jaXMtaXQtbWlnaHQtYmUtdGltZS10by1jb25zaWRlci11bml2ZXJzYWwtYmFzaWMtd2FnZS0yMDIwLTQ_YW1w?oc=5

2020-04-12 21:27:03Z
52780722410814

Pope Francis says it might be 'time to consider a universal basic wage' in Easter letter - Business Insider - Business Insider

  • In an Easter letter to leaders of prominent social movements, Pope Francis suggested that it might be time for countries to consider a universal basic wage.
  • "This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out," The Pope wrote in his letter.
  • Over a dozen countries are implementing or experimenting with some form of temporary or permanent universal basic income in response to the current economic devastation and massive unemployment.
  • Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.

Pope Francis suggested that it might be time for countries to consider a universal basic wage to help ameliorate the worldwide economic disruption to workers caused by the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak in an Easter letter to leaders of prominent social movements. 

The Pope, who is known for his focus and powerful advocacy on behalf of the world's poorest and most marginalized people, devoted significant portions of both his Easter address at the Vatican and his letter to social movement leaders to highlighting the plight of the working class in this crisis.

"This may be the time to consider a universal basic wage which would acknowledge and dignify the noble, essential tasks you carry out," The Pope wrote in his letter. "It would ensure and concretely achieve the ideal, at once so human and so Christian, of no worker without rights."

In his letter, Pope Francis also noted that some of the lowest-wage workers "have been excluded from the benefits of globalization" and often slip through the cracks of existing labor protections, writing that "street vendors, recyclers, carnies, small farmers, construction workers, dressmakers, the different kinds of caregivers...you have no steady income to get you through this hard time...and the lockdowns are becoming unbearable."

Over a dozen countries are implementing or experimenting with some form of temporary or permanent universal basic income in response to the economic devastation and massive unemployment in many places caused by the outbreak of COVID-19, the disease caused by the novel coronavirus. 

Spain, for example, is moving towards permanently establishing a universal basic income program specifically targeted to its poorest citizens and families in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak. 

The United States, which has more of a limited social safety net than other developed countries, is giving $1,200 emergency stimulus checks to Americans this week. Former presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who ran on a platform of universal basic income, says he advised the White House on devising the plan. 

Yang rose up from being a little-known presidential candidate to a national sensation, partly because of his unique policy platform, which included a universal-basic-income program he called the Freedom Dividend. The initiative would give every American adult $1,000 a month, with no strings attached.

Yang's campaign said a non-means-tested UBI program would help solve economic inequality by giving workers a financial safety net, bolster innovation, and pay people for household domestic work, like childcare, which is disproportionately performed by women and isn't compensated in the formal economy.

Pope Francis echoed that point in his Easter letter, writing, "I think of all the people, especially women, who multiply loaves of bread in soup kitchens: two onions and a package of rice make up a delicious stew for hundreds of children. I think of the sick, I think of the elderly. They never appear in the news."

A key distinction, however, between those plans and Yang's signature Freedom Dividend proposal is that while most lawmakers are proposing a one-time or temporary emergency cash infusion to help workers weather the coronavirus crisis, Yang would have made UBI a permanent fixture of the US policy landscape.

Still, the move towards directly giving people cash in response to the ongoing crisis represents a shift in public policy away from the prevailing stereotypes that low-income people are irresponsible with money, Joe Huston, the CFO of the non-profit organization GiveDirectly, which gives people direct cash assistance, told Insider in March. 

"So much of our conditioning is to start with the assumption that you can't just give people money. Like we even have that aphorism around 'you should teach a man to fish, not give them a fish.' I feel like we've all kind of been conditioned to say like, well, that's not possible," Huston said. 

Huston added that "for the people in need, their needs are very diverse," telling Insider, "the advantage of cash is that we can do one thing: get cash to a lot of people and then enable a lot of priorities or fill a lot of gaps for different people."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJ1c2luZXNzaW5zaWRlci5jb20vcG9wZS1mcmFuY2lzLWl0LW1pZ2h0LWJlLXRpbWUtdG8tY29uc2lkZXItdW5pdmVyc2FsLWJhc2ljLXdhZ2UtMjAyMC000gFpaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnVzaW5lc3NpbnNpZGVyLmNvbS9wb3BlLWZyYW5jaXMtaXQtbWlnaHQtYmUtdGltZS10by1jb25zaWRlci11bml2ZXJzYWwtYmFzaWMtd2FnZS0yMDIwLTQ_YW1w?oc=5

2020-04-12 21:16:55Z
52780722410814