Jumat, 17 April 2020

US intel HAS begun a full-scale investigation into Wuhan lab and its role in the virus - Daily Mail

US intelligence has ALREADY started a full-scale investigation into Wuhan lab and it's 'role in the virus' as the White House weighs up what punishment will be dished out to Beijing over 'cover up'

  • American spy agencies probe whether Wuhan Virology Lab was source of virus
  • US suspects lab worker became 'Patient Zero' in lab accident, reports say
  • China quickly blamed the Wuhan 'wet market', which did not sell bats
  • Country is refuting allegations the pandemic could have originated in laboratory 
  • WHO parroted the Chinese government's claim about the market's likely role
  • Secretary of State Mike Pompeo warned Beijing to 'come clean' 
  • US diplomatic cables in 2018 warned of risky bat research at Wuhan lab
  • Army general admits that 'we can't be certain' about where virus emerged  
  • If true, the disaster could go down as biggest government coverup of all time
  • Learn more about how to help people impacted by COVID

American intelligence services have reportedly launched a full-scale investigation into a lab in Wuhan, China, over claims that scientists there allowed the novel coronavirus to escape as part of a botched experiment, leading to a global pandemic.

China has denied speculation that the pathogen originated inside the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab, though US government agencies are now said to be piecing together a timeline of what authorities in Beijing knew so as to ‘create an accurate picture of what happened.’

Sources told Fox News on Friday that American analysts will present their findings ‘in the near term’ to President Trump, who will then huddle with aides in order to determine how to hold China accountable for the pandemic.

The American intelligence sources told Fox News that analysts in Washington have ruled out the theory that the coronavirus was engineered by Chinese scientists as a bioweapon.

The United States government has reportedly launched a full-scale investigation into whether the coronavirus originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab in Wuhan, China

The United States government has reportedly launched a full-scale investigation into whether the coronavirus originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology lab in Wuhan, China

Spy agencies are expected to hand their conclusions over to President Trump (above) who will then decide on how to 'hold China accountable,' according to reports

Spy agencies are expected to hand their conclusions over to President Trump (above) who will then decide on how to 'hold China accountable,' according to reports

Experts note that the genome mapping of the virus indicates that there were no genetic alterations made to it.

US sources told Fox News they believe that ‘patient zero’ became infected with coronavirus as it was being studied inside the lab.

The infected person then is believed to have spread the virus throughout the city and onwards.

The broad scientific consensus holds that SARS-CoV-2, the official name of the coronavirus, originated in bats. 

The Wuhan lab is China's only bio-safety level four (BSL-4) facility, and has long been eyed with suspicion as scientists try to determine how the deadly virus crossed over into humans.

However, suspicion of the lab was quickly dismissed as a 'conspiracy theory' by some who insisted, like the Chinese leadership, that a wild animal market must have been the source. 

Although the earliest confirmed case in Wuhan was a person who had no connection to the Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market, Chinese officials quickly pinned the blame on the market, a talking point that was eagerly repeated by the World Health Organization.

'A large proportion of the initial cases in late December 2019 and early January 2020 had a direct link to the Huanan Wholesale Seafood Market in Wuhan City, where seafood, wild, and farmed animal species were sold,' the WHO website says about the possible origins of the pandemic, while acknowledging the exact source of the outbreak has not been determined. 

Defense Secretary Mark Esper said on Thursday he doesn't believe the Chinese government has been transparent about the coronavirus

Defense Secretary Mark Esper said on Thursday he doesn't believe the Chinese government has been transparent about the coronavirus

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News on Wednesday that Chinese officials need to 'open up' about how the coronavirus originated in their country

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Fox News on Wednesday that Chinese officials need to 'open up' about how the coronavirus originated in their country

'Many of the initial patients were either stall owners, market employees, or regular visitors to this market. Environmental samples taken from this market in December 2019 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, further suggesting that the market in Wuhan City was the source of this outbreak or played a role in the initial amplification of the outbreak,' the WHO says. 

Though scientists say that genetic evidence indicates the virus was not artificially engineered, likely originated in bats, and probably crossed over to a human in a single event, there is nothing in the genetic data to indicate exactly where and how the virus first crossed to humans. 

Defense Secretary Mark Esper on Thursday was more cautious when asked by NBC News whether he believes that the coronavirus originated from the lab.

The Pentagon chief told the TODAY show that 'a majority of the views right now is that it is natural, it is organic.'

Nonetheless, Esper said he didn't believe the Chinese government was being forthright about the origins of the coronavirus.

'I find it hard to trust much of what comes out of the Chinese Communist Party,' Esper said. 

'They've been misleading us, they've been opaque, if you will, from the early days of this virus. 

Workers are seen next to a cage with mice (right) at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in a file photo. US officials reportedly believe coronavirus first crossed over to humans inside the lab

Workers are seen next to a cage with mice (right) at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in a file photo. US officials reportedly believe coronavirus first crossed over to humans inside the lab

'So I don't have much faith that they're even been truthful with us now.'

Esper added: 'We can't have one of the largest nations in the world hiding information or not being transparent when it comes to helping us deal with this.' 

On Wednesday, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo demanded that China 'come clean' about what it knows.

Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. is trying to determine whether the coronavirus first crossed to humans accidentally during experiments with bats at the Wuhan Institute of Virology Lab. 

After word of the outbreak finally became public, Chinese leaders were quick to blame Wuhan's 'wet market' where wild animals -- though not bats -- are sold for consumption, leading one source to tell Fox News the debacle is the 'costliest government coverup of all time.' 

'Patient zero' worked at the Wuhan lab, and spread the virus into the local population after leaving work, sources who had been briefed on intelligence told the outlet.

China has refuted claims that the virus may have originated in a laboratory near the city of Wuhan where contagious samples were being stored.  

'What we do know is we know that this virus originated in Wuhan, China,' Pompeo told Fox News on Wednesday evening. 'We know there is the Wuhan Institute of Virology just a handful of miles away from where the wet market was. There is still lots to learn. The United States government is working diligently to figure it out.' 

Asked about the new allegations at a White House press conference on Wednesday, Trump replied cryptically: 'More and more, we're hearing the story.'

'We are doing a very thorough examination of this horrible situation that happened,' Trump said.

Asked if he had raised the subject in his conversations with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Trump said: 'I don't want to discuss what I talked to him about the laboratory, I just don't want to discuss, it's inappropriate right now.'

Pompeo said in the interview that 'one of the best ways they [China] could find to cooperate would be to let the world in and to let the world's scientists know exactly how this came to be; exactly how this virus began to spread.'

'[There were] a lot of cases [and] a lot of movement; a lot of travel around the world before the Chinese Communist Party came clean about what really transpired there,' the secretary of state continued. 'These are the kinds of things that open governments [and] democracies don't do. It's why there's such risk associated with the absence of transparency. We need it still today.' 

US diplomats warned of inadequate safety at the Wuhan lab (seen in a file photo), including risky experiments being done to identify coronaviruses in bats

US diplomats warned of inadequate safety at the Wuhan lab (seen in a file photo), including risky experiments being done to identify coronaviruses in bats

A colorized scanning electron micrograph of an apoptotic cell (red) heavily infected with SARS-COV-2 virus particles (yellow), isolated from a patient sample

A colorized scanning electron micrograph of an apoptotic cell (red) heavily infected with SARS-COV-2 virus particles (yellow), isolated from a patient sample

In early 2018, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing sent two official warnings back to Washington about inadequate safety at the Wuhan lab, including that it was conducting risky studies on pathogens in the coronavirus family in bats, the Washington Post reported Wednesday.

The cables warned about safety and management weaknesses at the lab and proposed more international assistance.

The Wuhan lab was originally set up with assistance from the French and American governments, but in recent years the Chinese have rebuffed international assistance there and tried to prove their ability to work independently.

After the coronavirus outbreak began, officials at the lab destroyed samples of the virus, erased early reports, and suppressed academic papers, sources told Fox News. 

China is refuting allegations that the coronavirus pandemic may have originated in a laboratory near the city of Wuhan where contagious samples were being stored. 

Officials at the Wuhan lab have previously dismissed any allegation that the virus emerged from the facility, calling them baseless conspiracy theories. 

Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian cited the head of the World Health Organization and other unidentified medical experts as saying there was no evidence that transmission began from the lab and there was 'no scientific basis' for such claims.

'We always believe that this is a scientific issue and requires the professional assessment of scientists and medical experts,' Zhao told reporters at a daily briefing on Thursday.

'Only with reasonable response can the international community win this fight,' Zhao said. 'China will continue to work together with other countries to help and support each other.'

China has also strongly denied claims it delayed reporting on the virus outbreak in Wuhan late last year and underreported case numbers, worsening the impact on the U.S. and other countries.

On Wednesday, it emerged that top Chinese officials waited six days to warn the public after becoming aware that a viral outbreak was causing a rash of deadly pneumonia cases in Wuhan. 

In the meantime, residents in Wuhan hosted a mass banquet for tens of thousands of people, and millions began traveling for Lunar New Year celebrations. 

A worker is seen ninside the P4 laboratory in Wuhan. Chinese leaders waited six days after becoming aware of the outbreak in Wuhan to warn the public

A worker is seen ninside the P4 laboratory in Wuhan. Chinese leaders waited six days after becoming aware of the outbreak in Wuhan to warn the public

Chinese President President Xi Jinping waited six days to warn the public after learning of the deadly outbreak in Wuhan that has gone on to kill 130,000 around the world

Chinese President President Xi Jinping waited six days to warn the public after learning of the deadly outbreak in Wuhan that has gone on to kill 130,000 around the world

President Xi Jinping warned the public on the seventh day after top Communist Party leaders learned of the outbreak, January 20. 

In the meantime, the Chinese government arrested or silenced doctors and citizens in Wuhan who tried to speak out about the disturbing new outbreak. 

Even the mayor of Wuhan suggested in an interview with Chinese state television that Communist Party leadership prohibited him from warning the public until January 20.

By the time Xi issued the public warning, more than 3,000 people had been infected during almost a week of public silence, according to internal documents and expert estimates based on retrospective infection data.

The delay from January 14 to January 20 by the first country to face the new coronavirus came at a critical time - the beginning of the outbreak. 

China's delay set the stage for a pandemic that has infected more than 2 million people and taken more than 133,000 lives worldwide.

'This is tremendous,' said Zuo-Feng Zhang, an epidemiologist at the University of California, Los Angeles. 'If they took action six days earlier, there would have been much fewer patients and medical facilities would have been sufficient. We might have avoided the collapse of Wuhan´s medical system.' 

Experts say that China´s rigid controls on information, bureaucratic hurdles and a reluctance to send bad news up the chain of command muffled early warnings. 

The punishment of eight doctors for 'rumor-mongering,' broadcast on national television on January 2, sent a chill through the city´s hospitals.

'Doctors in Wuhan were afraid,' said Dali Yang, a professor of Chinese politics at the University of Chicago. 'It was truly intimidation of an entire profession.'

Without these internal reports, it took the first case outside China, in Thailand on January 13, to galvanize leaders in Beijing into recognizing the possible pandemic before them. 

It was only then that they launched a nationwide plan to find cases - distributing test kits, easing the criteria for confirming cases and ordering health officials to screen patients. 

They also instructed officials in Hubei province, where Wuhan is located, to begin temperature checks at transportation hubs and cut down on large public gatherings. And they did it all without telling the public.

The Chinese government has repeatedly denied suppressing information in the early days, saying it immediately reported the outbreak to the World Health Organization.

'Those accusing China of lacking transparency and openness are unfair,' foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian said Wednesday

US general admits 'we can't be certain' whether coronavirus originated at 'poorly run' lab in Wuhan

An Army general has said that the Wuhan lab cannot be ruled out as the source of the outbreak. 

'There's a lot of rumor and speculation in a wide variety of media, the blog sites, etc,' Army General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said when asked if there was any evidence the coronavirus may have been developed in a Chinese laboratory.

'It should be no surprise to you that we've taken a keen interest in that and we've had a lot of intelligence take a hard look at that,' he said.

U.S. Joint Chiefs Chairman Army Gen. Mark Milley addresses a news conference as Defense Secretary Mark Esper listens at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia on Thursday

U.S. Joint Chiefs Chairman Army Gen. Mark Milley addresses a news conference as Defense Secretary Mark Esper listens at the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia on Thursday

'And I would just say, at this point, it's inconclusive although the weight of evidence seems to indicate natural. But we can't be certain.'

Other top experts have insisted that the truth needs to be pursued, wherever it leads.

'I don't think it's a conspiracy theory. I think it's a legitimate question that needs to be investigated and answered,' Xiao Qiang, a research scientist at the School of Information at the University of California at Berkeley told the Post. 

'To understand exactly how this originated is critical knowledge for preventing this from happening in the future.' 

China has not been forthcoming about many aspects of the early outbreak, and Trump recently said the country may not be revealing the whole truth about their rate of COVID-19 infections and deaths.

Trump and other officials have expressed deep skepticism of China's officially declared death toll from the virus of around 3,000 people, when the United States has a death toll of more than 20,000 and rising.

He returned to the subject on Wednesday, saying the United States has more cases 'because we do more reporting.'

'Do you really believe those numbers in this vast country called China, and that they have a certain number of cases and a certain number of deaths; does anybody really believe that?' he said. 

State Department warned in 2018 that Wuhan lab testing bats for coronavirus had sloppy safety precautions and had the potential to cause a 'new SARS-like pandemic' 

The US State Department raised concerns over safety issues at the Wuhan research lab studying coronaviruses in animals like bats two years ago, new diplomatic cables reveal.

In 2018 diplomats said there were issues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), located near the seafood market Chinese authorities claim the virus emerged from, cables obtained by the Washington Post reveal.

A US delegation led by Jamison Fouss, consul general in Wuhan, and Rick Switzer, the Beijing embassy's counselor of environment, science, technology and health, visited the Wuhan level four biosafety lab multiple times from January to March 2018.

They voiced concern over a lack of safety protocols and the biosafety of the lab's research on coronavirus in animals like bats and warned that if cautionary steps weren't taken, the lab's research could spark a SARS-like outbreak.

They sent two 'sensitive but unclassified cables' back to Washington, DC asking for assistance to help the lab heighten its security measures. 

The institute is located only 20 miles from the food market where it was originally believed that the outbreak began. Experts continue to say the virus was transmitted from animal to human and was not lab engineered in China as some conspiracy theories have claimed

The institute is located only 20 miles from the food market where it was originally believed that the outbreak began. Experts continue to say the virus was transmitted from animal to human and was not lab engineered in China as some conspiracy theories have claimed 

They warned that a lack of tight safety measures in handing the contagious viruses in the lab 'represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic.'

'During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory,' a cable dated January 19, 2018 said.

'The cable was a warning shot. They were begging people to pay attention to what was going on,' one US official said.

The cables argued that the United States should give the Wuhan lab further support to help control the situation, but after those messages no extra assistance was provided to those labs.

The US was not only flagged to the activities going on in that laboratory, but they were also prior financially and scientifically involved in their studies.

In 2018 a US delegation visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology (above) several times and sent two cables to Washington DC asking for help to beef its safety and security measures, warning that the lab 'represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic'

In 2018 a US delegation visited the Wuhan Institute of Virology (above) several times and sent two cables to Washington DC asking for help to beef its safety and security measures, warning that the lab 'represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic'

The WIV received assistance from the Galveston National Laboratory at the University of Texas Medical Branch and other U.S. organizations in its work.

The US National Institute of Health, a government agency, also gave a $3.7million research grant to the WIV to carry out research on bats from caves in Yunnan, more than 1,000 miles away. Scientists have traced the sequencing of the COVID-19 genome to Yunnan, the Mail on Sunday revealed over the weekend. It's not clear when that grant was given.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology had previously published research locating the cluster of bats believed to have transmitted SARS to humans in the 2002 outbreak that infected 8,000.

The lab was also the first to report in February that COVID-19 was derived from bats.

 While the exact source of COVID-19 remains a mystery, scientists and officials say it was transmitted from animals to humans and likely originated in a bat.

 

 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODIzMTgwMS9VUy1pbnRlbC1iZWd1bi1zY2FsZS1pbnZlc3RpZ2F0aW9uLVd1aGFuLWxhYi1yb2xlLXZpcnVzLmh0bWzSAXFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgyMzE4MDEvYW1wL1VTLWludGVsLWJlZ3VuLXNjYWxlLWludmVzdGlnYXRpb24tV3VoYW4tbGFiLXJvbGUtdmlydXMuaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-04-18 03:01:59Z
52780728884116

China's deadly legacy exposed: Major new series sorts coronavirus conspiracy theories from facts - Daily Mail

China's deadly legacy exposed: Major new series sorts coronavirus conspiracy theories from chilling facts

When tens of thousands worldwide are dead or dying and many thousands more are doomed, it’s an odd thing to boast about.

But when the flagship Hermès store in the Chinese city of Guangzhou reopened after a two-month coronavirus lockdown last weekend, it took a staggering $2.7 million — the highest one day earnings by a single boutique in China, ever.

VIPs from Guangdong, China’s wealthiest province, flocked there with their wives to partake in what has been termed ‘revenge shopping’: revenge against the deadly Covid-19 disease which prevented them from spending lavishly for so long.

A few days later and 600 miles away, Wuhan’s biggest ‘wet’ market — similar to the city’s Huanan seafood market which also sold live wild animals for human consumption and has been blamed for being the origin of the pandemic — re-opened too.

Researchers work in a lab of Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, 23 February 2017

Researchers work in a lab of Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, 23 February 2017

The message was the same and broadcast by state television for global consumption. After a sharp contraction in its economy China is open for business. World-leading business.

Meanwhile, the West, mostly still in lockdown, heads for economic ruin. We find ourselves in a desperately weakened state, just like a Covid-19 victim on a ventilator.

But have the Chinese authorities really brought their outbreak under control?

Should we believe their official death toll, which is relatively modest even after Wuhan revised its figures 50 per cent upwards yesterday?

And did the pandemic truly begin in that Huanan seafood market, rather than by accident or even design in the city’s state-run Institute of Virology, as some — including Donald Trump this week — have implied?

Residents wearing face masks purchase seafood at a wet market on January 28, 2020 in Macau, China

Residents wearing face masks purchase seafood at a wet market on January 28, 2020 in Macau, China

Responding to the suggestion that weak safety protocols at the Institute meant it was an infected lab worker who’d gone to the seafood market that began the pandemic, the U.S. President said: ‘More and more we’re hearing the story.’

What is clear is that the Chinese Communist Party has practised — is still practising — one of the more grotesque deceptions by a totalitarian government.

By seeking to ‘control the narrative’ the authorities first created a fatal paralysis, then an information vacuum into which has been sucked all kinds of speculation.

In an attempt to piece together — as accurately as possible — the extraordinary story of the pandemic’s emergence, the Mail has spoken this week to leading virologists, academics who specialise in China, economists and activists.

Today in the first of a three part series on the Coronavirus Crisis we can also reveal — via the world famous Pasteur Institute in Paris — the frightening new research, as yet officially unpublished, which suggests the new coronavirus could pass not only to domestic cats but to farm livestock, too; thus creating new reservoirs for the pathogen in the UK.

We can tell the story of previous deadly pathogen escapes from Chinese laboratories — and cover ups. We will examine the Chinese state’s inexplicable actions in the early days of the outbreak and the competing claims of conspiracy theories which emerged as a result. And we will look at where China and the world goes from here.

Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Chuanshan port area of the Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, Zhejiang Province, China - 29 Mar 2020

Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Chuanshan port area of the Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, Zhejiang Province, China - 29 Mar 2020

Should we be surprised by what has happened?

No, says Ma Jian, the author and human rights activist who is known as ‘the Chinese Solzhenitsyn’, after the famous Soviet era dissident.

Mr Jian, who was jailed in China and now lives in exile in London, spoke to the Mail last night about the West’s long and lucrative cultivation of China. He said: ‘It has been a disastrous experiment. Democracies cannot engage with totalitarian regimes blindly in this way, without suffering catastrophic consequences. The result is in the UK alone there have been more than 14,000 deaths. That is one truth which cannot be avoided.’

In 1977 a strange strain of flu started infecting people in Northern China. The symptoms — mostly not fatal — duplicated those of a flu type last seen two decades before and thought extinct.

The strain rapidly spread around the world. But it afflicted only people under 20. How could this be?

Genetic tests by virologists indicated this was indeed the same ‘extinct’ flu from the late 1950s. In its prime, the strain had been so widespread that anyone alive was likely to have been exposed to it and developed immunity.

Where had it been for two decades? And why the comeback?

The virus had another quirk. It would only survive in a ‘middling’ temperature range — as though it had been bred to do this.

In fact it had been scientifically selected to flourish in lab temperatures. Gene testing further showed it hadn’t mutated over 20 years in the way it would certainly have done if it had been replicating for generations in the wild.

All the evidence suggested the virus had been frozen and stored in a lab for years. Then it had been thawed, and somehow escaped to prey on a new generation that had no natural immunity, according to a report by the University of California, San Diego, in the journal PLoS One in 2010.

Fingers immediately pointed to Chinese virology labs as the source. Investigators suggested the virus may have escaped from a lab where researchers were working on a new vaccine in response to warnings about an expected pandemic of a form of swine flu.

VIPs from Guangdong, China’s wealthiest province, flocked there with their wives to partake in what has been termed ‘revenge shopping’. Pictured: Mall in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China, April 16

VIPs from Guangdong, China’s wealthiest province, flocked there with their wives to partake in what has been termed ‘revenge shopping’. Pictured: Mall in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China, April 16

These facts are not well-known, because virology experts worldwide rarely spoke about it for years.Indeed, the leak had happened in the depths of the Cold War. Western scientists did not want to risk humiliating Communist China, for fear it would stop cooperating with global efforts to detect other dangerous virus outbreaks.

But this obscure story has chilling echoes today for experts who fear the current pandemic — SARS-CoV-2 is the scientific name of the new coronavirus which causes Covid-19 in humans — emerged not from Wuhan’s Huanan market, but escaped from one of the city’s two laboratories experimenting with bat coronaviruses.

The SARS catastrophe

One of these laboratories — run by the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention — is very close to the Huanan market.

Certainly China has form with virus escapes from laboratories. Worse still, it has already experienced catastrophic accidents with SARS (Severe Acute respiratory Syndrome) viruses which first emerged in China in 2002. In April 2004, China reported a suspected case of SARS in a 20-year-old nurse in Beijing who’d cared for a female lab researcher. That researcher took a train home to be looked after by her mother, a doctor — who died from SARS pneumonia within a fortnight.

The lab researcher had worked at the Chinese National Institute of Virology in Beijing. So too had a young man who fell ill that month. Neither had worked with live SARS virus. Seven other people were infected before a mass quarantine stopped the outbreak.

World Health Organisation (WHO) investigators later reported ‘serious concerns’ regarding the lab’s security. Five senior officials at the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention were sacked. But the WHO wanted more, and called for future Chinese work on SARS-related viruses to be conducted using high level virus-containment measures called Biosafety Level 3 (BSL 3).

However, it is reported that the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention lab in Wuhan has also been conducting research into animal coronaviruses — with only a Level 2 certificate of biosafety.

When the flagship Hermès store in the Chinese city of Guangzhou reopened after a two-month coronavirus lockdown last weekend, it took a staggering $2.7 million

When the flagship Hermès store in the Chinese city of Guangzhou reopened after a two-month coronavirus lockdown last weekend, it took a staggering $2.7 million

The Wuhan Institute of Virology has the highest biosafety certification level — 4 — but has been accused of poor work protocols and being a source of the new virus by multiple sources.

Only last December, Chinese health authorities were promising in the national China Daily to boost their labs’ biosafety — this time in the wake of an incident where the cattle-borne disease brucellosis had infected several lab technicians in Gansu province.

Fortunately, the infection could not spread from human to human.

Since the Covid-19 outbreak however, such official candidness has been replaced by censorship.

Mystery disease and cover-ups

In late December — before the outbreak was publicised — doctors at Wuhan Central Hospital who posted a message alerting colleagues to the mystery new disease were accused by security forces of ‘making false comments’ and forced to sign statements agreeing not to discuss the disease.

Earlier this month, Chinese authorities began to crack down on publication of academic research about the origins of the novel coronavirus.

Pasteur report bombshell: Cattle, sheep and even cats can catch it 

The novel strain of coronavirus responsible for the current pandemic may have evolved to infect domestic cats and many species of farm animal — potentially creating a vast haven from which it may repeatedly invade humans, new research has found. 

A scientific report, submitted to a journal run by the world-renowned Pasteur Institute, in Paris, has been seen by the Mail prior to publication. 

Researchers at the University of Hunan have studied the lung structures of 251 different animals to determine which could be infected with Covid-19 through contact with either bats or humans. 

Their findings suggest that, beyond infecting bats, pangolins and humans, the virus has evolved the ability to infect at least ten other creatures. 

The danger list includes cats, cows, goats, pigs, sheep, buffalo and pigeons. 

This raises the possibility that, having jumped from humans into these mammals, the virus might mutate into new, even more lethal forms that could then emerge to infect people again. 

The study team is led by Xing-Yi Ge, a virologist who previously worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases. 

The virologists’ report is due to be published in the journal Microbes And Infection. 

It warns that ‘interspecies transmission is believed to be a major cause of coronavirus epidemic’. 

The report adds that this happened in the 2003 Sars epidemic, when the virus moved from bats into humans via infected civet cats and raccoons. 

To create their species risk-list, the scientists studied the structure of a protein receptor on animal cells called ACE2 — the same receptor through which Covid-19 enters human cells and takes over the cell’s machinery to make copies of itself that infect other cells. 

The new research indicates that dogs, unlike cats, should not be susceptible to Covid-19 because they do not have the same vulnerable entry point in cells. 

Covid-19 originated in horseshoe bats, but the new study says bats are unlikely to have passed it to humans through direct contact because that is so rare. 

There are two main theories to explain how Covid-19 entered humans: that it was passed on via an intermediary animal, such as a pangolin sold at Wuhan’s food market, or that a sample of the horseshoe bat virus escaped from one of two laboratories in Wuhan that were studying the creatures. 

The ability of Covid-19 to infect animals that share space with people may create a real, long-lasting threat. 

One of Europe’s foremost virology experts, Simon Wain-Hobson, of the Pasteur Institute, says the new Chinese study may have alarming implications. 

He told the Mail: ‘If they had recently isolated a novel coronavirus from a mammal in the list, then I’d gulp.’ The study’s author, Xing-Yi Ge, told the Mail the research is in its preliminary stages, adding: ‘No living virus has yet been isolated from any of the animals on our list. However, some early studies have reported animals such as cats with positive blood tests for coronavirus.’ 

Indeed, one such victim has been a tiger at the Bronx Zoo in New York. 

The peril of pandemics caused by viruses that have jumped from animals to humans looks set to grow, according to a report this month led by Bernard Bett, a senior scientist in Kenya. 

He warns the danger is increasing due to population growth and increased urbanisation, with human settlement expanding into areas once occupied only by wild animals. 

Increased proximity fuels the transfer of viruses. 

‘Already three quarters of emerging human infectious disease outbreaks originate from animals,’ he warns. 

Recent examples include HIV and Ebola, which both emerged in Africa. 

Climate change is another factor, according to respiratory disease researchers at the University of Miami. 

Variations in rainfall and temperature may cause food scarcities for animals such as bats, chimps, pangolins and deer, which can all carry dangerous infections. 

A search for food is liable to bring such creatures into closer contact with humans, they say in the journal Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 

Furthermore, if crops fail and livestock die due to increased flooding, droughts, heatwaves or pests, we may start hunting more animals for food. 

One Ebola outbreak in 1996, for example, is believed to have been the result of villagers eating a chimpanzee. 

Two leading Chinese universities published web notices requiring academic papers dealing with Covid-19 to be scrutinised first by the Ministry of Science and Technology.

Research on the origins of the virus is particularly sensitive and subject to checks by government officials, according to the notices posted by Fudan University and the China University of Geosciences (Wuhan).

Jane Duckett, a professor at Glasgow University’s Scottish Centre for China Research, told the Mail: ‘It is a typical response by the Chinese authorities to try to control the narrative on any story they might think threatens them.’ Professor Duckett, who focuses on Chinese policy and health, adds: ‘With coronavirus, this may be for example because they know that their initial response to the outbreak was not good enough and would cause dissatisfaction among the Chinese people.

‘We have seen the same before with the 2008 earthquake in Sichuan province where some 80,000 people died.

‘The authorities did not want people protesting at how planning corruption had allowed buildings to be constructed that collapsed during the quake.’

In similar fashion, the authorities muzzled media coverage of a high-speed train crash in 2011 that killed at least 38 people and injured 192. Footage emerged of bulldozers shovelling dirt over carriages in an apparent attempt to hide them.

Scandals over train crashes and earthquakes take big lies to cover up. Now we must consider an almost unthinkable question: is the Chinese government also lying about how the world’s biggest pandemic began? It’s little wonder then that conspiracy theories have come to the fore, which brings us to a leading scientist known as ‘Bat Woman’.

The rise and rise of ‘Bat Woman’

It had seemed that 2017 was an annus mirabilis for Dr Shi Zengli and her team at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

After 13 years of research they had found the genetic source of the SARS coronavirus which killed 750 people worldwide between 2002-2004.

Among the samples taken in 2013 in the caves of Yunnan province, one was labelled RaTG13. It came from a variety of horseshoe bat.

Bats have an extraordinary resistance to disease and can act as living reservoirs to viruses which cannot kill them — but which may be lethal to other mammals, including humans.

Scientists had suspected that civet cats — sold for human consumption in Chinese wet markets — were the source of the SARS virus. But the civets proved only to be an intermediary for the fatal transfer to humans from bats.

Similarly, the MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) coronavirus outbreak of 2012 which killed 850 people, transferred from bats via camels to humans.

In 1994, the Hendra coronavirus infection also jumped species from horses to humans. Malaysia’s 1998 Nipah virus outbreak — from pigs to humans — also originated in pathogens from bats.

The brilliant Ms Zengli had other research interests and was experimenting in synthetic viruses which could pass from animals to humans.

Recent research has suggested the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (which causes Covid-19) can pass directly from bats to humans which posed the question: had she gone too far in playing God, deliberately or otherwise?

Enter the CIA and MI6. This week, following the leak of 2018 American diplomatic cables expressing concerns about the allegedly reckless way the Wuhan Institute of Virology was being run, the intelligence services became involved in solving the mystery of Covid-19’s emergence.

Their intervention is a potential game changer in understanding why we are in lockdown; why so many of our grandparents’ generation is dying; why our economy is tanking.

To date, the Chinese Communist Party’s leadership has been unwilling to provide the explanatory narrative. And so the conspiracy theories and educated guesses have proliferated.

So who was Patient Zero?

In late January, after Wuhan’s belated lockdown, Twitter banned libertarian website Zero Hedge for ‘doxing’ — publishing private information with malicious intent.

The site had tweeted in a piece headlined ‘Is This The Man Behind The Global Coronavirus Pandemic?’ a picture of a scientist at Wuhan’s Institute of Virology.

There followed a flurry of similar accusations on Chinese social media that the cause of the outbreak was the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its poor practices.

On February 7 Ms Zengli said the claims were the work of ‘conspiracy theorists who don’t believe in science’. By that time rumours were abroad that one of her recruits — in late 2019 there were at least two online advertisements for bat virus-related research jobs — had become ‘Patient Zero’: the first person to die of Covid-19.

The speculation about an individual called Huang Yanling was enough to cause the Institute to issue a denial on Febuary 16.

‘Recently there has been fake information about Huang Yanling, a graduate from our institute, claiming that she was patient zero in the novel coronavirus,’ it said. ‘Huang was a graduate student at the institute until 2015.’

So there. But where is she now?

A plot by anti Beijing activists?

Last month an internet documentary drew together and interpreted many of the accusatory threads. It was made by a media group linked with groups opposed to the Chinese leadership and called Tracking Down The Origin Of The Wuhan Coronavirus.

Certainly it made diligent use of the available material.

On January 24 one of the first studies of Covid-19 cases appeared in highly respected British medical journal, The Lancet. The co-authors were medics from hospitals in Wuhan and elsewhere in China. The paper took as its evidence samples from 41 Covid-19 victims in Wuhan who had contracted the virus by January 2.

The film seized upon the claim that the study’s Patient Zero — the first man to suffer symptoms, which he did as early as December 1 — had no known direct interaction with the Huanan seafood market. Nor did 13 others of the 41.

It was also claimed no bats were sold at the market. The Huanan link was ‘highly unlikely, if not impossible’ the film suggested. The Chinese had been imposing a false criteria by concentrating on the market. The authorities had closed and cleansed the market, destroying potential evidence. It was a clear ‘cover up’.

But of what? The results of a second scientific paper were also highlighted by the film. This report was published in Nature, another globally respected journal, in early February.

It drew attention to the genetic similarity found between the new — then as yet unnamed — Wuhan coronavirus and two coronaviruses previously found in bats in Zhoushan. The only Westerner among the report’s 19 co-authors was British-born Professor Eddie Holmes of Sydney University.

‘These data suggest that bats are a possible host for the viral reservoir of (the Wuhan virus),’ said the Nature report. ‘However, as a variety of animal species were for sale in the market when the disease was first reported, further studies are needed to determine the natural reservoir and any intermediate hosts.’

The documentary stated that the two bat samples had been found by ‘the People’s Liberation Army’ (in fact a scientific institute linked to the military).

The plot thickened.

According to one ex U.S. Department of Defense scientist in the film — the Mail has discovered he also happened to be Executive Director of an organisation called the Global Alliance against Communist Propaganda — all the indications were that the new coronavirus was the result of ‘reverse engineering’ of the SARS virus.

Another expert argued ‘it could not possibly be a natural mutation’.

The new coronavirus was not naturally occurring at all, they argued. It had been artificially ‘manipulated’ in a laboratory so that it could enter and destroy human cells.

And the person allegedly at the centre of this sinister manipulation was the Institute of Virology’s famed ‘bat woman’, Shi Zengli.

British born Professor Simon Wain-Hobson of the Pasteur Institute in Paris was cited in the film as being ‘deeply concerned’ by her work. And why shouldn’t he be, the lay viewer might ask? There was a sequence in the new virus’s genetic make-up which, the film said, mimicked HIV, the virus which causes AIDS.

Was the Wuhan virus being developed in the Institute of Virology to create a ‘bio-weapon?’ Or a virus for which the Chinese had the only, highly lucrative, cure?

A second paper in Nature, submitted this February by Zengli and her team, was offered up by the film as further proof of malfeasance.

This new report revealed a faecal sample — RaTG13 — taken by Zengli’s team in the bat cave in 2013 demonstrated ‘an overall genome sequence identity of 96.2%’ to the new coronavirus. It was its closest relative and formed ‘a distinct lineage from other SARS-like viruses’.

Dr Zengli appeared to be waving a smoking gun.

She emphatically denies the cause of the virus was her laboratory work. She has admitted to Scientific American magazine that after reports of an outbreak she had been worried of an accidental escape of her material.

Then she had checked her lab samples against those taken from Covid-19 victims and been reassured they were not to blame.

What of other scientists mentioned in the film?

Earlier this week Prof Wain-Hobson told the Mail the film ‘suffers from a large number of problems, starting with things called facts. As far as we virologists can see this virus is natural,’ he said. ‘That means with the data we have that is available in the public domain. And that’s it.’

Of the possibility of a lab escape Professor Wain-Hobson said: ‘It is very possible that the Chinese haven’t told World Health Organisation (WHO) and the West everything. And yes, they don’t like the U.S. and Trump. They want to be Number One on a small planet.

‘But an engineered virus? There is nothing about this virus that indicates it’s out of a lab. I say that with the info available and my appreciation of virus evolution.’

In a Twitter post Prof Holmes concurred: ‘I think there are a number of really clear reasons to believe that this is not in any way a lab construct or a lab escape.’

Will CIA and MI6 crack Covid-19?

That position is backed by senior U.S. scientists.

But then came a report this week in The Washington Post story based on those leaked diplomatic cables from 2018. The leak coincided, conveniently you may think, with President Trump’s announcement that he was withdrawing financial support from the WHO which he felt was too cosy with Beijing.

After the story broke Prof Wain-Hobson told the Mail: ‘Without knowing what was going on in the lab we cannot say more. As mentioned earlier, it doesn’t look an engineered and others feel this way too, which is comforting. But this is because we’re using the same data.’

Professor Holmes agreed with this view in a social media statement released on Thursday. ‘There is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 in humans, originated in a laboratory in Wuhan, China,’ he said.

‘Coronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2 are commonly found in wildlife species and frequently jump to new hosts. This is also the most likely explanation for the origin of SARS-CoV-2.’

For its part China has even attempted to blame America. In October 2019 a team of U.S. athletes travelled to Wuhan for the World Military Games.

‘It might be U.S. Army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! U.S. owe us an explanation!’ a Chinese Foreign Minister said last month

Who can say definitively yet — if ever — whether infected bats were sold in the Huanan seafood market? Or other animals, such as pangolins, which might have served as carriers of the virus?

Credible voices in the Western scientific community maintain the evidence suggests the pandemic is a natural occurrence. But thanks to the inaction and secrecy of the Chinese authorities, Western intelligence services have now been tasked with determining the truth.

 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMijwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgyMzE0NjcvQ2hpbmFzLWRlYWRseS1sZWdhY3ktZXhwb3NlZC1NYWpvci1uZXctc2VyaWVzLXNvcnRzLWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWNvbnNwaXJhY3ktdGhlb3JpZXMtZmFjdHMuaHRtbNIBkwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgyMzE0NjcvYW1wL0NoaW5hcy1kZWFkbHktbGVnYWN5LWV4cG9zZWQtTWFqb3ItbmV3LXNlcmllcy1zb3J0cy1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1jb25zcGlyYWN5LXRoZW9yaWVzLWZhY3RzLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-04-18 01:26:46Z
52780728884116

China's deadly legacy exposed: Major new series sorts coronavirus conspiracy theories from facts - Daily Mail

China's deadly legacy exposed: Major new series sorts coronavirus conspiracy theories from chilling facts

When tens of thousands worldwide are dead or dying and many thousands more are doomed, it’s an odd thing to boast about.

But when the flagship Hermès store in the Chinese city of Guangzhou reopened after a two-month coronavirus lockdown last weekend, it took a staggering $2.7 million — the highest one day earnings by a single boutique in China, ever.

VIPs from Guangdong, China’s wealthiest province, flocked there with their wives to partake in what has been termed ‘revenge shopping’: revenge against the deadly Covid-19 disease which prevented them from spending lavishly for so long.

A few days later and 600 miles away, Wuhan’s biggest ‘wet’ market — similar to the city’s Huanan seafood market which also sold live wild animals for human consumption and has been blamed for being the origin of the pandemic — re-opened too.

Researchers work in a lab of Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, 23 February 2017

Researchers work in a lab of Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in Wuhan, Hubei province, China, 23 February 2017

The message was the same and broadcast by state television for global consumption. After a sharp contraction in its economy China is open for business. World-leading business.

Meanwhile, the West, mostly still in lockdown, heads for economic ruin. We find ourselves in a desperately weakened state, just like a Covid-19 victim on a ventilator.

But have the Chinese authorities really brought their outbreak under control?

Should we believe their official death toll, which is relatively modest even after Wuhan revised its figures 50 per cent upwards yesterday?

And did the pandemic truly begin in that Huanan seafood market, rather than by accident or even design in the city’s state-run Institute of Virology, as some — including Donald Trump this week — have implied?

Residents wearing face masks purchase seafood at a wet market on January 28, 2020 in Macau, China

Residents wearing face masks purchase seafood at a wet market on January 28, 2020 in Macau, China

Responding to the suggestion that weak safety protocols at the Institute meant it was an infected lab worker who’d gone to the seafood market that began the pandemic, the U.S. President said: ‘More and more we’re hearing the story.’

What is clear is that the Chinese Communist Party has practised — is still practising — one of the more grotesque deceptions by a totalitarian government.

By seeking to ‘control the narrative’ the authorities first created a fatal paralysis, then an information vacuum into which has been sucked all kinds of speculation.

In an attempt to piece together — as accurately as possible — the extraordinary story of the pandemic’s emergence, the Mail has spoken this week to leading virologists, academics who specialise in China, economists and activists.

Today in the first of a three part series on the Coronavirus Crisis we can also reveal — via the world famous Pasteur Institute in Paris — the frightening new research, as yet officially unpublished, which suggests the new coronavirus could pass not only to domestic cats but to farm livestock, too; thus creating new reservoirs for the pathogen in the UK.

We can tell the story of previous deadly pathogen escapes from Chinese laboratories — and cover ups. We will examine the Chinese state’s inexplicable actions in the early days of the outbreak and the competing claims of conspiracy theories which emerged as a result. And we will look at where China and the world goes from here.

Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Chuanshan port area of the Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, Zhejiang Province, China - 29 Mar 2020

Chinese President Xi Jinping visits Chuanshan port area of the Ningbo-Zhoushan Port, Zhejiang Province, China - 29 Mar 2020

Should we be surprised by what has happened?

No, says Ma Jian, the author and human rights activist who is known as ‘the Chinese Solzhenitsyn’, after the famous Soviet era dissident.

Mr Jian, who was jailed in China and now lives in exile in London, spoke to the Mail last night about the West’s long and lucrative cultivation of China. He said: ‘It has been a disastrous experiment. Democracies cannot engage with totalitarian regimes blindly in this way, without suffering catastrophic consequences. The result is in the UK alone there have been more than 14,000 deaths. That is one truth which cannot be avoided.’

In 1977 a strange strain of flu started infecting people in Northern China. The symptoms — mostly not fatal — duplicated those of a flu type last seen two decades before and thought extinct.

The strain rapidly spread around the world. But it afflicted only people under 20. How could this be?

Genetic tests by virologists indicated this was indeed the same ‘extinct’ flu from the late 1950s. In its prime, the strain had been so widespread that anyone alive was likely to have been exposed to it and developed immunity.

Where had it been for two decades? And why the comeback?

The virus had another quirk. It would only survive in a ‘middling’ temperature range — as though it had been bred to do this.

In fact it had been scientifically selected to flourish in lab temperatures. Gene testing further showed it hadn’t mutated over 20 years in the way it would certainly have done if it had been replicating for generations in the wild.

All the evidence suggested the virus had been frozen and stored in a lab for years. Then it had been thawed, and somehow escaped to prey on a new generation that had no natural immunity, according to a report by the University of California, San Diego, in the journal PLoS One in 2010.

Fingers immediately pointed to Chinese virology labs as the source. Investigators suggested the virus may have escaped from a lab where researchers were working on a new vaccine in response to warnings about an expected pandemic of a form of swine flu.

VIPs from Guangdong, China’s wealthiest province, flocked there with their wives to partake in what has been termed ‘revenge shopping’. Pictured: Mall in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China, April 16

VIPs from Guangdong, China’s wealthiest province, flocked there with their wives to partake in what has been termed ‘revenge shopping’. Pictured: Mall in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, China, April 16

These facts are not well-known, because virology experts worldwide rarely spoke about it for years.Indeed, the leak had happened in the depths of the Cold War. Western scientists did not want to risk humiliating Communist China, for fear it would stop cooperating with global efforts to detect other dangerous virus outbreaks.

But this obscure story has chilling echoes today for experts who fear the current pandemic — SARS-CoV-2 is the scientific name of the new coronavirus which causes Covid-19 in humans — emerged not from Wuhan’s Huanan market, but escaped from one of the city’s two laboratories experimenting with bat coronaviruses.

The SARS catastrophe

One of these laboratories — run by the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention — is very close to the Huanan market.

Certainly China has form with virus escapes from laboratories. Worse still, it has already experienced catastrophic accidents with SARS (Severe Acute respiratory Syndrome) viruses which first emerged in China in 2002. In April 2004, China reported a suspected case of SARS in a 20-year-old nurse in Beijing who’d cared for a female lab researcher. That researcher took a train home to be looked after by her mother, a doctor — who died from SARS pneumonia within a fortnight.

The lab researcher had worked at the Chinese National Institute of Virology in Beijing. So too had a young man who fell ill that month. Neither had worked with live SARS virus. Seven other people were infected before a mass quarantine stopped the outbreak.

World Health Organisation (WHO) investigators later reported ‘serious concerns’ regarding the lab’s security. Five senior officials at the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention were sacked. But the WHO wanted more, and called for future Chinese work on SARS-related viruses to be conducted using high level virus-containment measures called Biosafety Level 3 (BSL 3).

However, it is reported that the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention lab in Wuhan has also been conducting research into animal coronaviruses — with only a Level 2 certificate of biosafety.

When the flagship Hermès store in the Chinese city of Guangzhou reopened after a two-month coronavirus lockdown last weekend, it took a staggering $2.7 million

When the flagship Hermès store in the Chinese city of Guangzhou reopened after a two-month coronavirus lockdown last weekend, it took a staggering $2.7 million

The Wuhan Institute of Virology has the highest biosafety certification level — 4 — but has been accused of poor work protocols and being a source of the new virus by multiple sources.

Only last December, Chinese health authorities were promising in the national China Daily to boost their labs’ biosafety — this time in the wake of an incident where the cattle-borne disease brucellosis had infected several lab technicians in Gansu province.

Fortunately, the infection could not spread from human to human.

Since the Covid-19 outbreak however, such official candidness has been replaced by censorship.

Mystery disease and cover-ups

In late December — before the outbreak was publicised — doctors at Wuhan Central Hospital who posted a message alerting colleagues to the mystery new disease were accused by security forces of ‘making false comments’ and forced to sign statements agreeing not to discuss the disease.

Earlier this month, Chinese authorities began to crack down on publication of academic research about the origins of the novel coronavirus.

Pasteur report bombshell: Cattle, sheep and even cats can catch it 

The novel strain of coronavirus responsible for the current pandemic may have evolved to infect domestic cats and many species of farm animal — potentially creating a vast haven from which it may repeatedly invade humans, new research has found. 

A scientific report, submitted to a journal run by the world-renowned Pasteur Institute, in Paris, has been seen by the Mail prior to publication. 

Researchers at the University of Hunan have studied the lung structures of 251 different animals to determine which could be infected with Covid-19 through contact with either bats or humans. 

Their findings suggest that, beyond infecting bats, pangolins and humans, the virus has evolved the ability to infect at least ten other creatures. 

The danger list includes cats, cows, goats, pigs, sheep, buffalo and pigeons. 

This raises the possibility that, having jumped from humans into these mammals, the virus might mutate into new, even more lethal forms that could then emerge to infect people again. 

The study team is led by Xing-Yi Ge, a virologist who previously worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology’s Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases. 

The virologists’ report is due to be published in the journal Microbes And Infection. 

It warns that ‘interspecies transmission is believed to be a major cause of coronavirus epidemic’. 

The report adds that this happened in the 2003 Sars epidemic, when the virus moved from bats into humans via infected civet cats and raccoons. 

To create their species risk-list, the scientists studied the structure of a protein receptor on animal cells called ACE2 — the same receptor through which Covid-19 enters human cells and takes over the cell’s machinery to make copies of itself that infect other cells. 

The new research indicates that dogs, unlike cats, should not be susceptible to Covid-19 because they do not have the same vulnerable entry point in cells. 

Covid-19 originated in horseshoe bats, but the new study says bats are unlikely to have passed it to humans through direct contact because that is so rare. 

There are two main theories to explain how Covid-19 entered humans: that it was passed on via an intermediary animal, such as a pangolin sold at Wuhan’s food market, or that a sample of the horseshoe bat virus escaped from one of two laboratories in Wuhan that were studying the creatures. 

The ability of Covid-19 to infect animals that share space with people may create a real, long-lasting threat. 

One of Europe’s foremost virology experts, Simon Wain-Hobson, of the Pasteur Institute, says the new Chinese study may have alarming implications. 

He told the Mail: ‘If they had recently isolated a novel coronavirus from a mammal in the list, then I’d gulp.’ The study’s author, Xing-Yi Ge, told the Mail the research is in its preliminary stages, adding: ‘No living virus has yet been isolated from any of the animals on our list. However, some early studies have reported animals such as cats with positive blood tests for coronavirus.’ 

Indeed, one such victim has been a tiger at the Bronx Zoo in New York. 

The peril of pandemics caused by viruses that have jumped from animals to humans looks set to grow, according to a report this month led by Bernard Bett, a senior scientist in Kenya. 

He warns the danger is increasing due to population growth and increased urbanisation, with human settlement expanding into areas once occupied only by wild animals. 

Increased proximity fuels the transfer of viruses. 

‘Already three quarters of emerging human infectious disease outbreaks originate from animals,’ he warns. 

Recent examples include HIV and Ebola, which both emerged in Africa. 

Climate change is another factor, according to respiratory disease researchers at the University of Miami. 

Variations in rainfall and temperature may cause food scarcities for animals such as bats, chimps, pangolins and deer, which can all carry dangerous infections. 

A search for food is liable to bring such creatures into closer contact with humans, they say in the journal Annals of the American Thoracic Society. 

Furthermore, if crops fail and livestock die due to increased flooding, droughts, heatwaves or pests, we may start hunting more animals for food. 

One Ebola outbreak in 1996, for example, is believed to have been the result of villagers eating a chimpanzee. 

Two leading Chinese universities published web notices requiring academic papers dealing with Covid-19 to be scrutinised first by the Ministry of Science and Technology.

Research on the origins of the virus is particularly sensitive and subject to checks by government officials, according to the notices posted by Fudan University and the China University of Geosciences (Wuhan).

Jane Duckett, a professor at Glasgow University’s Scottish Centre for China Research, told the Mail: ‘It is a typical response by the Chinese authorities to try to control the narrative on any story they might think threatens them.’ Professor Duckett, who focuses on Chinese policy and health, adds: ‘With coronavirus, this may be for example because they know that their initial response to the outbreak was not good enough and would cause dissatisfaction among the Chinese people.

‘We have seen the same before with the 2008 earthquake in Sichuan province where some 80,000 people died.

‘The authorities did not want people protesting at how planning corruption had allowed buildings to be constructed that collapsed during the quake.’

In similar fashion, the authorities muzzled media coverage of a high-speed train crash in 2011 that killed at least 38 people and injured 192. Footage emerged of bulldozers shovelling dirt over carriages in an apparent attempt to hide them.

Scandals over train crashes and earthquakes take big lies to cover up. Now we must consider an almost unthinkable question: is the Chinese government also lying about how the world’s biggest pandemic began? It’s little wonder then that conspiracy theories have come to the fore, which brings us to a leading scientist known as ‘Bat Woman’.

The rise and rise of ‘Bat Woman’

It had seemed that 2017 was an annus mirabilis for Dr Shi Zengli and her team at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

After 13 years of research they had found the genetic source of the SARS coronavirus which killed 750 people worldwide between 2002-2004.

Among the samples taken in 2013 in the caves of Yunnan province, one was labelled RaTG13. It came from a variety of horseshoe bat.

Bats have an extraordinary resistance to disease and can act as living reservoirs to viruses which cannot kill them — but which may be lethal to other mammals, including humans.

Scientists had suspected that civet cats — sold for human consumption in Chinese wet markets — were the source of the SARS virus. But the civets proved only to be an intermediary for the fatal transfer to humans from bats.

Similarly, the MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome) coronavirus outbreak of 2012 which killed 850 people, transferred from bats via camels to humans.

In 1994, the Hendra coronavirus infection also jumped species from horses to humans. Malaysia’s 1998 Nipah virus outbreak — from pigs to humans — also originated in pathogens from bats.

The brilliant Ms Zengli had other research interests and was experimenting in synthetic viruses which could pass from animals to humans.

Recent research has suggested the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (which causes Covid-19) can pass directly from bats to humans which posed the question: had she gone too far in playing God, deliberately or otherwise?

Enter the CIA and MI6. This week, following the leak of 2018 American diplomatic cables expressing concerns about the allegedly reckless way the Wuhan Institute of Virology was being run, the intelligence services became involved in solving the mystery of Covid-19’s emergence.

Their intervention is a potential game changer in understanding why we are in lockdown; why so many of our grandparents’ generation is dying; why our economy is tanking.

To date, the Chinese Communist Party’s leadership has been unwilling to provide the explanatory narrative. And so the conspiracy theories and educated guesses have proliferated.

So who was Patient Zero?

In late January, after Wuhan’s belated lockdown, Twitter banned libertarian website Zero Hedge for ‘doxing’ — publishing private information with malicious intent.

The site had tweeted in a piece headlined ‘Is This The Man Behind The Global Coronavirus Pandemic?’ a picture of a scientist at Wuhan’s Institute of Virology.

There followed a flurry of similar accusations on Chinese social media that the cause of the outbreak was the Wuhan Institute of Virology and its poor practices.

On February 7 Ms Zengli said the claims were the work of ‘conspiracy theorists who don’t believe in science’. By that time rumours were abroad that one of her recruits — in late 2019 there were at least two online advertisements for bat virus-related research jobs — had become ‘Patient Zero’: the first person to die of Covid-19.

The speculation about an individual called Huang Yanling was enough to cause the Institute to issue a denial on Febuary 16.

‘Recently there has been fake information about Huang Yanling, a graduate from our institute, claiming that she was patient zero in the novel coronavirus,’ it said. ‘Huang was a graduate student at the institute until 2015.’

So there. But where is she now?

A plot by anti Beijing activists?

Last month an internet documentary drew together and interpreted many of the accusatory threads. It was made by a media group linked with groups opposed to the Chinese leadership and called Tracking Down The Origin Of The Wuhan Coronavirus.

Certainly it made diligent use of the available material.

On January 24 one of the first studies of Covid-19 cases appeared in highly respected British medical journal, The Lancet. The co-authors were medics from hospitals in Wuhan and elsewhere in China. The paper took as its evidence samples from 41 Covid-19 victims in Wuhan who had contracted the virus by January 2.

The film seized upon the claim that the study’s Patient Zero — the first man to suffer symptoms, which he did as early as December 1 — had no known direct interaction with the Huanan seafood market. Nor did 13 others of the 41.

It was also claimed no bats were sold at the market. The Huanan link was ‘highly unlikely, if not impossible’ the film suggested. The Chinese had been imposing a false criteria by concentrating on the market. The authorities had closed and cleansed the market, destroying potential evidence. It was a clear ‘cover up’.

But of what? The results of a second scientific paper were also highlighted by the film. This report was published in Nature, another globally respected journal, in early February.

It drew attention to the genetic similarity found between the new — then as yet unnamed — Wuhan coronavirus and two coronaviruses previously found in bats in Zhoushan. The only Westerner among the report’s 19 co-authors was British-born Professor Eddie Holmes of Sydney University.

‘These data suggest that bats are a possible host for the viral reservoir of (the Wuhan virus),’ said the Nature report. ‘However, as a variety of animal species were for sale in the market when the disease was first reported, further studies are needed to determine the natural reservoir and any intermediate hosts.’

The documentary stated that the two bat samples had been found by ‘the People’s Liberation Army’ (in fact a scientific institute linked to the military).

The plot thickened.

According to one ex U.S. Department of Defense scientist in the film — the Mail has discovered he also happened to be Executive Director of an organisation called the Global Alliance against Communist Propaganda — all the indications were that the new coronavirus was the result of ‘reverse engineering’ of the SARS virus.

Another expert argued ‘it could not possibly be a natural mutation’.

The new coronavirus was not naturally occurring at all, they argued. It had been artificially ‘manipulated’ in a laboratory so that it could enter and destroy human cells.

And the person allegedly at the centre of this sinister manipulation was the Institute of Virology’s famed ‘bat woman’, Shi Zengli.

British born Professor Simon Wain-Hobson of the Pasteur Institute in Paris was cited in the film as being ‘deeply concerned’ by her work. And why shouldn’t he be, the lay viewer might ask? There was a sequence in the new virus’s genetic make-up which, the film said, mimicked HIV, the virus which causes AIDS.

Was the Wuhan virus being developed in the Institute of Virology to create a ‘bio-weapon?’ Or a virus for which the Chinese had the only, highly lucrative, cure?

A second paper in Nature, submitted this February by Zengli and her team, was offered up by the film as further proof of malfeasance.

This new report revealed a faecal sample — RaTG13 — taken by Zengli’s team in the bat cave in 2013 demonstrated ‘an overall genome sequence identity of 96.2%’ to the new coronavirus. It was its closest relative and formed ‘a distinct lineage from other SARS-like viruses’.

Dr Zengli appeared to be waving a smoking gun.

She emphatically denies the cause of the virus was her laboratory work. She has admitted to Scientific American magazine that after reports of an outbreak she had been worried of an accidental escape of her material.

Then she had checked her lab samples against those taken from Covid-19 victims and been reassured they were not to blame.

What of other scientists mentioned in the film?

Earlier this week Prof Wain-Hobson told the Mail the film ‘suffers from a large number of problems, starting with things called facts. As far as we virologists can see this virus is natural,’ he said. ‘That means with the data we have that is available in the public domain. And that’s it.’

Of the possibility of a lab escape Professor Wain-Hobson said: ‘It is very possible that the Chinese haven’t told World Health Organisation (WHO) and the West everything. And yes, they don’t like the U.S. and Trump. They want to be Number One on a small planet.

‘But an engineered virus? There is nothing about this virus that indicates it’s out of a lab. I say that with the info available and my appreciation of virus evolution.’

In a Twitter post Prof Holmes concurred: ‘I think there are a number of really clear reasons to believe that this is not in any way a lab construct or a lab escape.’

Will CIA and MI6 crack Covid-19?

That position is backed by senior U.S. scientists.

But then came a report this week in The Washington Post story based on those leaked diplomatic cables from 2018. The leak coincided, conveniently you may think, with President Trump’s announcement that he was withdrawing financial support from the WHO which he felt was too cosy with Beijing.

After the story broke Prof Wain-Hobson told the Mail: ‘Without knowing what was going on in the lab we cannot say more. As mentioned earlier, it doesn’t look an engineered and others feel this way too, which is comforting. But this is because we’re using the same data.’

Professor Holmes agreed with this view in a social media statement released on Thursday. ‘There is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 in humans, originated in a laboratory in Wuhan, China,’ he said.

‘Coronaviruses like SARS-CoV-2 are commonly found in wildlife species and frequently jump to new hosts. This is also the most likely explanation for the origin of SARS-CoV-2.’

For its part China has even attempted to blame America. In October 2019 a team of U.S. athletes travelled to Wuhan for the World Military Games.

‘It might be U.S. Army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan. Be transparent! Make public your data! U.S. owe us an explanation!’ a Chinese Foreign Minister said last month

Who can say definitively yet — if ever — whether infected bats were sold in the Huanan seafood market? Or other animals, such as pangolins, which might have served as carriers of the virus?

Credible voices in the Western scientific community maintain the evidence suggests the pandemic is a natural occurrence. But thanks to the inaction and secrecy of the Chinese authorities, Western intelligence services have now been tasked with determining the truth.

 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMijwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgyMzE0NjcvQ2hpbmFzLWRlYWRseS1sZWdhY3ktZXhwb3NlZC1NYWpvci1uZXctc2VyaWVzLXNvcnRzLWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWNvbnNwaXJhY3ktdGhlb3JpZXMtZmFjdHMuaHRtbNIBkwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgyMzE0NjcvYW1wL0NoaW5hcy1kZWFkbHktbGVnYWN5LWV4cG9zZWQtTWFqb3ItbmV3LXNlcmllcy1zb3J0cy1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1jb25zcGlyYWN5LXRoZW9yaWVzLWZhY3RzLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-04-18 00:41:30Z
52780728884116