Kamis, 06 Mei 2021

Brazil: At least 25 killed in Rio de Janeiro shoot-out - BBC News

Civil Police officers at the Jacarezinho favela
AFP

At least 25 people including a police officer have been killed in a shoot-out in Rio de Janeiro, according to local media.

The shoot-out took place during a police operation in a favela in the Jacarezinho area of the city.

Police launched the operation after receiving reports that drug traffickers were recruiting children for their gang.

Two passengers on a metro train were hit by bullets but survived.

Police in the Brazilian city confirmed the death of one of their officers, Inspector Andre Leonardo de Mello Frias. A statement on Facebook said "he honoured the profession he loved and will be missed".

Police Chief Ronaldo Oliveira told Reuters news agency that Thursday's raid was "the largest number of deaths in a police operation in Rio".

According to local news, the gang targeted in this raid engages in drug trafficking, mugging, murders and kidnappings.

Television images showed suspects trying to escape across rooftops as police entered the favela.

Drugs and weapons are presented to the media following the raid
Reuters

Meanwhile, residents of Jacarezinho have shared accounts of what they witnessed on social media.

One resident posted a photo of his blood-covered floor and said two people had died in his house as police chased the criminals. The man, who did not want to give his name, said he would try to move out of the area as soon as possible.

"We're trying to sell the house as fast as possible, we can't continue to live here," he said.

Other residents said officers had seized their phones, accusing them of warning gang members of the raid.

Location of the clashes in Jacarezinho, Rio

Sociology professor Ignacio Cano from the Laboratory for the Analysis of Violence at Rio State University dismissed the reasons the police gave for the raid: "To say that drug traffickers recruit children and teenagers to deal drugs is almost laughable because everyone knows that these gangs have minors who work for them.

"To say that you're going to launch a massive raid because you've discovered that traffickers recruit children is a joke," he told O Dia newspaper.

A Brazilian soldier searches a man during an operation against drug gangs in Jacarezinho
Reuters

Rio de Janeiro is one of Brazil's most violent states and vast areas are under the control of criminals, many of them linked to powerful drug-trafficking gangs.

Security forces in Brazil have often been accused of excessive use of force against the civilian population during anti-crime operations in major cities.

A court ruling last June restricted police action in poor neighbourhoods of Rio during the pandemic unless it was deemed essential.

Rio de Janeiro is the city with the biggest percentage of people living in shanty towns in Brazil - 22%. It's a population of 1,3 million, 70% of which are black.

2px presentational grey line

Worrying resurgence

Analysis by Camilla Motta, BBC Brasil reporter, Sao Paulo

Police operations targeting favelas controlled by drug traffickers are quite common in Rio. This, however, is the deadliest operation since 2016.

Since a court ruling last June restricted police action in poor neighbourhoods in Rio, the number of deaths in shootouts in favelas has fallen.

In the first month alone, deaths plummeted 70% when compared to the average recorded since 2007, according to the research group Grupo de Estudos dos Novos Ilegalismos, from Universidade Federal Fluminense.

The drop was not followed by a rise in crime. In fact, property crimes were down by 40% and homicides by 48%. Researchers argue this shows that police operations are not the best strategy to tackle crime.

2px presentational grey line

You may also be interested in

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLWxhdGluLWFtZXJpY2EtNTcwMTMyMDbSATtodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY28udWsvbmV3cy93b3JsZC1sYXRpbi1hbWVyaWNhLTU3MDEzMjA2LmFtcA?oc=5

2021-05-06 17:54:55Z
52781573433630

US secretary of state warns on Russia and China - BBC News - BBC News

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9SDN0X2pJZFliYTjSAQA?oc=5

2021-05-06 12:26:58Z
52781561515259

Pharma industry fears Biden’s patent move sets dangerous precedent - Financial Times

Profits in the pharmaceutical industry are protected by a fortress of patents that guarantee drugmakers a stream of income until they expire. On Wednesday, Joe Biden broke with decades of US orthodoxy and made a crack in the wall.

His administration’s decision to support a temporary waiver of Covid-19 vaccine patents prompted instant outrage in the pharmaceutical sector, which argues that the move rides roughshod over their intellectual property rights and will discourage US innovation while sending jobs abroad.

“Intellectual property is the lifeblood of biotech, it’s like oxygen to our industry,” said Brad Loncar, a biotech investor. “If you take it away, you don’t have a biotech sector.”

Biden’s top trade adviser Katherine Tai said that while the US government still “believes strongly” in intellectual property protections, it supported waiving patents for Covid-19 vaccines to help boost global production of jabs.

The move comes as some countries, including India, struggle to tackle further waves of the virus even as others have rolled out successful vaccination campaigns that are driving down infections, hospitalisations and deaths.

The waiver proposal was put forward at the World Trade Organization in October and has since been supported by more than 60 countries who say worldwide vaccine production must increase dramatically. Washington’s support marks a pivotal step in making the proposal a reality and Tai said the US would engage in negotiations to hammer out the details at the WTO.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO’s director-general, told the Financial Times the decision was a “monumental moment” in the fight against Covid-19. “I am not surprised by this announcement. This is what I expected from the administration of President Biden.”

However, the pharma industry did not expect it; the US has tended to fiercely protect domestic companies’ intellectual property rights in trade disputes. Industry leaders described the decision as a heavy blow for innovation that would do little to boost global production because there is a shortage of manufacturing facilities and skilled employees.

In an earnings call Thursday, Stéphane Bancel, chief executive of Moderna, said a patent waiver “will not help supply more mRNA vaccines to the world any faster in 2021 and 2022, which is the most critical time of the pandemic”.

“There is no idle mRNA manufacturing capacity in the world,” he said.

“The administration’s steps here are very unnecessary and damaging,” said Jeremy Levin, chair of biotech trade association Bio. “Securing vaccines rapidly will not be the result, and worse yet, it sets a principle that companies who invested in new tech will stand the risk of having that taken away.”

Shares in the big makers of Covid-19 vaccines were hit by the announcement. Frankfurt-listed shares in BioNTech lost 14 per cent on Thursday while Moderna and Novavax closed down by between 3 per cent and 6 per cent in New York the day before. CanSino Biologics, a Chinese private company that developed a single-shot adenovirus-vectored vaccine with Chinese military researchers, fell 14 per cent on Thursday. Fosun Pharma, which has a deal to supply BioNTech vaccines in China, lost 9 per cent.

Sven Borho, a managing partner at OrbiMed Advisors, a healthcare investment company, said pharma executives feared the administration’s move set a precedent that would make it easier to suspend patents in the future.

“They are worried in the long term that this is a foot in the door — ‘OK, we did it with Covid-19, let’s do it with the next crisis, and the next one’,” he said. “And then suddenly it’s a cancer drug patent that needs to be invalidated. They fear it is a mechanism that sets the stage for actions in the future.”

Peter Bach, director of Memorial Sloan Kettering’s Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, said there was a potential trade-off that pitted the imminent need to contain the pandemic against the risk that drugmakers would be more cautious when investing in pioneering therapies in the future.

“If this action allows for more access and more people to have their lives saved today in 2021 and the consequence is down the road we may not have some new gene therapy for 100 kids, then that’s the trade-off worth discussing,” Bach said.

The battle over intellectual property rights is the first big international patent dispute since a clash over expensive HIV treatments between drugmakers and several countries including Brazil and South Africa in the late 1990s.

Countries struggling to contain the epidemic wanted to make their own generic versions of HIV drugs but the companies who developed them interpreted the moves as a breach of patent agreements, spawning a welter of litigation that frustrated efforts to generate a supply of cheap pills.

Members of the pharmaceutical industry argue that suspending Covid-19 vaccine patents in an effort to boost production abroad will harm jobs in the US biotech sector. Donald Trump’s administration firmly opposed the waiver last year. 

Levin said that US technology “could generate jobs in America but by transferring it abroad there’ll be significant detriment to creating very high quality jobs [here]”.

The mRNA technology used in BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna’s vaccines is being trialled to treat other illnesses such as cancer and heart disease, and pharma lobbyists have claimed suspending their patents would allow other countries to piggyback on US research breakthroughs.

The long-term consequences are unclear. Umer Raffat, an analyst at Evercore ISI, noted the waiver was not permanent, and that other influential players, including the EU and UK, had not yet supported the Biden administration’s move.

OrbiMed’s Borho said: “This is a unique circumstance. I think this will ultimately be narrow and just on the Covid-19 vaccines. I don’t think the Biden administration wants to undermine broad patents for biotech or the pharma industry.”

Backers of the waiver applauded the US government’s decision as an important step towards boosting the global supply of Covid-19 vaccines.

“The pharmaceutical industry has said the pandemic is no time for business as usual,” said Zain Rizvi, access to medicines specialist at Public Citizen. “Funded by billions in taxpayer dollars, [vaccine makers] have a moral imperative to stop opposing efforts aimed at expanding . . . production.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50L2Y1NGJmNzFiLTg3YmUtNDI5MC05Yzk1LTRkMTEwZWVjN2E5MNIBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50L2Y1NGJmNzFiLTg3YmUtNDI5MC05Yzk1LTRkMTEwZWVjN2E5MA?oc=5

2021-05-06 12:52:44Z
CAIiEFtoCAOy3KDjytqL2d5kGZ0qGAgEKg8IACoHCAow-4fWBzD4z0gw_fCpBg

Olympics sponsors duck questions over Beijing 2022 as boycott calls grow - Financial Times

Multinational companies sponsoring the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games are evading questions about their participation as China comes under intense pressure over the repression of Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

As calls for a boycott of the event grow among activists, companies are increasingly being urged to take a stand over Xinjiang — at the same time as the Chinese government has encouraged boycotts of brands that speak out.

Letters from human rights groups have gone unanswered and 11 of the 13 companies that have major sponsorship deals with the International Olympic Committee that include the Beijing games did not comment when asked by the Financial Times if they were reconsidering their plans.

They include Coca-Cola, Visa and Airbnb from the US, Panasonic and Toyota from Japan, and Samsung from South Korea. Alibaba, the only Chinese company that is a full IOC sponsor, also declined to comment.

Allianz, the German insurer, defended its position, saying its presence in nations with a “different view of human rights” contributed to “prosperity and security”. Omega, the Swiss watchmaker, said it was focused on the athletes and its traditional role as the official timekeeper for the Olympics.

The Biden administration in the US and the Canadian, Dutch and UK parliaments have all described the situation in Xinjiang as genocide, after reports of forced sterilisations and forced labour in the northwestern Chinese region.

“No comment isn’t really one of the possible answers on an issue that really has extraordinary support across the political spectrum in a number of countries,” said Sophie Richardson, China director at Human Rights Watch.

China also faces growing criticism over its crack down on the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong, one of several anti-democratic and assertive moves by President Xi Jinping.

The US has held talks with allies, including the UK, about a possible diplomatic boycott of the Winter Olympics.

Despite the reluctance to comment publicly, one person involved in Olympic marketing discussions said the Xinjiang issue was “swirling” among the companies but that executives were uneasy about their role.

Zumretay Arkin of the World Uyghur Congress, an umbrella activist group, said companies were “walking on eggshells” amid the rising calls for boycotts.

“These companies have really beautiful and strong statements about condemning human rights abuses on their websites but when it comes to implementing the policies they just freeze,” she said.

Human rights groups have taken particular aim at Mars because the US food company’s Snickers confectionery division is one of two non-Chinese companies with a sponsorship deal specifically with Beijing, as opposed to being locked into multiple Olympics with IOC deals.

“We’re targeting Snickers because they are a Beijing 2022 sponsor, but also since they pride themselves on having an incredible human rights policy,” said Mandie McKeown of International Tibet Network, one of more than 200 human rights groups that have written two letters to Mars.

Mars, which has not responded to either letter, declined to comment. EF Education, a Swiss company that has a sponsorship deal with Beijing for the 2022 games, also declined to comment.

Activists have targeted Airbnb more than the other IOC sponsors because Beijing places travel restrictions on Uyghur Muslims and Tibetans, including banning them from getting passports which are needed to book Airbnb accommodation in China.

“Partnership with a government whose policies go against the very core of Airbnb’s public commitment to human rights is an affront to that original mission,” they wrote to Airbnb, which has not responded.

The US and dozens of other countries boycotted the summer games in Moscow in 1980 © AFP via Getty Images

DLA Piper, a global law firm, recently removed a post from its public blog in which its lawyers raised the possibility that a legal challenge could be brought against the UK Olympic Association for sending athletes to Beijing, based on a case in New Zealand in 1985 that forced the All Blacks to cancel a rugby tour of South Africa during the apartheid era.

A spokesperson said the post, which was seen by the FT, was not removed due to concern about a backlash. But she declined to explain the rationale for the decision, which occurred after Beijing last month engineered consumer boycotts of Nike and H&M over their previous statements on forced labour.

The FT also contacted 16 companies that sponsor the US Olympic team, including Nike and NBC, asking whether they were concerned about reputational risk for backing a delegation to the games. Delta Air Lines was the only company to respond, saying it had “no affiliation” with the Beijing organising committee or Chinese government.

The US Olympic and Paralympic Committee said “corporate sponsors provide essential financial resources for Team USA. Without sponsors, America’s elite athletes would not be able to compete.”

The IOC said the games were the “only event that brings the entire world together in peaceful competition” and that the diverse participation meant it must be “neutral on all global political issues”.

Lobsang Sangay, head of the Tibetan government in exile, said that amid protests over the 2008 Beijing Olympics, stakeholders, including the IOC, said the move would improve human rights. “It didn’t happen. That shows that even the IOC was taken for a ride,” he said.

Additional reporting by Claire Bushey in Chicago and Thomas Hale in Hong Kong

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50L2JmMDdkZmI3LWY3MGEtNDAwOC04YWIxLTJiMjNiZmJmYjg0ZNIBAA?oc=5

2021-05-06 04:00:13Z
52781572816402

Rabu, 05 Mei 2021

Donald Trump calls continuing Facebook ban 'a total disgrace' - Sky News

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9eUhfLTVVUW95WVnSAQA?oc=5

2021-05-05 21:34:25Z
52781564501558

Malian woman expecting seven babies gives birth to nine in Morocco - Metro.co.uk

Halima Cisse, 25, has given birth to nine babies in an extremely rare case
Halima Cisse, 25, has given birth to nine babies in an extremely rare case

A Malian woman has given birth to nine babies in an extremely rare case of nonuplets.

Halima Cisse, 25, was initially told she was expecting seven babies but doctors missed two on her scans.

She had to be flown out of the poor West African state to Morocco to receive better care on March 30.

There had been reports that doctors were concerned for her health but her government said she, and her five girls and four boys, were all ‘doing well.’

Cases of women successfully carrying septuplets to term are rare – and nonuplets are even rarer.

Moroccan authorities have yet to confirm the case, with health ministry spokesman Rachid Koudhari saying he had no knowledge of such a multiple birth having taken place in one of the country’s hospitals.

But Mali’s health ministry said in a statement that Halima had given birth by Caesarean section.

A Malian from the city of Timbuktu gave birth to 9 newborn babies in Morocco on Tuesday, May 4 The young Malian named Halima Ciss? gave birth to five girls and four boys by Caesarean section. Babies and mother are doing very well, Malian Ministry of Health says. https://www.facebook.com/keurtisDeparis
Halima Cisse was given specialist care in Morocco
A Malian from the city of Timbuktu gave birth to 9 newborn babies in Morocco on Tuesday, May 4 The young Malian named Halima Ciss? gave birth to five girls and four boys by Caesarean section. Babies and mother are doing very well, Malian Ministry of Health says. https://www.facebook.com/keurtisDeparis
The five girls and four boys are all said to be ‘doing well’

‘The mother and babies are doing well so far,’ Mali’s Health Minister Fanta Siby said, adding that she had been kept informed by the Malian doctor who accompanied Halima to Morocco.

They are due to return home in several weeks’ time, she added.

Siby offered her congratulations to ‘the medical teams of Mali and Morocco, whose professionalism is at the origin of the happy outcome of this pregnancy’.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMia2h0dHBzOi8vbWV0cm8uY28udWsvMjAyMS8wNS8wNS9tYWxpYW4td29tYW4tZXhwZWN0aW5nLXNldmVuLWJhYmllcy1naXZlcy1iaXJ0aC10by1uaW5lLWluLW1vcm9jY28tMTQ1MjE5NjIv0gFvaHR0cHM6Ly9tZXRyby5jby51ay8yMDIxLzA1LzA1L21hbGlhbi13b21hbi1leHBlY3Rpbmctc2V2ZW4tYmFiaWVzLWdpdmVzLWJpcnRoLXRvLW5pbmUtaW4tbW9yb2Njby0xNDUyMTk2Mi9hbXAv?oc=5

2021-05-05 07:54:00Z
52781568929197

Donald Trump: Has the former president found a way around his social media ban? - Sky News

Former US president Donald Trump remains banned from Twitter and Facebook but he might have found a way to get around the sanctions.

Mr Trump has launched a space on his website where he posts messages that can be shared by others on their own social networking pages.

The website is called From The Desk Of Donald J Trump, and a source told Reuters it was built by Campaign Nucleus, a digital services company created by Mr Trump's former campaign manager Brad Parscale.

From The Desk Of Donald J Trump
Image: The website allows people to share Donald Trump's thoughts on their own social media pages

The content of Mr Trump's posts so far will not surprise supporters or opponents - he repeats his false claims about voter fraud in the last presidential election, and his criticism of Republicans who have not supported him.

He calls Mitt Romney a "stone-cold loser" and Liz Cheney a "big-shot warmonger".

Mr Trump was banned from a number of social media platforms after his supporters stormed the US Capitol on 6 January.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Trump's new page for social media sharing

Later today, Facebook's oversight board will discuss whether its ban on the 74-year-old should be extended.

More on Donald Trump

Twitter has already said its ban is permanent, regardless of whether he runs for office in future, while YouTube will restore the former president's channel when the risk of violence has decreased.

Both Facebook and Twitter said they have removed content posted from other accounts that tried to circumvent their bans on Mr Trump.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiVWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2hhcy10cnVtcC1mb3VuZC1hLXdheS1hcm91bmQtaGlzLXNvY2lhbC1tZWRpYS1iYW4tMTIyOTcxNzXSAVlodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvaGFzLXRydW1wLWZvdW5kLWEtd2F5LWFyb3VuZC1oaXMtc29jaWFsLW1lZGlhLWJhbi0xMjI5NzE3NQ?oc=5

2021-05-05 05:11:35Z
52781564501558