Selasa, 14 September 2021

Is Russia’s defence chief emerging as Putin’s possible successor? - Al Jazeera English

Even though Vladimir Putin was first elected Russia’s president in 2000, he is currently serving his “zero” term – according to the law that “nullified” his three previous presidencies and the current one.

The legislation, which lets him run for two six-year terms in 2024 and 2030, was symbolically sponsored by lawmaker Valentina Tereshkova, the first woman to fly to space in 1963.

“Simple folks simply asked me” to submit the bill, she said, and the State Duma, Russia’s lower house of parliament dominated by Putin loyalists, adopted it in March 2020.

“’We don’t accept’ must be our only words about the nullification,” opposition leader and anti-corruption crusader Alexey Navalny warned Russians.

Several months later, he barely survived a nerve agent poisoning that he claimed was orchestrated by Putin, and was sentenced to two and a half years in jail this February.

Putin is still pondering the idea of a “first” – or technically fifth – term.

“I have not yet decided whether I would run in 2024,” he said in December 2020.

From the dawn of his presidency, he projected the image of a teetotal, outdoorsy athlete who dabbles in judo, swims – sometimes with dolphins – and rides horses, occasionally and famously without his shirt on.

But on October 7, he is turning 69 – and many wonder who will succeed him, and when.

Pro-Kremlin observers refuse to even name his potential successors from among the current cabinet members.

“Of course, I write about them in classified documents, and many do, but to publicly name them is to pay them lip service,” said analyst Alexey Mukhin, who heads the Center of Political Information, a think-tank in Moscow.

He said that the Kremlin’s list of potential successors will be made public after Putin’s retirement or death.

“It’s not about Putin, it’s about the people who are interested in keeping the list of these names until Hour X,” he told Al Jazeera.

According to Sergei Biziukin, an opposition activist who was forced out of Russia in 2019 after trying to run for president, “Putin is suspicious and secretive. Even if he chose someone as a successor, he won’t reveal it ahead of time.”

“Although I doubt that he considers letting the power go while he’s alive. And dictators rarely care about what happens next.”

Eliminating opponents

Under Putin, the Kremlin scrupulously weeds out all charismatic critics.

Threats and pressure forced Garry Kasparov, a former chess champion-turned protest leader, to flee Russia in 2013.

Scandalous novelist Eduard Limonov, who founded the banned National Bolshevik party, became a Kremlin loyalist after Crimea’s 2014 annexation that he had been advocating since the 1990s.

Putin’s first prime minister, Mikhail Kasyanov, who joined forces with liberal democrat Boris Nemtsov, retired from politics after the latter’s contract-style killing in 2015.

Irina Hakamada, a three-time lawmaker who ran against Putin in 2004, is now a life coach and television personality.

Meanwhile, potential successors from the halls of power have been demoted to irrelevant sinecures.

When Putin’s second term ended in 2008, he handpicked his longtime subordinate Dmitri Medvedev, a bookish and small-framed lawyer, as a temporary successor.

Medvedev initiated cautious reforms while Putin served as his “grey cardinal” premiere before being re-elected for the third time in 2012.

He left his seat to Medvedev – until last year when he dissolved Medvedev’s cabinet and appointed him deputy head of the Security Council, a pasture for relegated has-beens.

And leaders of what critics call the “systemic opposition”, a trio of parties whose minority fractions in the Duma are – according to them – supposed to create an illusion of political pluralism, are aged and politically toothless.

Communist Gennady Zyuganov, who took part in every presidential campaign since 1996, is famously uncharismatic – and 77.

Vladimir Zhirinovsky, 75, is an ultra-nationalist whose outlandish populism and eccentricity have for decades resembled those of former US President Donald Trump.

Zhirinovsky is widely seen as a political clown who lures disgruntled rightists and threatens the West.

The smallest “systemic opposition” party, A Just Russia, is led by Sergey Mironov, 69, an ex-geologist who ran for president twice, promising to nationalise the oil industry and make corruption equal to treason.

He came in last both times.

A hawkish Buddhist

Some observers have put their bets on Defence Minister Sergey Shoigu, Russia’s longest-serving cabinet member and its second-most popular politician after Putin.

Shoigu is a man of startling paradoxes.

His first name is quintessentially Russian, but he hails from Tuva, an impoverished province of Turkic-speaking Buddhists that borders northwestern China and has some of Russia’s highest murder and suicide rates.

Some Tuvan intellectuals even consider him a reincarnation of Subedei, a Mongol general whose army laid waste to what is now Russia and Ukraine eight centuries ago.

Shoigu started his career in the early 1990s as head of the emergencies ministry, making it a highly effective, militarised structure – and topping all political charts years before Putin became president.

Considered a liberal democrat until taking over the defence ministry in 2012, Shoigu spearheaded the Kremlin’s biggest breakthroughs – Crimea’s annexation and the saving of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s government.

Ahead of the September 19 parliamentary vote, Putin appointed him the poster boy of United Russia, the ruling party that has been tanking ignominiously in polls.

The 66-year-old Shoigu is often seen on TV fishing and hunting with Putin – a symbolic anointment that some say makes him the most likely successor.

“He has serious chances, much higher than anyone else for now,” Nikolay Mitrokhin, a researcher with Germany’s Bremen University, told Al Jazeera.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmFsamF6ZWVyYS5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDIxLzkvMTQvaXMtcnVzc2lhcy1kZWZlbmNlLWNoaWVmLWVtZXJnaW5nLWFzLXB1dGlucy1wb3NzaWJsZS1zdWNjZXNzb3LSAWtodHRwczovL3d3dy5hbGphemVlcmEuY29tL2FtcC9uZXdzLzIwMjEvOS8xNC9pcy1ydXNzaWFzLWRlZmVuY2UtY2hpZWYtZW1lcmdpbmctYXMtcHV0aW5zLXBvc3NpYmxlLXN1Y2Nlc3Nvcg?oc=5

2021-09-14 10:54:06Z
52781877706647

Vladimir Putin and Syria's President Assad meet in Moscow for first time since 2015 - Sky News

Syrian President Bashar al Assad has met Vladimir Putin in Moscow - their first meeting in the Russian capital since 2015.

Mr Putin congratulated his counterpart on winning May's presidential election, according to the Kremlin.

The election - in which Mr Assad is said to have won 95% of the vote - was dismissed as a sham by most Western countries.

It was their first meeting in the Russian capital for six years. Pic: AP
Image: It was their first meeting in the Russian capital for six years. Pic: AP

Mr Putin also used Monday's meeting to praise President Assad's renewed grip on the country after a decade of fighting.

The Kremlin quoting him as saying: "Terrorists had sustained a very serious damage, and Syrian government, headed by you, controls 90% of the territories."

However, he reportedly warned that foreign forces being deployed in Syria without a decision by the UN were a hindrance to its consolidation.

The meeting between the two leaders was their first since a summit in Syrian capital Damascus in January 2020.

More on Bashar Al Assad

Russia forces, such as this military police officer, remain in parts of Syria
Image: Russia forces, such as this military police officer, remain in parts of Syria

President Assad also thanked Mr Putin for sending aid to Syria and efforts to halt the "spread of terrorism", the Kremlin said.

He praised what he called the success of Russian and Syrian armies in "liberating occupied territories" of his country and described Western sanctions as "antihuman" and "illegitimate".

Syrian state television said the leaders were later joined by Syria's foreign minister and Russia's defence minister for discussions on fighting terrorism and mutual relations.

Deraa al Balaad in September 2021: Much of Syria has been devastated by the war
Image: Deraa al Balaad in September 2021: Much of Syria has been devastated by the war

Hundreds of thousands have died in Syria's war - which started in 2011 after peaceful protests sparked by the Arab Spring, while millions have fled the country or been internally displaced.

Support from Russia has helped President Assad regain nearly all the territory lost during the conflict.

Hundreds of its troops remain in Syria and opposition activists say Russian jets have recently been carrying out strikes in Idlib province, that last major rebel area.

While the COVID crisis has helped push the conflict out of the headlines, the situation remains bleak with fighting still going on in some areas, food insecurity and a ruined economy.

The UN said this month that 13.4 million Syrians still needed help and urged the need for greater humanitarian access.

Analysis by Alistair Bunkall, Middle East correspondent

Bashar al Assad has made few trips abroad during the decade long conflict in his country, no doubt fearful of what might happen in his absence, but a visit to Moscow is a visit to an ally and comes with little risk.

Without President Putin's support, Assad would have almost certainly lost the Syrian war and been deposed from power.

The Syrian dictator has backing from Iran too, but it was Moscow's intervention in 2015 which helped turn the conflict back in Assad's favour, although there remain pockets of resistance.

Russian fighter jets continue to bomb rebel positions and at times in recent years they came close to US, British and French aircraft operating against Islamic State in the same area.

Putin's support hasn’t come for free though. Russia now has a Mediterranean naval port at Tartus and an airbase outside Latakia – both vital strategic hubs for the Kremlin, easing the dependence on the Black Sea fleet.

It's unclear what Putin actually makes of the Syrian dictator, it's been said he doesn't have much respect for the former eye-surgeon, but the Assad family has ruled Syria for decades and with the lack of any credible cabinet or opposition, the Russian president has few alternatives than the devil he knows.

Either way, both men have done rather well out of the relationship.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3ZsYWRpbWlyLXB1dGluLWFuZC1zeXJpYXMtcHJlc2lkZW50LWFzc2FkLW1lZXQtaW4tbW9zY293LWZvci1maXJzdC10aW1lLXNpbmNlLTIwMTUtMTI0MDc1MzDSAXpodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvdmxhZGltaXItcHV0aW4tYW5kLXN5cmlhcy1wcmVzaWRlbnQtYXNzYWQtbWVldC1pbi1tb3Njb3ctZm9yLWZpcnN0LXRpbWUtc2luY2UtMjAxNS0xMjQwNzUzMA?oc=5

2021-09-14 06:56:15Z
52781877706647

Senin, 13 September 2021

Democrats propose partial rollback of Trump tax cuts - BBC News

Democrat Richard Neal, chair of the Ways and Means committee, which Nancy Pelosi
Getty Images

Leading Democrats have released plans for a partial rollback of former US President Donald Trump's tax cuts.

Members of the powerful Ways and Means Committee, which sets tax policy, propose raising the top rate of corporation tax to 26.5% from 21%.

Wealthy individuals would see a jump in their income taxes, as well as higher capital gains and inheritance taxes.

The plans, to be debated this week, would help fund the Democrats' $3.5 trillion domestic investment plan.

Currently not one Republican in Congress supports that bill, which would pay for a big expansion of social services for the elderly and children and tackle climate change.

Under Mr Trump, the Republicans slashed the top rate of corporate tax from 35% in 2017, arguing it would boost economic growth and create jobs.

But the Democrats say the cuts favoured the wealthy and only provided a short-term lift to the US economy.

Their proposals would only partially reverse Mr Trump's cuts to corporate tax - bringing in a graduated rate of 18% on annual income below $400,000, 21% on income up to $5m and 26.5% on income above $5m.

The benefit of the graduated rate would phase out for firms making more than $10m.

Higher inheritance tax

However, their plans for individual taxation would take the top rate back to its pre-2017 level - from 37% to 39.6%. This would apply to taxable income above $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for married couples.

Republicans have been critical of plans to raise inheritance tax. They doubled the threshold at which it is paid to £24m in 2017, but Democrats want to reverse this four years sooner than planned, in 2021 rather than 2025.

They also plan to increase capital gains tax paid on assets such as stocks and bonds to 25% for those with incomes above $400,000, up from 20% currently. An additional 3% surcharge would be imposed on taxable income in excess of $5m.

The plans are designed to raise $2.9tn over 10 years to help fund the $3.5tn "reconciliation" bill, which will require a simple majority in the Senate to be passed.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi aims to have a vote in the Democratic-controlled House as soon as the end of this month, although the final version of the bill will be scaled back somewhat to win the support of moderate Democrats in the Senate, where Democrats have 50 of the 100 seats.

Democratic Vice-President Kamala Harris casts the tie-breaking vote when needed.

In addition to raising taxes, Democrats propose using the US tax code to encourage the construction of more low-income housing, and are seeking sizeable tax credits for the purchase of electric vehicles.

Committee Democrats also said there would be a provision in the bill to "level the playing field by cutting taxes for our nation's smallest businesses".

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2J1c2luZXNzLTU4NTUwMDIx0gEwaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYnVzaW5lc3MtNTg1NTAwMjEuYW1w?oc=5

2021-09-13 19:34:18Z
52781876262511

Blinken defends US military’s chaotic Afghanistan withdrawal - Financial Times

Antony Blinken, the US secretary of state, gave an unapologetic defence of the American military’s chaotic and bloody withdrawal from Afghanistan as he appeared before lawmakers on Capitol Hill.

In prepared remarks released ahead of a hearing before the House foreign affairs committee on Monday, Blinken said “even the most pessimistic assessments did not predict that government forces in Kabul would collapse while US forces remained”, and there was “no evidence” that a longer presence would have changed the outcome.

“If 20 years and hundreds of billions of dollars in support, equipment, and training did not suffice, why would another year, or five, or 10, make a difference?” Blinken asked.

“Conversely, there is nothing that strategic competitors like China and Russia — or adversaries like Iran and North Korea — would have liked more than for the United States to re-up a 20-year war and remain bogged down in Afghanistan for another decade,” he added.

Michael McCaul, the top Republican on the House foreign affairs committee, called the Afghan pullout an “unmitigated disaster of epic proportions” at the start of Monday’s hearing, and warned that many Afghans now risked being executed by the Taliban. He said the US would be severely limited in countering the terrorist threat in the country.

“We have no eyes and ears on the ground. We’ve lost intelligence capability in the region,” McCaul said. Blinken responded that he believed the US could “effectively” deal with terrorism without “boots on the ground”.

“We lost some capacity for sure, in not having those boots on the ground in Afghanistan, but we have ways, and we are very actively working on that, to make up for that,” Blinken said.

Biden administration officials have said that their options for managing the withdrawal were limited by former president Donald Trump’s own deal with the Taliban, which originally set a May 1 date for the pullout. President Joe Biden later extended that to August 31.

Brad Sherman, a California Democrat, asked Blinken how “meticulous” the Trump administration’s planning had been for the military exit, to which Blinken responded: “We inherited a deadline. We did not inherit a plan.”

The Biden administration has been heavily criticised for misreading the situation on the ground in Afghanistan ahead of its withdrawal last month, and for ploughing ahead with the pullout by August 31 even as the Taliban captured the country’s main cities and took control of Kabul.

As thousands of people attempting to flee the country surrounded Hamid Karzai International Airport in the final days of the US’s military presence, a terrorist attack at the gates of the airport killed scores of people, including Afghan civilians and 13 members of the US military.

Meanwhile, thousands of vulnerable Afghans who had helped coalition forces during the 20-year conflict were left behind, as were up to 200 Americans, some of who remain in the country.

“We will continue to help Americans — and Afghans to whom we have a special commitment — depart Afghanistan if they choose, just as we’ve done in other countries where we’ve evacuated our embassy and hundreds or even thousands of Americans remained behind — for example, in Libya, Syria, Venezuela, Yemen, and Somalia. There is no deadline to this mission,” Blinken said.

He said the US would continue to provide humanitarian assistance to the country, even though the Taliban, which is under US sanctions, now controls Afghanistan. “Consistent with sanctions, this aid will not flow through the government, but rather through independent organizations like NGOs and UN agencies.”

Democrats mostly supported Blinken’s defence. After Joe Wilson, a Republican from South Carolina, called on Blinken to resign, Gerry Connolly, a Democrat from Virginia, said: “What we’re listening to on the other side of the aisle, sadly, is sort of a salad mix of selective facts — and a lot of amnesia in the salad dressing”. 

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzAxMDJlNDExLTBlZGQtNDVhNS1hMDVhLTg1NjMyZDUzOTdjN9IBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzAxMDJlNDExLTBlZGQtNDVhNS1hMDVhLTg1NjMyZDUzOTdjNw?oc=5

2021-09-13 19:31:29Z
52781877993782

Interpreter Sharif Karimi left behind in Kabul kidnapped by Taliban - The Times

A former interpreter who served alongside British forces and did not make it through the checkpoints to the airport for an evacuation flight was kidnapped by the Taliban.

Sharif Karimi, 31, who requested to be named, said that he was taken by 25 members of the Taliban in three vehicles and was beaten before being held for four days in a tiny cell with barely any oxygen.

Karimi, a married father of four originally from Lashkar Gar, said that he was eventually released because local elders intervened and his family managed to pay the group $21,500.

He said: “They beat me a lot and I am depressed. They put me in a very bad small place and I couldn’t lie down or sleep for days.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXRpbWVzLmNvLnVrL2FydGljbGUvaW50ZXJwcmV0ZXItc2hhcmlmLWthcmltaS1sZWZ0LWJlaGluZC1pbi1rYWJ1bC1raWRuYXBwZWQtYnktdGFsaWJhbi04Z2M3bDZwMm7SAQA?oc=5

2021-09-13 16:00:00Z
52781874661824

Moment rescue dog realises they have a forever home leaves TikTok users in tears - Daily Express

Since uploading the clip to the video sharing site, over 10 million people have viewed Athena's happy ending.

Thousands of dog lovers who watched the touching moment left their reactions in the comments section.

One person said: "She looks so much part of the family already."

Another TikTok user said: "The way she stops in her tracks like ‘wait, I'm going home?’

"I'm so happy for that puppy, hope she lives the rest of her life happy."

READ MORE: Rescue dog has never wagged his tail

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy93b3JsZC8xNDkwNTc1L3RlYW1kb2dzLXJlc2N1ZS1kb2ctZm9yZXZlci1ob21lLWxlYXZlcy1taWxsaW9ucy1vbi10aWt0b2staW4tdGVhcnPSAXRodHRwczovL3d3dy5leHByZXNzLmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvMTQ5MDU3NS90ZWFtZG9ncy1yZXNjdWUtZG9nLWZvcmV2ZXItaG9tZS1sZWF2ZXMtbWlsbGlvbnMtb24tdGlrdG9rLWluLXRlYXJzL2FtcA?oc=5

2021-09-13 15:07:00Z
CBMicGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy93b3JsZC8xNDkwNTc1L3RlYW1kb2dzLXJlc2N1ZS1kb2ctZm9yZXZlci1ob21lLWxlYXZlcy1taWxsaW9ucy1vbi10aWt0b2staW4tdGVhcnPSAXRodHRwczovL3d3dy5leHByZXNzLmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvMTQ5MDU3NS90ZWFtZG9ncy1yZXNjdWUtZG9nLWZvcmV2ZXItaG9tZS1sZWF2ZXMtbWlsbGlvbnMtb24tdGlrdG9rLWluLXRlYXJzL2FtcA

COVID-19: Coronavirus vaccines should be offered to children aged 12 to 15, chief medical officers decide - Sky News

Children aged 12 to 15 should be offered a COVID vaccine, the UK's chief medical officers (CMOs) have decided.

The medical officers said their recommendation to the government was made after considering "what effect this will have on transmission in schools and effects on education".

"It's a useful tool to reduce the disruption," they said.

Healthy children should be offered a single dose of the Pfizer vaccine and the rollout should begin "as soon as possible", they added.

Latest COVID updates from the UK and around the world

The move means around three million children could be eligible for the jab, which is expected to be given through schools.

The government has confirmed it will "set out" its decision "shortly" following the recommendation.

More on Covid-19

In their advice to the government, the CMOs said they were recommending vaccines on "public health grounds" and it was "likely vaccination will help reduce transmission of COVID-19 in schools".

They added: "COVID-19 is a disease which can be very effectively transmitted by mass spreading events, especially with Delta variant.

"Having a significant proportion of pupils vaccinated is likely to reduce the probability of such events which are likely to cause local outbreaks in, or associated with, schools.

"They will also reduce the chance an individual child gets COVID-19. This means vaccination is likely to reduce (but not eliminate) education disruption."

The CMOs have asked for the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) to look at whether second doses should be given to those aged 12 to 15 once more data comes through internationally.

This will not be before the spring term.

The CMOs think a single dose will significantly reduce the chance of a young person getting COVID and passing the virus on.

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

After seeking advice from a range of experts, including medical colleges, the CMOs said they consider education "one of the most important drivers of improved public health and mental health".

But the CMOs added: "Local surges of infection, including in schools, should be anticipated for some time. Where they occur, they are likely to be disruptive."

The NHS in England had already been asked to prepare to roll out vaccines for all 12 to 15-year-olds in the event the CMOs recommended the programme.

In a news conference at Downing Street, England's chief medical officer said it was agreed by the CMOs that vaccination would reduce disruption to education.

Professor Chris Whitty said: "Our view was the benefit exceeded the risk to a sufficient degree that we are recommending to our ministers in all four nations that they make a universal offer - and I want to stress the word 'offer' - of vaccination to children 12 to 15, in addition to the ones that have already been given it.

"That is our current advice to ministers and it is now with them to decide in each of the four nations how they wish to respond."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Professor Chris Whitty said 'this is not a silver bullet' although it is an 'important and potentially useful additional tool'

A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "We have received advice from the four UK chief medical officers on offering COVID-19 vaccination to young people aged 12-15.

"We will set out the government's decision shortly."

It comes following a review by the four CMOs of the decision by the JCVI not to advise the move.

Last week, the JCVI said it would not be recommending giving COVID vaccines to children aged 12 to 15 on health grounds alone.

Children recently returned to school and there are concerns of a rise in cases following the summer holidays.

The JCVI advised the government to look at "wider issues" - including the impact on schooling - when making the final decision.

The independent regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), approved the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for those aged 12 and over after ruling they met strict standards of safety and effectiveness.

In its advisory report, the JCVI said the "individual" health benefits from vaccination for children aged 12 to 15 was small.

The risk of potentially serious side effects - including myocarditis - is "very rare, but potentially serious".

The Department of Health previously said that, like other school vaccination programmes, parent or carer consent will be sought.

Health Secretary Sajid Javid told Sky News that a child's decision "will prevail" in the case of a conflict.

The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health welcomed the recommendation by the CMOs - but called for further measures to prevent disruption to education and wellbeing.

It said vaccination would allow children "to have less interruption to school attendance" and "give more protection to friends and family members whose health may be at risk from the virus".

But it added vaccination is "not a silver bullet" and "must be part of a concerted overall plan" to ensure "uninterrupted access" to school.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMihwFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9jb3ZpZC0xOS1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy12YWNjaW5lcy10by1iZS1vZmZlcmVkLXRvLWNoaWxkcmVuLWFnZWQtMTItdG8tMTUtY2hpZWYtbWVkaWNhbC1vZmZpY2Vycy1kZWNpZGUtMTI0MDI4NTXSAYsBaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2NvdmlkLTE5LWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLXZhY2NpbmVzLXRvLWJlLW9mZmVyZWQtdG8tY2hpbGRyZW4tYWdlZC0xMi10by0xNS1jaGllZi1tZWRpY2FsLW9mZmljZXJzLWRlY2lkZS0xMjQwMjg1NQ?oc=5

2021-09-13 13:57:59Z
52781874262216