Rabu, 10 Mei 2023

Imran Khan: Violence and mass arrests as former Pakistan PM charged with corruption - BBC

Police use teargas to disperse Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party activists and supporters (foreground) of former Pakistan's Prime Minister Imran Khan during a protest against the arrest of their leader, in Islamabad on May 10, 2023.Getty Images

Pakistan's former prime minister Imran Khan has pleaded not guilty to corruption charges a day after his arrest sparked nationwide protests.

Eight people have died nationwide in the protests and about 1,000 have been arrested, police say.

The army is being deployed in some areas, and has issued a stern warning after crowds attacked its properties.

Mr Khan's arrest dramatically escalated tensions between Mr Khan and the military at a time of economic crisis.

Conviction would disqualify the former cricket star - prime minister from 2018 to 2022 - from standing for office, possibly for life. Elections are due later this year.

Dramatic footage showed dozens of security officers forcibly removing the 70-year-old from court on Tuesday, then bundling him into a police vehicle.

There is tight security at the police guesthouse where he is being detained, which is also serving as a courtroom.

On Wednesday Mr Khan was indicted on charges that he unlawfully sold state gifts during his premiership, in a case brought by the Election Commission.

He denies the allegations and says he fulfilled all legal requirements.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

It was the first of dozens of cases against him in which he has been formally charged.

For months he had avoided arrest, with his supporters at times fighting pitched battles with police to keep him out of custody.

Tuesday's arrest was based on a new warrant for a separate corruption case, connected to the alleged transfer of land for Al-Qadir University, near Islamabad. The judge remanded Mr Khan in custody for eight days in this case.

One of his lawyers, Sher Afzal Marwat, said his client was faring well and relayed a message to supporters not to give up: "You have to stand your ground for Rule of Law," Mr Khan said.

His Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party said it would challenge the legality of his arrest in court.

The action by Pakistan's anti-corruption body has led to violent protests across the country.

The government has called the army in to maintain order in several regions of the country, including Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Punjab, Balochistan, and Islamabad.

In a televised address to the nation, Pakistan's Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, warned that violent protests would not be tolerated.

"The perpetrators who take the law into their own hands will be dealt with with an iron hand," he said.

Extraordinary scenes on Tuesday evening showed Mr Khan's supporters ransacking the corps commander's residence in Lahore, smashing chandeliers and making away with peacocks - among other things - which they said were bought with "citizen's money".

Pakistan's army described 9 May as a "dark day" and warned protesters of an "extreme reaction" if properties of the state were attacked again.

Imran Khan at his residence in Lahore in March
Rex / Shutterstock

Police in Islamabad used shipping containers to try to block routes to the compound where Imran Khan was appearing before a judge.

The BBC witnessed clashes between protesters and the police in the middle of one of Islamabad's main motorways.

Protesters began gathering after midday, some carrying with them PTI flags or wearing Imran Khan face masks.

Canisters of tear gas were fired into the crowd soon after they began to gather. The protesters attempted to hit the metal casings away using their sticks. There were no arrests during the 90 minutes the BBC were present.

Police use tear gas shells against supporters of Imran Khan

"We came to do a peaceful protest, but these police are shelling us," one man, who was holding stones and a stick and wearing a surgical mask, told the BBC.

"Until our death we will continue this protest or until they free Imran. Otherwise we will shut the whole country."

Mr Khan was ousted last April, less than four years into his term as prime minister.

In November, he was shot in the leg while campaigning among crowds in the city of Wazirabad. He has accused a senior intelligence official of carrying out the attack - an accusation strongly denied by the military. A day before his arrest, the military had warned Mr Khan against repeating the allegation.

Mr Khan's party says he faces more than 100 court cases, which he says are politically motivated.

His supporters argue that the current government wants to bar him from contesting general elections due in October.

Dr Shireen Mazari, the former Minister for Human Rights in Mr Khan's PTI government, told the BBC that the way Mr Khan had been detained amounted to state abduction.

"We don't expect even the military to abuse the sanctity of the court in this way," she said, adding that people in Pakistan were "seething with anger" at the way he had been treated, as well as wider economic problems.

However, Islamabad's High Court declared the arrest legal.

Policemen stand guard along a roadside in Karachi on May 10, 2023
Getty Images

"Mr Imran Khan will face the law, if innocent, [he] can contest the election. But if found guilty of corruption, he will have to face the consequence of that," Minister of Planning Ahsan Iqbal told a press conference on Wednesday.

Police have arrested supporters of Mr Khan's party, including Asad Umar, its secretary-general.

Mobile internet services remain heavily restricted across the country. Pakistan's telecommunication authorities said they had suspended services on instructions from the interior ministry.

Schools also remain closed, some highways have been blocked and there is little traffic on roads in major cities.

Many analysts believe Mr Khan's election win in 2018 happened with the help of the military. But amid a growing economic crisis, observers say he fell out of favour with the powerful military, the crucial behind-the-scenes player in nuclear-armed Pakistan.

Since being in opposition, he has become one of the military's most vocal critics.

Additional reporting by Farhat Javed, Usman Zahid and Malik Mudassir in Islamabad and Kelly Ng in Singapore

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC1hc2lhLTY1NTQxMjE10gEwaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvbS9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLWFzaWEtNjU1NDEyMTUuYW1w?oc=5

2023-05-10 19:30:32Z
2017330983

George Santos arrested live: Rep calls probe ‘witch hunt’ after pleading not guilty to 13 charges - The Independent

George Santos pleads not guilty to 13 charges, including wire fraud and theft

George Santos, the New York congressman who rose to prominence for a string of exaggerations, lies, and irregularities related to his personal background and campaign finances, pleaded not guilty after being hit with a series of federal charges.

He told the press after exiting the courthouse on Wednesday that the probe is a “witch hunt” and that he’s planning to run for reelection. Mr Santos surrendered to the authorities and was taken into custody at a federal courthouse.

He was released on a $500,000 bond ahead of his next court appearance on 30 June.

Mr Santos has been charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives.

Utah GOP Senator Mitt Romney led the calls for him to go, saying, “He has demonstrated by his untruthfulness that he should not be in the United States Congress — perhaps should not even be on the public streets”.

1683759623

VIDEO: George Santos pleads not guilty to 13 charges, including wire fraud and theft

George Santos pleads not guilty to 13 charges, including wire fraud and theft
Gustaf Kilander11 May 2023 00:00
1683757823

George Santos and the fascinating psychology of compulsive liars

Anyone who’s taken a passing look at the news lately knows it’s been a bad week for George Santos. Charged with crimes ranging from false statements to fraud on Wednesday, the former golden boy of the Republican Party may be about to end his career in a spectacular flame-out even his most ardent detractors couldn’t have predicted.

When the 34-year-old representative from New York’s 3rd congressional district flipped the seat in the November midterms, it was celebrated by Republicans as a rare and significant victory. This was a once-safe Democratic seat, where people voted for Joe Biden by a double-digit margin in 2020. How did Santos do it? As his house of cards comes tumbling down, the answer seems to be: By fictionalizing himself into the perfect candidate.

Aside from the financial and legal crimes he’s now been charged with, Santos also stands accused of lying about the entire contents of his résumé, including where he went to college, and even where he went to high school; whether he is married to a man or a woman (he spoke of a husband in his campaign bio, but records only appear to show a marriage and divorce to a woman); how his mother died (not in 9/11, it turns out); whether his grandmother was in the Holocaust and indeed whether any of his family is actually Jewish (it appears they are all actually Brazilian Catholics.) An indictment suggests he allegedly lied about being unemployed in order to collect fraudulent benefits, and spent “thousands of dollars [in campaign funds solicited from the public] on personal expenses, including luxury designer clothing and credit card payments”. He even seems to have claimed he was running an imaginary animal charity. These alleged lies range from the very serious to the comically absurd, from the personal to the professional, and from the clearly self-serving to the head-scratchingly strange. There is a feeling of compulsion to them.

Read more:

Holly Baxter10 May 2023 23:30
1683756023

From resume lies to criminal charges: A timeline of George Santos’ many scandals

On Wednesday 10 May, the embattled congressman was arrested on a string of 13 federal criminal charges.

Mr Santos was charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives, according to the indictment.

He surrendered to authorities at a federal court on Long Island.

Federal prosecutors accused Mr Santos of lying on financial disclosure forms he filed to the House when he became a candidate. The first count alleges that he overstated his income from one job and failed to disclose income from another. The second alleges that he lied about his earnings from his company, the Devolder Organization.

Prosecutors also allege that Mr Santos fraudulently used donations to his political campaign for his own benefit, spending “thousands of dollars of the solicited funds on personal expenses, including luxury designer clothing and credit card payments.”

Mr Santos is also accused of an unemployment insurance fraud scheme before his successful congressional campaign in which he applied for government assistance in New York while still employed by a Florida-based investment firm.

The arrest marks the latest in a growing number of scandals circling Mr Santos.

The saga began even before he was sworn-in on the 118th Congress.

Dogged by surely one of the oddest scandals to hit American politics in the last few years, Mr Santos was facing calls for his expulsion and resignation even before he was seated as representative for New York’s 3rd Congressional District.

Let’s take a look back at how this scandal evolved, from the beginning to now:

John Bowden10 May 2023 23:00
1683754223

George Santos: Every lie disgraced Republican Congressman has been accused of making

It can be difficult keeping up with the list of fictions that George Santos has been accused of telling, admitted telling, or merely been caught spinning red-handed following a contradictory statement.

But, do not fret: The Independent is here, and we’re keeping track of the whole list of lies even as it continues to grow — both in number and in the sheer scale of the humiliation that it presents for not just Mr Santos, who remains adamant that he will serve two years in office as representative for New York’s third district, but for the Republican House caucus as a whole.

For months now, home state Republicans and Democrats alike called for his resignation from Congress while major conservative groups vowed not to work with him.

Still, he found a niche for himself among the GOP’s far-right Maga caucus, among fellows like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Matt Gaetz.

On Wednesday 11 January, New York Republicans called on Mr Santos to resign, saying that he “disgraced the House of Representatives”. Mr Santos, meanwhile, held firm, telling reporters that he “will not” step down.

Then, on 31 January, Mr Santos announced he was stepping down from his committee assignments following a meeting with House Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

But, things really took a turn on 9 May, when Mr Santos was arrested and hit with 13 federal charges from the Justice Department.

The embattled congressman was charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives.

He was arrested after surrendering to authorities at a federal court on Long Island the following morning (10 May).

So, with scrutiny continuing to mount on Mr Santos, let’s dive in to every fabrication, fiction, lie, mistruth, and “embellishment” that he has admitted to telling or been caught spreading by journalists and others (so far):

John Bowden10 May 2023 22:30
1683753323

Separating fact from the many, fabulous fabrications of George Santos

He surrendered to federal law enforcement and was taken to the Eastern District of New York federal courthouse in Central Islip, on Long Island, where he pleaded not guilty in a brief court appearance.

In 2022, Mr Santos was elected as the Republican Party’s first openly gay, non-incumbent member of Congress, and touted himself as a living embodiment of the American dream.

Here’s what we know about George Anthony Devolder Santos:

Bevan Hurley10 May 2023 22:15
1683752423

Santos’s travel limited as part of bond agreement

According to his bond agreement, Mr Santos will be allowed to travel to New York City, Long Island, and Washington, DC.

But he will have to get permission from pretrial services if he wants to travel anywhere else in the continental US, according to CNN.

He also had to hand over his passport to the federal authorities, meaning that he won’t be able to go abroad.

Gustaf Kilander10 May 2023 22:00
1683751823

Santos lawyer tries to avoid media following arraignment

Gustaf Kilander10 May 2023 21:50
1683751223

Santos’ drag show past exposed

The accusation emerged in January when the veteran Brazilian drag performer Eula Rochard, 58, told Reuters that she had first encountered the individual she alleged was Mr Santos in 2005 at the first gay pride parade held in Niteroi, a suburb of Rio de Janeiro, saying she also remembered seeing him compete in a drag pageant in the same city three years later, much more flamboyantly attired on the second occasion.

“He’s changed a lot, but he was always a liar,” Ms Rochard said. “He was always such a dreamer.”

She said she came forward to make her allegation against Mr Santos after spotting him on television, excitedly telling her friends and then reacting to their disbelief by digging out an old photograph she insisted showed the pair of them together in costume, later posting it on Instagram.

In an interview with Maria Kabas of The Handbasket on Substack, Ms Rochard said: “I think I met him when he was around 16 or 17 years old… He used to hang out in my house while his mom was playing Bingo.

“The picture was taken in 2008 at the Pride Parade at Icarai Beach in Niteroi. George had disappeared for a little while, and then returned to Brazil with a lot of money, and that was about the same time when the picture was taken.”

Ms Rochard added that Mr Santos “did not have what it takes to be a professional” as a drag performer, adding that he “used to create stories, usually involving money – like that his dad was rich”.

Joe Sommerlad10 May 2023 21:40
1683750623

Santos booed when he attempts to change subject to Biden

Gustaf Kilander10 May 2023 21:30
1683750055

False statements to House of Reps: two counts of making false statements

The indictment claims Mr Santos “knowingly and willfully” made false statements on his personal financial disclosure reports to the Clerk of the House which was delivered to the House Committee on Ethics.

In one count, federal prosecutors allege Mr Santos overstated the amount of money he made from a single source in May 2020 as $55,000 when he actually earned $27,555 from one company and $25,403 in income from an investment firm.

The other count alleges Mr Santos falsely reported the amount of money he made from 2021 until the filing date in September 2022.

Mr Santos claimed on his personal financial report he earned $750,000 from the Devolder Organization LLC, had unearned dividends from the company of $1m to $5m, owned a checking account with $100,000 to $250,000 and owned a savings account with $1m to $5m.

The indictment does not provide detail as to what the actual amounts were but says the reported amounts were untruthful.

It also says Mr Santos failed to report the $28,107 he made from an investment firm nor the unemployment insurance benefits he received from New York.

Ariana Baio10 May 2023 21:20

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMic2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvYW1lcmljYXMvdXMtcG9saXRpY3MvZ2VvcmdlLXNhbnRvcy1uZXdzLWFycmVzdGVkLWNoYXJnZWQtcmVwLWIyMzM2NTAzLmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2023-05-10 22:00:23Z
2008520937

George Santos pleads not guilty to fraud and theft charges as he calls case 'witch hunt' - Sky News

US Republican congressman George Santos described the case against him a "witch hunt" as he pleaded not guilty to charges of fraud, money laundering and theft of public funds.

The 34-year-old US politician appeared in court in New York and pleaded not guilty to the 13 charges against him, around five hours after his arrest.

Prosecutors claim he used election campaign donations to buy designer clothes, lied about being a millionaire, and collected unemployment benefits.

After leaving court proceedings, Santos said "it's a witch hunt" adding that he would clear his name and would not resign and will run for re-election.

He could face up to 20 years in prison if convicted.

Santos has been charged with seven counts of wire fraud, three counts of money laundering, one count of theft of public funds, and two counts of making materially false statements to the House of Representatives.

The indictment charges Santos with defrauding prospective political supporters by laundering funds to pay for his personal expenses and illegally receiving unemployment benefits while he was employed.

He is also accused of making false statements to the House of Representatives about his assets, income and liabilities.

George Santos

He was released from custody on a $500,000 (£396,000) bond.

Since he was elected to Congress in November, Santos has been at the centre of a web of extraordinary revelations and accusations covering everything from his heritage to jobs he simply never held.

Federal prosecutors have been examining false statement allegations in Santos's campaign filings.

Federal prosecutor Breon Peace said the indictment "seeks to hold Santos accountable for various alleged fraudulent schemes and brazen misrepresentations".

"Taken together, the allegations in the indictment charge Santos with relying on repeated dishonesty and deception to ascend to the halls of Congress and enrich himself," he added.

Santos has repeatedly defied calls to resign, after details of his fictitious resume came to light. Shortly after his election victory, a New York Times investigation found a number of false claims he made on his CV about his personal and professional history.

He is accused of fabricating parts of his CV while running for Congress.

Among other claims, Santos said he had degrees from New York University and Baruch College, despite neither institution's having any record of his attending. He claimed to have worked at Goldman Sachs and Citigroup, which also was untrue.

Click to subscribe to the Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts

Many of his fellow New York Republicans called on him to resign after his history of fabrications was revealed.

US House Majority Leader Steve Scalise has said the charges against Santos are "serious", but added, "there's a presumption of innocence".

Questions about Santos's finances also surfaced.

In regulatory filings, Santos said he had loaned his campaign and related political action committees more than $750,000 (£594,000), but it was unclear how he would have come into that kind of wealth so quickly after years in which he struggled to pay his rent and faced multiple eviction proceedings.

In a financial disclosure form, Santos had reported making $750,000 a year plus dividends from a family company, the Devolder Organisation. He later described that business as a broker for sales of luxury items including yachts and aircraft.

The business was incorporated in Florida shortly after Santos stopped working as a salesman for a company accused by federal authorities of operating an illegal Ponzi scheme.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiemh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2dlb3JnZS1zYW50b3MtcGxlYWRzLW5vdC1ndWlsdHktdG8tZnJhdWQtYW5kLXRoZWZ0LWNoYXJnZXMtYXMtaGUtY2FsbHMtY2FzZS13aXRjaC1odW50LTEyODc3ODE40gF-aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2dlb3JnZS1zYW50b3MtcGxlYWRzLW5vdC1ndWlsdHktdG8tZnJhdWQtYW5kLXRoZWZ0LWNoYXJnZXMtYXMtaGUtY2FsbHMtY2FzZS13aXRjaC1odW50LTEyODc3ODE4?oc=5

2023-05-10 19:17:55Z
2008520937

Russia Victory Day: Putin denounces West during parade speech - The Times

President Putin railed against the West as he oversaw a muted Victory Day parade stripped of three essential ingredients: tanks, aircraft and Russian success in Ukraine.

He used the annual address marking the defeat of Nazi Germany to make a series of accusations against western powers, claiming they had provoked conflict, sown hatred and destroyed family values, as he sought to make the case for his faltering war.

Hours after launching a new barrage of cruise missiles at Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, Putin accused the West of “unleashing war against Russia” after “forgetting who defeated the Nazis” and “creating a new cult of Nazism” through the destruction of Soviet memorials in eastern Europe.

The parade marks the 78th anniversary of the end of the Second World War

The parade marks the 78th anniversary of the end of the Second World War

ALEXANDER ZEMLIANICHENKO/AP

Russians watch a Victory Day parade in Vladivostok

Russians watch a Victory Day parade in Vladivostok

TATIANA MEEL/REUTERS

He accused “globalist elites” of making the Ukrainian people “hostages to

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXRpbWVzLmNvLnVrL2FydGljbGUvcnVzc2lhLXZpY3RvcnktZGF5LTIwMjMtdmxhZGltaXItcHV0aW4tc3BlZWNoLXBhcmFkZS11a3JhaW5lLThzZDdsbXQ1ZtIBAA?oc=5

2023-05-10 08:58:01Z
1963936856

Police from Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands need help to identify 22 dead women and girls - Sky News

Police in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands are asking for the public's help to identify 22 women and girls who they believe have been murdered.

The bodies were discovered across the three European countries between October 1976 and August 2019.

"Most of the 22 victims died violently, and some were also abused or starved before they died," said Carina van Leeuwen and Martin de Wit in a statement by the Netherlands police, which initiated the public appeal.

They added: "Partly because the women are likely from countries other than where they were found, their identities have not yet been established.

"It is possible that their bodies were left in our countries to impede criminal investigations."

This tattoo was found on a woman's left forearm. Her body was discovered in in the Groot Schijn River in Antwerp, Belgium in June 1992. Pic: Interpol
Image: This tattoo was found on a woman's left forearm. Her body was discovered in the Groot Schijn River in Antwerp, Belgium, in June 1992. Pic: Interpol

"We want to stress that we are looking for names," said Carolien Opdecam, of the Belgian police force.

"The victim's identity is often the key to unlocking the mysteries of a case."

With some of the murdered women believed to have come from specific regions in Eastern Europe, identifying them may also provide evidence on the perpetrators of these crimes.

Anja Allendorf, of the German police, said: "In similar investigations, establishing the victim's identity ultimately has led to the arrest of a suspect."

The police forces of all three countries have come together to launch Operation Identify Me through Interpol.

A suitcase containing the torso of a female was found in a canal in Amsterdam in September 1992. The victim's hands, legs and other body parts were discovered elsewhere. Pic: Interpol
Image: A suitcase containing the torso of a female was found in a canal in Amsterdam in September 1992. The victim's hands, legs and other body parts were discovered elsewhere. Pic: Interpol

The international police group has for the first time made public some details of so-called black notices which are used to seek information and intelligence on unidentified bodies and to determine the circumstances surrounding the death.

Black notices are usually circulated internally among Interpol's global network of police forces.

The cold cases include a woman with a flower tattoo who was found in the Groot Schijn River in Antwerp, Belgium; the discovery of a body which had been burned in a forest in Altena-Bergfeld in Germany; and the remains of a female believed to be 16-35 years old which were found in a bag in the IJ River in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

The facial reconstruction of a woman whose body was found buried in a forest northwest of Berlin, Germany, in November 1998. She was dressed in men's clothing. Pic: Interpol
Image: The facial reconstruction of a woman whose body was found buried in a forest northwest of Berlin, Germany, in November 1998. She was dressed in men's clothing. Pic: Interpol

Details on each case have been made available on the Interpol website showing facial reconstructions of some of the victims, as well as videos and pictures of items such as jewellery and clothing which were discovered at the various sites where their remains were dumped.

It also includes information such as their estimated age, hair and eye colour and other physical characteristics.

Members of the public, particularly those who remember a missing friend or family member, are being invited to contact their relevant national police team should they have any information.

Read more from Sky News:
Trump attacks 'biased' judge after jury finds he sexually abused writer
Man pleads guilty to hacking stars' Twitter accounts
Ireland fails to qualify for grand final of Eurovision Song Contest

This bracelet is believed to belong to a victim whose body was found wrapped in plastic in Amstelveen, the Netherlands in January 1995. Pic: Interpol
Image: This bracelet is believed to belong to a victim whose body was found wrapped in plastic in Amstelveen, the Netherlands, in January 1995. Pic: Interpol

"Black Notices allow law enforcement agencies to collaborate and share information across borders, ultimately helping to bring closure to the families of the deceased and bring offenders to justice," said Susan Hitchin, coordinator of Interpol's DNA Unit.

"Advances in technology across the different fields of forensic human identification have been significant in helping solve cold cases."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMigQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9wb2xpY2UtZnJvbS1iZWxnaXVtLWdlcm1hbnktYW5kLXRoZS1uZXRoZXJsYW5kcy1uZWVkLWhlbHAtdG8taWRlbnRpZnktMjItZGVhZC13b21lbi1hbmQtZ2lybHMtMTI4Nzc0MjXSAYUBaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3BvbGljZS1mcm9tLWJlbGdpdW0tZ2VybWFueS1hbmQtdGhlLW5ldGhlcmxhbmRzLW5lZWQtaGVscC10by1pZGVudGlmeS0yMi1kZWFkLXdvbWVuLWFuZC1naXJscy0xMjg3NzQyNQ?oc=5

2023-05-10 06:37:43Z
2019050401

Russia Victory Day: Putin denounces West during parade speech - The Times

President Putin railed against the West as he oversaw a muted Victory Day parade stripped of three essential ingredients: tanks, aircraft and Russian success in Ukraine.

He used the annual address marking the defeat of Nazi Germany to make a series of accusations against western powers, claiming they had provoked conflict, sown hatred and destroyed family values, as he sought to make the case for his faltering war.

Hours after launching a new barrage of cruise missiles at Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities, Putin accused the West of “unleashing war against Russia” after “forgetting who defeated the Nazis” and “creating a new cult of Nazism” through the destruction of Soviet memorials in eastern Europe.

The parade marks the 78th anniversary of the end of the Second World War

The parade marks the 78th anniversary of the end of the Second World War

ALEXANDER ZEMLIANICHENKO/AP

Russians watch a Victory Day parade in Vladivostok

Russians watch a Victory Day parade in Vladivostok

TATIANA MEEL/REUTERS

He accused “globalist elites” of making the Ukrainian people “hostages to

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXRpbWVzLmNvLnVrL2FydGljbGUvcnVzc2lhLXZpY3RvcnktZGF5LTIwMjMtdmxhZGltaXItcHV0aW4tc3BlZWNoLXBhcmFkZS11a3JhaW5lLThzZDdsbXQ1ZtIBAA?oc=5

2023-05-10 07:28:56Z
1963936856

Donald Trump found to have sexually abused E Jean Carroll - The Telegraph

Donald Trump sexually abused the magazine writer E Jean Carroll and defamed her, a jury decided on Tuesday night, ordering the former US president to pay her $5 million in damages.

However, the civil jury in New York rejected the writer’s claim that Mr Trump raped her.

It was another legal setback for the former US president as he seeks the 2024 Republican presidential nomination.

Responding to the verdict on his Truth Social app, Mr Trump said: “I have absolutely no idea who this woman is.”

He said the jury’s ruling was a “disgrace” and called it “the greatest witch hunt of all time”.

Mr Trump later added: "VERY UNFAIR TRIAL!"

Ms Carroll, 79, bowed her head and nodded when the decision was read while holding hands with her lawyer. 

The former magazine writer is owed $5m in compensation, the jury ruled Credit: JUSTIN LANE/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

She did not speak as she left court but smiled broadly, later saying in a statement: “I filed this lawsuit against Donald Trump to clear my name and to get my life back.

“Today, the world finally knows the truth. This victory is not just for me but for every woman who has suffered because she was not believed."

The nine-member jury in Manhattan federal court rejected Mr Trump’s denial that he assaulted Ms Carroll and ruled in her favour.

To find him liable, the jury of six men and three women was required to reach a unanimous verdict, which they did in less than three hours.

Mr Trump was ordered to pay $2 million (£1.58 million) in damages for sexual abuse, and $3 million for defamation.

A spokesman for Mr Trump, 76, said he would appeal and would not pay the damages while the appeal was ongoing.

Mr Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina said outside the court that his client would appeal the “perplexing and “inconsistent” verdict.

He said: "This was a rape case all along and the jury rejected that."

Mr Trump’s lawyer Joe Tacopina said outside the court that his client would appeal the “perplexing and “inconsistent” verdict Credit: Edna Leshowitz/ZUMA Press Wire/Shutterstock

He said Mr Trump is “firm in his belief, as many people are, that he cannot get a fair trial in New York City, based on the jury pool.

"He's strong, he's ready to move forward, he wants to fight this on appeal.”

Ms Carroll claimed that Mr Trump raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan in either 1995 or 1996.

She argued that he damaged her reputation by writing in a post on Truth Social last October that her claims were a “complete con job,” “a hoax” and “a lie”.

E Jean Carroll watches as Donald Trump's video deposition is played in court during the civil trial Credit: REUTERS

Jurors were given the option of deciding that Mr Trump either raped, sexually abused or forcibly touched Ms Carroll. They decided on “a preponderance of the evidence” that he sexually abused her.

Any one of those findings would have satisfied the claim of battery brought by Ms Carroll.

Before the verdict was read out, Judge Kaplan asked the court to maintain “decorum”, saying there would be no shouting or jumping up and down.

The trial featured evidence from two other women who claimed Mr Trump sexually assaulted them decades ago.

Natasha Stoynoff, a former reporter at People magazine, told jurors that Mr Trump cornered her at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida in 2005 and forcibly kissed her for a “few minutes” until a butler interrupted.

Jessica Leeds testified that Mr Trump kissed her, groped her and put his hand up her skirt on a flight in 1979.

Jurors also heard excerpts from a 2005 “Access Hollywood” video in which Mr Trump made remarks about women.

Mr Trump’s campaign spokesman branded it a “bogus case”, saying it was “a political endeavour targeting President Trump because he is now an overwhelming front-runner to be once again elected President of the United States.”

Donald Trump in Scotland on May 2, 2023 Credit: Getty Images

Mr Trump falsely claimed he was blocked from “speaking and defending” himself during the case, hours before the jury began deliberations.

Before the verdict was handed down, Mr Trump, 76, wrote: “Waiting for a jury decision on a false accusation where I, despite being a current political candidate and leading all others in both parties, am not allowed to speak or defend myself, even as hard nosed reporters scream questions about this case at me.”

Ms Carroll’s lawyer requested the jury be instructed that Mr Trump had declined the opportunity to testify in the case, to which Judge Kaplan replied: “We are where we are”.

Mr Tacopina previously assured Judge Kaplan he would tell his client to refrain from posting about the case after the former president called the lawsuit “a made up SCAM” and claimed Ms Carroll's lawyer was a “political operative”.

It seemed unlikely that the civil verdict would derail Mr Trump's presidential campaign.

Charlie Gerow, a Republican strategist, said: "The folks that are anti-Trump are going to remain that way, the core pro-Trump voters are not going to change.

"And the ambivalent ones I just don’t think are going to be moved by this type of thing."

Asked for his reaction, Joe Biden said: "I'm unaware. I heard that as I've been walking from room to room, I can't comment."

No criminal consequences 

Because it was a civil case, Mr Trump will face no criminal consequences. His legal team decided not to present a defence or put Mr Trump himself on the witness stand. 

Mr Trump had argued that Ms Carroll, a former Elle magazine columnist and a registered Democrat, made up the allegations to hurt him politically and boost sales of her book.

Ms Carroll told the jury she bumped into Mr Trump at Bergdorf's while he was shopping for a gift for another woman.

She told the jury that she agreed to help Mr Trump pick out a gift, and the two looked at lingerie before he coaxed her into a dressing room, slammed her head into a wall and raped her.

Ms Carroll testified she could not remember the precise date or year the alleged rape occurred.

Mr Trump's legal team questioned why she had never reported the matter to police or screamed during the alleged incident.

Two of Ms Carroll's friends said she told them about the incident at the time but swore them to secrecy because she feared that Mr Trump would use his fame and wealth to retaliate against her if she came forward.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiUmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay93b3JsZC1uZXdzLzIwMjMvMDUvMDkvZG9uYWxkLXRydW1wLXRyaWFsLXNleHVhbC1hYnVzZS_SAQA?oc=5

2023-05-10 07:27:00Z
2005115056