Jumat, 09 Februari 2024

Putin rants about Ukraine, US reporter, and history in Tucker Carlson interview: Live - The Independent

Putin calls Ukraine an ‘artificial state shaped at Stalin’s will’

Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson released his interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who started with a long diatribe on Russian history and its relationship with Ukraine.

The two-hour, seven-minute interview was recorded on 6 February and released in full shortly before 6pm ET on Thursday. Carlson travelled to Moscow for Putin’s first interview with a Western media figure since the invasion of Ukraine began in February 2022.

Putin repeated his argument that Ukraine wasn’t a real country which was shaped by the “will” of Soviet leader Josef Stalin.

When Carlson requested that jailed Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich be allowed to return to the US with Carlson and his crew as a show of “goodwill” from Putin, the Russian leader said that his “goodwill” had run out, complaining about the lack of reciprocity from the West.

Asked why he doesn’t call President Joe Biden and work out a solution in Ukraine, Putin asked: “What’s there to work out?”

“Stop supplying weapons and it will be over within weeks,” he added.

Putin also claimed that peace talks had at one point “reached a very high stage of coordination of positions ... they were almost finalized”.

1707466847

In video: Putin repeatedly claims Evan Gershkovich received classified information

Putin repeatedly claims Evan Gershkovich received classified information

Vladimir Putin claimed that jailed American journalist Evan Gershkovich had been caught “red-handed” with classified information that he had obtained from one of his sources in a clandestine manner. In a conversation with right-wing commentator Tucker Carlson, the Russian president denied that the Wall Street Journal reporter was innocent of the espionage charges for which he remains imprisoned. The newspaper and other US news outlets strongly deny any wrongdoing by Mr Gershkovich. They say his activities fell strictly under the umbrella of legitimate journalism. “He was caught red-handed when he was receiving this information,” Putin told Mr Carlson.

Namita Singh9 February 2024 08:20
1707465600

Putin claims ‘Ukraine is an artificial state that was shaped at Stalin’s will’

Interrupting Putin’s history monologue, Carlson asked: “You obviously have encyclopedic knowledge of this region, but why didn’t you make this case for the first 22 years as president that Ukraine wasn’t a real country?”

“The Soviet Union was given a great deal of territory that had never belonged to including the Black Sea region, received Bucha at some point, when Russia received them as an outcome of the Russo-Turkish wars, they were called New Russia ... but that does not matter. What matters is that Lenin the founder of the Soviet state ... established Ukraine that way,” Putin said.

“For decades the Ukrainian Soviet Republic developed as part of the USSR. And for unknown reasons, again, the Bolsheviks were engaged in Ukrainian causation. It was not merely because the Soviet leadership was composed to a great extent of those originating from Ukraine. Rather, it was explained by the general policy of indigenisation pursued by the Soviet Union,” the Russian leader added.

“Same things were done in other Soviet republics. This involves promoting national languages and national cultures, which is not a bad in principle,” he said. “That is how the Soviet Ukraine was created. After World War Two Ukraine received in addition to the lands that had belonged to Poland before the war, both of the lands that had previously belonged to Hungary and Romania – So Romania and Hungary had some of their lands taken away and given to the Soviet Ukraine, and they still remain part of Ukrainian.”

“So in this sense, we have every reason to affirm that Ukraine is an artificial state that was shaped at Stalin’s will,” Putin claimed.

In November 2022, Olesya Khromeychuk, a historian and the director of the Ukrainian Institute London, wrote in The New York Times: This historical experience — of statelessness and struggle, repressive external rule and hard-won independence — has shaped Ukraine into the nation we see today: opposed to imperialism, united in the face of the enemy and determined to protect its freedom. For the people of Ukraine, freedom is not some lofty ideal. It is imperative for survival.”

In May 2022, US historian Stephen Schlesinger wrote in PassBlue: “Seven years before his death, in preparation for the Soviet Union joining the newly formed United Nations, Stalin advanced the proposition that Ukraine was an independent state.”

“His pronouncement came about during the conference that established the UN in San Francisco in the spring of 1945. There, Stalin demanded that Ukraine be admitted to the body as a separate, distinct nation with all the rights and privileges that come with full membership, including its own ambassador and participation as a member state in all UN sessions,” the historian added. “Stalin’s stance initially grew out of the Dumbarton Oaks conclave, which was held in Washington a year earlier, where the four sponsoring nations of the UN — Britain, the Soviet Union, the United States and China — met to draft the UN Charter.”

Gustaf Kilander9 February 2024 08:00
1707464613

Humanity needs to think about advances in genetics and AI: Putin

Vladimir Putin said the world was changing faster than during the collapse of the Roman Empire, mentioning advances in genetic research and artificial intelligence. He said geneticists could create a “superman” and quipped that Elon Musk had put a chip in a human brain.

But he said that humanity needed to think about what to do about the advances in genetics and artificial intelligence and suggested the nuclear arms control treaties of the Cold War could be a guide.

“When there arises an understanding that the boundless and uncontrolled development of artificial intelligence or genetics or some other modern trends, cannot be stopped, that these researches will still exist just as it was impossible to hide gunpowder from humanity... when humanity feels a threat to itself, to humanity as a whole, then, it seems to me, there will come a period to negotiate at the inter-state level on how we will regulate this,” Mr Putin said.

Namita Singh9 February 2024 07:43
1707464447

What did Putin say about war with Ukraine?

After a half-hour lecture on the history of Russia and Ukraine dating back to dawn of Slavic history in 862, Vladimir Putin told Tucker Carlson that Russia and Ukraine almost agreed to a peace deal in Istanbul shortly after the full-scale war began in 2022 but that it was turned down by Ukraine at the behest of the West, specifically Boris Johnson, then British prime minister.

He suggested the West and Ukraine think about peace.

<p>In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia’s president Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with the Presidential Council for Science and Education via video link in Moscow on 8 February 2024</p>

In this pool photograph distributed by Russian state agency Sputnik, Russia’s president Vladimir Putin chairs a meeting with the Presidential Council for Science and Education via video link in Moscow on 8 February 2024

“Wouldn’t it be better to come to an agreement with Russia? To agree, understanding the situation that is today, understanding that Russia will fight for its interests to the end, and, understanding this, actually return to common sense, start respecting our country, its interests and look for some solutions?”

And Russia? “We are ready for this dialogue.”

Mr Putin questioned why the United States needed to spend so much on arming Ukraine for a war he cast in some ways similar to a “civil war”.

“Does the United States need this? Why? It is thousands of kilometres away from its territory! Don’t you have anything else to do?” Mr Putin said. He said there were mercenaries from the United States, Poland and Georgia fighting for Ukraine.

Namita Singh9 February 2024 07:40
1707463234

In video: Putin repeats de-Nazification claim, meanders around Carlson questions

Putin repeats de-Nazification claim, meanders around Carlson questions
Namita Singh9 February 2024 07:20
1707462313

EU denies claim Tucker Carlson faces sanction over Putin interview

Peter Stano, a spokesperson for EU foreign policy boss Josep Borrell, told the media on Thursday that “It’s not up to us to try to pre-empt or speculate whether someone will be proposed by a member state or group of member states to be put on the sanctions list”.

Namita Singh9 February 2024 07:05
1707462000

Russian opposition leader on why Kremlin-controlled media loves Carlson

Gustaf Kilander9 February 2024 07:00
1707459817

Putin says if US stops giving Ukraine weapons the war will be over ‘in weeks’

More here:

Namita Singh9 February 2024 06:23
1707459757

Putin repeats ‘nonsense’ claim Boris Johnson scuppered efforts to end Ukraine invasion

During a highly anticipated sit-down interview with former Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson, the Russian president said, via a translator, that a “huge document” had been prepared and approved by the head of the Ukranian delegation, before Mr Johnson had stepped in and “dissuaded” Ukraine’s president Volodymyr Zelensky.

“He put his signature and then he himself said, ‘we were ready to sign it and the war would have been over long ago’. However, Prime Minister Johnson came talk to us out of it, and we’ve missed that chance.”

Mike Bedigan report:

Namita Singh9 February 2024 06:22
1707458625

Tucker Carlson fawns over ‘beautiful’ Moscow as he jokes about ‘betraying’ US

He continued: “Why do I feel guilty, like I’m betraying my country for saying that, I’m not, I love America. This is a really nice city. And I don’t care. It’s true. So thank you.”

Namita Singh9 February 2024 06:03

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvYW1lcmljYXMvdHVja2VyLWNhcmxzb24tcHV0aW4tZnVsbC1pbnRlcnZpZXctd2hlbi10aW1lLWIyNDkyNjUxLmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2024-02-09 08:20:47Z
CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvYW1lcmljYXMvdHVja2VyLWNhcmxzb24tcHV0aW4tZnVsbC1pbnRlcnZpZXctd2hlbi10aW1lLWIyNDkyNjUxLmh0bWzSAQA

Joe Biden: A political hand grenade disguised as a report - BBC

Joe Biden gestures as he speaks at the White House on February 8Reuters

It was a political grenade disguised as a 345-page report.

The pyrotechnics were delivered on Thursday afternoon in the findings of special counsel Robert Hur's investigation into Joe Biden's handling of classified documents after he left the vice-presidency in 2017.

The top-line conclusion was that the president would not face criminal charges for his actions, despite evidence that he had "wilfully retained and disclosed classified materials... when he was a private citizen".

The bottom line was much more damaging. Among the reasons Mr Hur listed for why he had decided not to prosecute the 81-year-old president was because he would likely be a sympathetic figure to a jury who would view him as a "well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".

Issues about Joe Biden's age and competency to serve another four years in office have been simmering for practically as long as Mr Biden has been in the White House, so this latest finding will provide fuel for Republican attacks and stoking concerns among some Democrats that the president is not up to the task.

It is a narrative that the Biden campaign has been desperately trying to confront, said Chris Borick, the director of the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion.

"The polling, over and over, we see data points that suggest it is his largest liability into this election that voters think he's simply too old to run," he says.

It's no surprise, then, that the Hur report prompted the White House to launch a furious counter-offensive that included the president holding an impromptu press conference, where he asserted that his memory was "just fine".

"I know what the hell I'm doing," he said.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

What's more, the special counsel presented specific evidence to back up this assertion. He wrote that during two days of interviews, Mr Biden had frequently been unable to recall details relevant to the investigation. More than that, Mr Hur recounted, he had struggled to recall which years he had been vice-president and when his oldest son, Beau Biden, had died of cancer.

It was this last claim that prompted an angry response from the president during his press conference at the White House on Thursday evening.

"How in the hell he dare raise that?" the president said.

The press conference itself could lend more fuel to the attacks on Mr Biden, however, as the president answered a question about the Gaza War by referring to Egyptian President Mohamed al-Sisi as the president of Mexico.

That stumble, not unlike other verbal miscues by Mr Biden in recent days, exposes the scope of the challenge facing his re-election effort. The best way for the president to address concerns about his age is to run a vigorous campaign and increase his public exposure. But every attempt comes with the risk of actions or evidence that feed existing concerns.

The White House has made other efforts to defuse the potency of the Hur report. Mr Biden's personal lawyer, Richard Sauber, tried to convince the special counsel to drop references to Mr Biden's mental acuity and mental lapses, writing in a letter that such language was not "accurate or appropriate".

Mr Biden also noted that he had given his two days of testimony to the special counsel shortly after the 7 October Hamas attack on Israel - while he was "in the middle of handling an international crisis", he said.

Other Biden allies have pushed back on Mr Hur's impartiality, pointing out that he was appointed to a US attorney office by Donald Trump in 2017. It was Biden Attorney General Merrick Garland who selected Mr Hur as special counsel, however.

The Biden team has also been quick to pounce on the verbal missteps of his likely November opponent, 77-year-old Donald Trump. The former president recently confused his primary opponent Nikki Haley with former Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and referred to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban as the leader of Turkey.

The best case for the White House may be that this particular grenade exploded in February, a full nine months from election day.

Larry Sabato, the director for the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, says concerns about Mr Biden's age are already essentially baked into the race, making the report damaging but not fatal.

The public "will look at it, and will raise one eyebrow, not both", he says. "Because in a way, people already knew this. Even if you casually watch five minutes of a speech he's giving, you already know this," he says.

When American voters finally head to the polls, the assertions contained in a special counsel report that ultimately declined to find Mr Biden criminally culpable will be of less concern than issues like the economy and abortion.

The worst-case scenario, on the other hand, is that this is just the start of a cavalcade of evidence undermining the president on one of his weakest attributes. And the arrow of time only points one way.

The president isn't getting any younger.

line
US Election Unspun logo

If you're in the UK, sign up here.

And if you're anywhere else, sign up here.

line

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODA1OdIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODA1OS5hbXA?oc=5

2024-02-09 06:20:13Z
CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODA1OdIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODA1OS5hbXA

US election: Donald Trump wins crushing victory in Nevada caucus - BBC

Donald Trump speaks into a microphone in Nevada on 8 FebruaryReuters

Former President Donald Trump has won the Nevada Republican caucus by a large margin.

The only other person whose name was on the ballot was Ryan Binkley, a pastor and businessman.

It means Mr Trump will take all Nevada's 26 delegates, the system used by the parties to determine their presidential candidate.

Initial results reported by CNN showed the former president gaining more than 98% of the vote.

Briefly addressing a victory party in Las Vegas, Donald Trump said: "If we win this state, we easily win the election in November."

Donald Trump has now won contests in three states - Nevada, Iowa and New Hampshire - making him the presumptive Republican candidate in November's general election.

He also won a Republican caucus in the US Virgin Islands, an unincorporated territory.

Donald Trump's only serious challenger left in the race, former South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley, had opted not to take part in the Nevada caucus and to appear in the state's primary vote instead.

Two separate ballots were held in Nevada because of a dispute between the state Republican Party and the Democratic-controlled state legislature.

In Tuesday's primary, Nikki Haley was beaten by the "none of these candidates" option.

But the result was symbolic as the state's Republican party had decided that only the results of the caucus would count towards the selection of the presidential candidate.

Nikki Haley's team said they did not take part in the caucus, claiming it had been "rigged for Trump".

The situation in Nevada caused confusion and frustration.

It had been criticised by the state's Republican governor, who said there should have been a single ballot for voters.

Although the result of the Nevada caucus was a foregone conclusion, the state will be hotly contested in the November presidential election. The vote is effectively guaranteed to be a rematch between 2020 candidates Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

Mr Trump's next stop will be South Carolina, where he will again go head to head against Nikki Haley.

Despite three defeats, she has vowed to fight on, arguing that Republican supporters want to see an alternative to Donald Trump and that "voters want an election, not a coronation".

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODczMdIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODczMS5hbXA?oc=5

2024-02-09 06:45:50Z
CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODczMdIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0ODczMS5hbXA

Kamis, 08 Februari 2024

Pakistan election - live: Counting of votes underway in polls hit by violence and internet shutdown - The Independent

Pakistan temporarily suspends mobile services nationwide for general elections

At least nine people were killed in Pakistan in poll-related violence and attacks as the country’s 240 million population votes to elect their new parliament and prime minister in high-stake elections.

The attack took place in northwest Pakistan’s Dera Ismail Khan as gunmen set off a bomb and then opened fire at a police van, police officials said. At least two others were injured in the attack.

Khalid Khan, local police official, said casualties include officers assigned to security duty in the district for the parliamentary elections. No one claimed responsibility for the attack so far.

Mobile network and data services have also been blocked in several parts of Pakistan as voters complained of no internet reception outdoors.

The elections, already hit by accusations of rigging and unfair conditions for main opponent Imran Khan, are seeing at least 44 political parties vying for a share of the 266 seats that are up for grabs in the National Assembly, or the lower house of parliament.

An additional 70 seats are reserved for women and minorities in the 336-seat house.

Voting started at 8am local time as polling stations opened for both national and provincial assemblies and is set to conclude by 5pm.

1707444000

ICYMI: What is Imran Khan’s appeals process following two new major convictions?

Pakistan‘s former prime minister Imran Khan will take his long-drawn legal fight to the higher courts, his party says, after he was found guilty in two different cases just a week before the country’s general election.

Mr Khan and his wife, Bushra Bibi, were each awarded jail terms of 14 years on Wednesday for illegally selling gifts worth more than £395,000 from the state treasury, known as the “Toshakhana”, during his premiership. He was also barred from holding public office for 10 years and they were fined approximately £2.2m each.

Full report:

Matt Mathers9 February 2024 02:00
1707442200

ICYMI: Internet and mobile phone services shut in Pakistan in ‘ominous start’ to election day

Matt Mathers9 February 2024 01:30
1707440400

ICYMI: Nawaz Sharif neighbourhood echoes cheers for Imran Khan

In the Nawaz Sharif stronghold of Lahore, there was nonetheless a robust turnout for Imran Khan’s party.In the Ghauri Shahu neighborhood, Kashfa Zain said she left the house at 6:30 a.m. to make sure she was on time to cast her vote for one of Khan’s candidates.

“My kids were impressing on me how important it was to get here early. The kids are making such an effort with this election. They know all about it. They are all voting for PTI,” as Khan’s party is known, she said.Her daughter Ilham, 19, studied the party’s policies and figures on Instagram, including which candidates were using which symbols. “They went through it several times,” Kashfa Zain said.

Sharif’s supporters appeared to express less enthusiasm and determination, even in his own constituency. One voter said he had to vote for the family because they were his neighbors and he saw them almost every day.

“They are good for the economy. They are good for industry,” said photographer Shahrukh Bhatti. “They have good controls on foreign exchange. But people are so demoralized about this vote,” he said, throwing his hands up as a sign of helplessness.“It’s being controlled by outside forces,” he said, a reference to the country’s military, which has ruled Pakistan for more than half of its history and still ultimately decides who comes to power.

Matt Mathers9 February 2024 01:00
1707438600

ICYMI: Nine killed as violence mars Pakistan election

At least nine people, including two children, were killed in militant attacks in Pakistan today as the country voted in a general election after suspending mobile phone services and closing some land borders to maintain law and order.

The interior ministry said it took the security steps after at least 26 people were killed in two explosions near electoral candidates’ offices in the southwestern province of Balochistan on Wednesday. Islamic State later claimed responsibility for those attacks.

“As a result of the recent incidents of terrorism in the country precious lives have been lost, security measures are essential to maintain the law and order situation and deal with possible threats,” the ministry said in a post on messaging platform X.

Thousands of troops were deployed on the streets and at polling stations across the country as voting commenced and borders with Iran and Afghanistan were temporarily closed.

Despite the heightened security, five policemen were killed in a bomb blast and firing on a patrol in the Kulachi area of Dera Ismail Khan district in the northwest, authorities said. Another person died in firing on a security forces vehicle in Tank, about 40 km (25 miles) to the north.

Matt Mathers9 February 2024 00:30
1707436860

ICYMI: UN rights body expresses alarm at ‘pattern of harassment’ of Imran Khan’s party ahead of Pakistan polls

“We are disturbed…by the pattern of harassment, arrests and prolonged detentions of leaders of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party and their supporters, which has continued during the election period,” said Elizabeth Throssell, spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for human rights.

Full report:

Matt Mathers9 February 2024 00:01
1707435052

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari: The millennial ex-minister bidding to become Pakistan’s youngest ever PM

Full report:

Matt Mathers8 February 2024 23:30
1707433252

Pakistan’s choice at election today: The lion, the millennial or the cricketer

Despite a crackdown against one of its most popular parties and doubts over the role of the powerful military establishment, there is an air of anticipation regarding Pakistan’s election. Arpan Rai reports:

Matt Mathers8 February 2024 23:00
1707431452

Imran Khan’s demise has been swift and brutal – but it would be a mistake to write him off

Just a few years ago the former cricketer had successfully conquered Pakistan’s tumultuous political landscape – now he’s facing 14 years behind bars. Yet all is not lost for the man who once made even the country’s feared military fall into line, writes Omar Waraich

Read Omar’s piece in full here:

Matt Mathers8 February 2024 22:30
1707429652

ICYMI: What you need to know about candidates, key issues and what this election means for the country

Pakistan‘s 127 million voters get to elect a new parliament today. The elections are the twelfth in the country’s 76-year history, which has been marred by economic crises, military takeovers and martial law, militancy, political upheavals and wars with India.

Forty-four political parties are vying for a share of the 266 seats that are up for grabs in the National Assembly, or the lower house of parliament, with an additional 70 seats reserved for women and minorities.

Full report:

Matt Mathers8 February 2024 22:00
1707427852

Military likely to have big say in election outcome - analyst

The military has dominated the nuclear-armed country either directly or indirectly in its 76 years of independence but for several years it has maintained it does not interfere in politics.

"The deciding factor is which side the powerful military and its security agencies are on," said Abbas Nasir, a columnist. "Only a huge turnout in favour of (Khan’s) PTI can change its fortunes."

He added: "Economic challenges are so serious, grave, and the solutions so very painful that I am unsure how anyone who comes to power will steady the ship."

Matt Mathers8 February 2024 21:30

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMidGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL2FzaWEvc291dGgtYXNpYS9wYWtpc3Rhbi1lbGVjdGlvbi1yZXN1bHRzLW5hd2F6LXNoYXJpZi1pbXJhbi1raGFuLWxhdGVzdC1iMjQ5Mjg2OC5odG1s0gEA?oc=5

2024-02-09 00:30:00Z
CBMidGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL2FzaWEvc291dGgtYXNpYS9wYWtpc3Rhbi1lbGVjdGlvbi1yZXN1bHRzLW5hd2F6LXNoYXJpZi1pbXJhbi1raGFuLWxhdGVzdC1iMjQ5Mjg2OC5odG1s0gEA

Biden defends his memory after special counsel criticism - BBC

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

US President Biden has angrily criticised an investigation into his handling of classified files which questioned his memory.

He held a surprise news briefing on Thursday evening, telling reporters: "My memory is fine."

Mr Biden confronted a claim that he struggled to remember when his son died, saying,"How the hell dare he raise that?"

Special Counsel Robert Hur decided not to charge Mr Biden for mishandling files.

But his report made several scathing remarks, including suggesting the president's memory had "significant limitations".

It said that it would be difficult to convict the president of improper handling of files because "at trial, Mr Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".

Mr Biden responded that despite his age, he was the most qualified person to be president.

Referring to interviews he gave the special counsel late last year, he said: "I was very occupied. I was in the middle of handling an international crisis," - referring to the 7 October attacks by Hamas in Israel which occurred a day before.

Mr Biden's age has become a top concern for voters going into November's presidential election.

Asked to comment on the latest developments in the Gaza war during Thursday's evening news conference, he confused the presidents of Mexico and Egypt.

"I think as you know initially, the president of Mexico, Sisi, did not want to open up the gate to allow humanitarian material to get in. I talked to him. I convinced him," he said.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NDM1MtIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NDM1Mi5hbXA?oc=5

2024-02-09 01:10:49Z
CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NDM1MtIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NDM1Mi5hbXA

Supreme Court appears set to strike down Colorado ruling to kick Trump off 2024 ballot - The Independent

US Supreme Court justices appeared to doubt state authority to disqualify Donald Trump from holding public office, after the former president challenged a landmark court ruling from Colorado’s highest court which found him ineligible for the presidency due to his actions surrounding January 6.

An historic two-hour hearing at the nation’s highest court on Thursday heard oral arguments in a case that could determine whether the leading candidate for the Republican Party’s nomination for president can remain on ballots in primary elections.

Last year, justices on Colorado’s Supreme Court disqualified Mr Trump under the scope of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which holds that “no person” can hold any office, “civil or military, under the United States”, if they “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same”.

But both conservative and liberal justices on the nine-member US Supreme Court on Thursday appeared to cast doubt on the ability of individual states to disqualify federal candidates without permission from Congress.

The justices will issue their decision in Trump v Anderson at a later date.

Chief justice John Roberts said granting states control over candidates for federal election would be “at war” with the Constitution and warned that a decision to disqualify Mr Trump could open up attempts to disqualify candidates “on the other side”.

“In very quick order I would expect … that a goodly number of states will say whoever the Democratic candidate is, you’re off the ballot,” he said. “And it will come down to a handful of states that will determine the presidential election.”

“Why should that be the right rule?” asked justice Elena Kagan. “Why should a single state make that determination, not just for their own state, but for the whole nation?”

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, however, called Mr Trump’s legal argument “a bit of a gerrymandered rule designed only to benefit your client”.

Norma Anderson, the lead plaintiff in a case to disqualify Donald Trump from 2024 ballots, speaks outside the US Supreme Court on 8 February

Justices spent relatively little time trying to define “insurrection” let alone whether Mr Trump had “engaged” with it after a mob of his supporters stormed the US Capitol to block the certification of 2020 presidential election results, fuelled by his ongoing baseless narrative that the election was “rigged” against him, while calling on his supporters to “fight like hell” on his behalf.

Mr Trump’s attorney Jonathan Mitchell argued that “even an admitted insurrectionist” could still be allowed on the ballot and be elected to office and that it’s only up to Congress to decide whether that candidate should be removed.

Attorneys for the former president have argued that the Capitol attack was only a “riot” and that Mr Trump didn’t engage with anything resembling insurrection. Mr Mitchell argued to the justices that an insurrection “needs to be an organized, concerted effort” to overthrow the government.

“A chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection?” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson fired back.

“We didn’t concede that it’s an effort to overthrow the government either,” Mr Mitchell said. “This was a riot. It was not an insurrection. The events were shameful, criminal, violent – all of those things. But it did not qualify as insurrection.”

But Ms Jackson also questioned why the office of the presidency is not explicitly named in the 14th Amendment, and doubted whether its authors “would have designed a system that would – could – result in interim disuniformity” in US elections.

Justice Neil Gorsuch argued that the Constitution speaks to candidates who “hold” office, as opposed to those who are “running” for office.

But plaintiffs’ attorney Jason Murray said that the “insurrection” disqualifier has “existed since January 6, 2021, when President Trump engaged in insurrection”.

The case stems from a lawsuit from government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington on behalf of a group of Republican and independent voters in Colorado, who argued that Mr Trump “failed” Section 3’s test, rendering him “constitutionally ineligible to appear on any Colorado ballot as a candidate for federal or state office”.

Following a trial and arguments from both parties in state court last year, Colorado district judge Sarah Wallace determined that Mr Trump not only “engaged” with insurrection, he also “acted with the specific intent to incite political violence and direct it at the Capitol with the purpose of disrupting the electoral certification”.

Her decision, however, did not knock him off the ballot, as plaintiffs appealed the ruling up to the state’s Supreme Court, where the justices later ruled that Mr Trump’s actions “constituted overt, voluntary, and direct participation in the insurrection”.

The former president appealed that decision to the Supreme Court, which scheduled Thursday’s hearing relatively swiftly, amid a fast-approaching packed primary election calendar up against Mr Trump’s busy schedule of multiple criminal and civil cases.

Mr Trump’s legal team could return to the Supreme Court later this year if his attorneys appeal a federal court ruling that strikes down his “immunity” defence from prosecution on charges connected to his attempts to overturn election results.

“It’s striking, just steps away from the US Capitol, where Donald Trump incited an insurrection ... where congresspeople ran for their lives, we saw Trump once again lie about his role in the insurrection,” Colorado secretary of state Jena Griswold said from the steps of the high court after Thursday’s hearing.

“I think it’s just so outrageous that Trump continues to think he’s above the law, above the Constitution and above the court system,” she said. “I hope the justices hold him accountable.”

Donald Trump speaks to reporters outside his Mar-a-Lago estate after Supreme Court justices heard oral arguments in a challenge to remove him from Colorado ballots

Norma Anderson – a former Republican state legislator from Colorado who is the lead plaintiff in the challenge – told reporters after the hearing that the case is “very personal” to her.

“I’ve lived a hell of a long time and I’ve gone through a lot of presidents,” the 91-year-old former lawmaker said outside the court. “And this is the first one that is trying to destroy the Constitution.”

In remarks outside his Mar-a-Lago property in Florida after the hearing, the former president called the arguments a “very beautiful process” and blasted what he continues to baselessly assert is a Democratic conspiracy against him.

“Can you take the person that’s leading everywhere and say ‘Hey, we’re not going to let you run?’ You know, I think that’s pretty tough to do, but I’m leaving it up to the Supreme Court,” he said.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvYW1lcmljYXMvdXMtcG9saXRpY3MvdHJ1bXAtYmFsbG90LXN1cHJlbWUtY291cnQtYjI0OTMwNTYuaHRtbNIBAA?oc=5

2024-02-08 21:54:13Z
CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvYW1lcmljYXMvdXMtcG9saXRpY3MvdHJ1bXAtYmFsbG90LXN1cHJlbWUtY291cnQtYjI0OTMwNTYuaHRtbNIBAA

Special counsel says Biden will not be charged over classified documents - BBC

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

US President Joe Biden "wilfully retained and disclosed classified materials", a special counsel has found, but he will not be charged.

The report says Mr Biden shared some of the sensitive material with a ghostwriter for his memoir.

But the special counsel concludes it would be difficult to convict the president as he comes across as an "elderly man with a poor memory".

The files were found at Mr Biden's home and former private office from 2022-23.

The special counsel's report revealed for the first time that the documents were classified as Top Secret - the highest level of secrecy, and were about military and foreign policy in Afghanistan.

The files included notebooks containing Mr Biden's entries about national security and foreign policy matters "implicating sensitive intelligence sources and methods".

But the report by justice department Special Counsel Robert Hur says: "We conclude that the evidence does not establish Mr Biden's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

"Prosecution of Mr Biden is also unwarranted based on our consideration of the aggravating and mitigating factors."

Biden's memory had 'significant limitations'

The 345-page report was released publicly on Thursday after the White House said it would not request any redactions.

Investigators conducted 173 interviews with 147 witnesses, including President Biden himself.

In a statement from the White House, Mr Biden, 81, said: "I was pleased to see they reached the conclusion I believed all along they would reach - that there would be no charges brought in this case and the matter is now closed."

He said that he had sat for a total of five hours of interviews on 8-9 October "even though Israel had just been attacked on October 7th and I was in the middle of handling an international crisis".

The special counsel's report says that it would be difficult to convict the president of improper handling of files because "at trial, Mr Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory".

"It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him - by then a former president well into his 80s of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness."

Mr Hur's report said Mr Biden's memory seemed to have "significant limitations". He could not recall when he was vice-president (from 2009-2017), or "even within several years, when his son Beau died" (2015).

"And his memory appeared hazy when describing the Afghanistan debate that was once so important to him."

White House slams 'highly prejudicial language'

The report comes with an attached letter from Mr Biden's legal team, asking that the special counsel "revisit your descriptions of President Biden's memory and revise them so that they are stated in a manner that is within the bounds of your expertise and remit".

"We do not believe that the report's treatment of President Biden's memory is accurate or appropriate," wrote White House lawyer Richard Sauber.

"The report uses highly prejudicial language to describe a commonplace occurrence among witnesses: a lack of recall of years-old events."

For the oldest president in American history, being characterised as an "elderly man with a poor memory" will be seen as politically unhelpful as he seeks another four years in office.

His Republican critics picked up on this line in the report.

A joint statement released by Republican House leadership called the comments about Mr Biden's memory lapses "the most disturbing parts of this report".

"A man too incapable of being held accountable for mishandling classified information is certainly unfit for the Oval Office," the Republicans wrote.

The presidential campaign of Donald Trump, who faces trial this year on charges over alleged mishandling of secret files, released a statement saying: "If you're too senile to stand trial, then you're too senile to be president. Joe Biden is unfit to lead this nation."

the cluttered garage where the docs were found
DOJ

The report says that Mr Biden's actions "present[ed] serious risks to national security, given the vulnerability of extraordinarily sensitive information to loss or compromise to America's adversaries".

"But addressing those risks when pursuing criminal charges, the only means available to this office, is not the proper remedy here."

Ghostwriter deleted Biden recordings

The report also says that Mr Biden divulged classified material from his hand-written notebooks to the ghostwriter for his 2018 memoir Promise Me, Dad.

"He consulted the notebooks liberally during hours of discussions with his ghostwriter and viewed them as highly private and valued possessions with which he was unwilling to part," the special counsel found.

The ghostwriter, Mark Zwonitzer, deleted audio recordings of discussions with Mr Biden after learning of the special counsel's probe, the report says.

Prosecutors considered filing charges against the ghostwriter, but ultimately declined to do so after determining that "his decision to delete the recordings was not aimed at concealing those materials from investigators," and was rather his standard practice with his clients.

Biden kept Afghan files to show Obama's 'mistaken decision'

The Hur report says Mr Biden had "a strong motive" to retain some of the classified files because he wanted to prove that President Barack Obama, whom he served under as vice-president, was wrong about Afghanistan.

He hoped to demonstrate that Mr Obama's 2009 troop deployment to fight the Taliban "was a mistake on par with Vietnam".

"He wanted record to show that he was right about Afghanistan; that his critics were wrong; and that he had opposed President Obama's mistaken decision forcefully when it was made - that his judgment was sound when it mattered most."

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Mr Hur was appointed by US Attorney General Merrick Garland in early 2023 to lead the investigation.

The inquiry began after a separate inquiry had been launched into secret documents found at Mr Trump's Florida home.

In June, Mr Trump was charged with seven counts of mishandling classified documents and obstructing an investigation into the storage of the material at Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach.

He has denied any wrongdoing and repeatedly argued it was his right to retain the records. His trial is set to begin in Miami in May.

In Mr Biden's case, documents were first discovered by his aides in an office he used after departing the vice-presidency in 2017 and before he launched his 2020 bid for the White House.

Mr Biden's notebooks were also recovered from his Delaware home office
DOJ

The first batch of classified documents was found on 2 November 2022 at the Penn Biden Center, a think tank he founded in Washington DC.

A second cache was found in December 2022 in the garage of his Wilmington, Delaware, home, while another document was found in a storage space at the house in January 2023, his lawyers said at the time.

After finding the files, the president said his team turned them over to the National Archives and the Department of Justice.

Under the Presidential Records Act, White House records once an administration ends are supposed to go to the National Archives, where they can be stored securely.

Other high-ranking US officials, such as former Vice-President Mike Pence and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, have also been accused of mishandling sensitive material.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NTYxN9IBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NTYxNy5hbXA?oc=5

2024-02-08 21:49:32Z
CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NTYxN9IBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3dvcmxkLXVzLWNhbmFkYS02ODI0NTYxNy5hbXA