Selasa, 25 Juni 2024

Julian Assange live news: WikiLeaks founder pleads guilty and awaits sentencing in Saipan district courtroom - The Guardian

Assange rises.

Judge Manglona speaks to the charge against him: How do you now plead?

Assange: guilty to the information.

Manglona: guilty to the sole charge?

Assange: Yes.

Manglona: It is the finding of this court ... that the plea of guilty is now accepted.

The defendant is found guilty.

Filters BETA

Here are five things to know about the Northern Mariana Islands, via AFP

1. Closer to Australia

Surrounded by the vast Pacific Ocean, the Northern Mariana Islands is a tiny, remote outpost of the world’s largest economy. Its closest large neighbours are Japan, the Philippines and, most notably in this case, Australia - Julian Assange’s home country, where he will return after the plea deal is completed.

2. US territory

People from the Northern Mariana Islands are US citizens but hold different rights to people from the 50 states – for example, they cannot vote in presidential elections.

3. Wartime history

The archipelago was colonised by Spain in 1668, with war and disease wiping out most of the indigenous population. The US won Guam in 1898 after the Spanish-American War but sold the neighbouring Northern Mariana Islands to Germany.

The islands were administered in the early 20th century by Japan, which brought in thousands of labourers and invaded Guam from there in World War II. The United States captured the territory in 1944 in the Battle of Saipan.

The flag of USA and the flag of the Commonwealth of the Northen Mariana Islands are flown at Saipan International Airport.

4. Tropical destination

The islands are dependent on energy imports but have a growing tourist industry, especially from China and South Korea. It is also close to and shares a name with the Mariana Trench, the deepest known point in the world’s oceans, which has long fascinated scientists and explorers.

5. Natural disasters

There are 14 islands in the Northern Mariana Islands chain, which runs roughly north-south for around 600 kilometres (370 miles). They are dotted with active volcanoes and typhoon season runs from July to January.

It’s 10.47am in Saipan, and the court is taking a 20-minute break.

Assange rises.

Judge Manglona speaks to the charge against him: How do you now plead?

Assange: guilty to the information.

Manglona: guilty to the sole charge?

Assange: Yes.

Manglona: It is the finding of this court ... that the plea of guilty is now accepted.

The defendant is found guilty.

Small error almost uncaught

Judge Manglona asks Julian Assange to rise, but then his lawyer asks quickly to confer with government counsel. Assange leans towards them in an apparent attempt to hear before Robinson grabs him on the arm to speak. Kevin Rudd also leans in for a brief exchange. We can’t hear what they’re saying.

His lawyer says there was a clarification about an agreed edit which didn’t make it into the final draft. It’s about potential breaches of the agreement which could violate it or cause the court to reject it. He wants to make sure that everything there is listed as “intentionally” to avoid any ambiguities.

It’s a small error but one that very nearly wasn’t caught. Both sides agree to do a quick fix now.

Judge Manglona says we’re nearly done with this “change of plea” section, then there will be a 15 minute recess before the “final stage”.

Judge Manglona is again asking Assange to confirm he wishes to plead guilty, be subject to the punishment, and waive rights to an indictment, trial, appeal, statute of limitations and others.

He agrees.

Assange’s actions knowing and deliberate, US attorney says

The actions of the defendant were in all respects knowing and deliberate, US attorney McKenzie says of Julian Assange. He says the details he has laid out are not “all the facts” but ones that are relevant for sentencing purposes.

He doesn’t dispute Assange’s statement of what he believes the first amendment ought to be. He says they don’t align with the statement of facts.

We reject those sentiments but accept that he believes them.

McKenzie says once the plea agreement is accepted and sentence is pronounced, US attorneys will lodge proceedings in the eastern district of Virginia “at the very moment” to dismiss other charges.

Despite the time difference, this should allow the agreement to come into immediate effect.

Assange arriving at the Saipan court earlier.

The news of Julian Assange’s plea deal has drawn a mixed reaction from the US political spectrum, with some hailing the WikiLeaks founder as a champion of press freedom and others saying that he is a threat to national security.

James Clapper, director of US national intelligence in 2010 when Assange and his WikiLeaks organization published secret US intelligence documents with a consortium of newspapers including the Guardian, told CNN:

I actually think this came out pretty well … Critical to this was his plea of one count of espionage.

He’s paid his dues … There was a damage assessment done at the time – there was concern but I don’t recall direct proof that assets in Afghanistan and Iraq supporting or helping the US were exposed.

But Mike Pence, the former Republican vice-president, described Assange’s plea deal as “a miscarriage of justice and dishonors the service and sacrifice of the men and women of our armed forces and their families”.

“Julian Assange endangered the lives of our troops in a time of war and should have been prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” Pence said, adding:

There should be no plea deals to avoid prison for anyone that endangers the security of our military or the national security of the United States. Ever.

McKenzie, one of the US attorneys, is now reading through details of the classified information Chelsea Manning downloaded, and then provided to Wikileaks “understanding that at least some of them would be publicly posted”.

Further details of the crime

US attorneys are reading further details on the crime “to wilfully and unlawfully” obtain, deliver and transmit confidential information belonging to the United States Defence.

The defendant [using Wikileaks] publicly solicited information from people who had then current or prior classified information.

McKenzie is noting Wikileaks also published a “most wanted” list of leaks, including CIA databases, plus Iraq and Afghanistan rules of engagements, Guantanamo Bay interrogation techniques, CIA interrogations videos, and information about certain weapons systems.

Here is a photo of the US district courthouse in Saipan, where the hearing is currently unfolding.

The US courthouse where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has entered a guilty plea to a US espionage charge.

Clarification of guilt

She’s asking his lawyers for a bit of clarification from that statement, which seemed to stray from what she might have expected as an admission of guilty.

Assange’s lawyer says his client feels the two laws should be separate, but he “understands that no court has held there is a first amendment defence to the espionage act ... and is pleading guilty on that basis.”

Assange confirms.

Judge Manglona is asking Assange to explain “what it is you did” for which he is pleading guilty.

Working as a journalist I encouraged my source to provide information that was said to be classified in order to publish that information. I believed the first amendment protected that activity but I accept that it was... a violation of the espionage statute.

She presses for more.

I believe the first amendment and the espionage act are in contradiction with each other but I accept that it would difficult to win such a case given all the circumstances.

Judge considers sentencing

The court is now hashing out sentencing details, and if Judge Manglona is to accept the guilty plea and other aspects of the agreement.

The US attorneys are telling the court details of the 35-year sentence initially issued to Assange’s “co-conspirator”, Chelsea Manning. That sentence was later commuted by then president, Barack Obama, and she served approximately seven years. The judge says this is something she can consider.

The US government is not pursuing any forfeiture from Assange.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMimAFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vbWVkaWEvbGl2ZS8yMDI0L2p1bi8yNi9qdWxpYW4tYXNzYW5nZS1saXZlLW5ld3Mtd2lraWxlYWtzLWZvdW5kZXItbGFuZHMtb24tdXMtaXNsYW5kLW9mLXNhaXBhbi1mb3ItZGlzdHJpY3QtY291cnQtc2VudGVuY2luZ9IBAA?oc=5

2024-06-26 00:50:13Z
CBMimAFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vbWVkaWEvbGl2ZS8yMDI0L2p1bi8yNi9qdWxpYW4tYXNzYW5nZS1saXZlLW5ld3Mtd2lraWxlYWtzLWZvdW5kZXItbGFuZHMtb24tdXMtaXNsYW5kLW9mLXNhaXBhbi1mb3ItZGlzdHJpY3QtY291cnQtc2VudGVuY2luZ9IBAA

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar